Wanda Anderson Loftin1, Steven K Barnett2, Peggy Summers Bunn3, Patra Sullivan4. 1. The College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Dr Loftin) 2. Fairfield Medical Associates, Winnsboro, South Carolina (Dr Barnett) 3. The Diabetes Education Program, Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina (Ms Bunn) 4. Fairfield Diabetes Education Center, Fairfield Memorial Hospital, Winnsboro, South Carolina (Ms Sullivan)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to describe lessons learned about recruitment and retention of rural African Americans from published literature, the authors' research, and research experience. Two rural, community-based research studies with African Americans with diabetes are used to illustrate different issues and strategies in recruitment and retention. METHODS: Relevant MEDLINE articles and clinical studies were reviewed, and the design, implementation, and results of the 2 community-based studies were evaluated. Information from the literature, research results, and sample selection, participation, and attrition experiences were synthesized to determine effective approaches for recruitment and retention. RESULTS: Research funding, design, and implementation; recruitment methods; culturally competent approaches; caring, trusting provider-patient relationships; incentives; follow-up; and factors in the rural environment emerged as important issues influencing recruitment and retention. CONCLUSION: Recruitment and retention of African Americans in rural diabetes research is a significant challenge, and adequate funding should be sought early in the research process. Culturally competent approaches; caring, trusting relationships; incentives; and follow-up are important concepts in successful recruitment, participation, and retention of African Americans. The lessons learned may be applicable to the more widespread issue of recruitment and retention of rural African Americans in diabetes education programs.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to describe lessons learned about recruitment and retention of rural African Americans from published literature, the authors' research, and research experience. Two rural, community-based research studies with African Americans with diabetes are used to illustrate different issues and strategies in recruitment and retention. METHODS: Relevant MEDLINE articles and clinical studies were reviewed, and the design, implementation, and results of the 2 community-based studies were evaluated. Information from the literature, research results, and sample selection, participation, and attrition experiences were synthesized to determine effective approaches for recruitment and retention. RESULTS: Research funding, design, and implementation; recruitment methods; culturally competent approaches; caring, trusting provider-patient relationships; incentives; follow-up; and factors in the rural environment emerged as important issues influencing recruitment and retention. CONCLUSION: Recruitment and retention of African Americans in rural diabetes research is a significant challenge, and adequate funding should be sought early in the research process. Culturally competent approaches; caring, trusting relationships; incentives; and follow-up are important concepts in successful recruitment, participation, and retention of African Americans. The lessons learned may be applicable to the more widespread issue of recruitment and retention of rural African Americans in diabetes education programs.
Authors: Frinny R Polanco; Dinora C Dominguez; Christine Grady; Pamela Stoll; Catalina Ramos; Joann M Mican; Robert Miranda-Acevedo; Marcela Morgan; Jeasmine Aizvera; Lori Purdie; Deloris Koziol; Migdalia V Rivera-Goba Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Monica L Baskin; Lisa C Gary; Claudia M Hardy; Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Isabel Scarinci; Mona N Fouad; Edward E Partridge Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2011 Jan-Feb
Authors: Suzanne E Mazzeo; Nichole R Kelly; Marilyn Stern; Rachel W Gow; Kasey Serdar; Ronald K Evans; Resa M Jones; Cynthia M Bulik Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Sally Hunsberger; Marianne H Alciati; Steven N Blair; Pamela J Goodwin; Anne McTiernan; Rena Wing; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506