Literature DB >> 31668744

Preoperative Blood Pressure Complexity Indices as a Marker for Frailty in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Valluvan Rangasamy1, Teresa S Henriques2, Xinling Xu1, Balachundhar Subramaniam3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Frailty, a state of decreased physiological reserve, increases the risk of adverse outcomes. There is no standard tool for frailty during perioperative period. Autonomic dysfunction, an underlying process in frailty, could result in hemodynamic fluctuations. Complexity, the physiological adaptability of a system can quantify these fluctuations. The authors hypothesized that complexity could be a marker for frailty and explored their relationship in cardiac surgical patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Single-center teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and sixty-four adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTION: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperative beat-to-beat systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) time series were obtained. Complexity indices were calculated using multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis. Frailty was assessed from: age >70 years, body mass index <18.5, hematocrit <35%, albumin <3.4 g/dL, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL. The association between complexity indices and frailty was explored by logistic regression and predictive ability by C-statistics. In total, 190 (52%) patients had frailty. The complexity index (MSEΣ) median (quartile 1, quartile 3) of SAP and MAP time series decreased significantly in frail patients (SAP: 8.32 [7.27, 9.24] v 9.13 [8.00, 9.72], p < 0.001 and MAP: 8.56 [7.56; 9.27] v 9.18 [8.26; 9.83], p < 0.001). MSE Σ demonstrated a fair predictive ability of frailty (C-statistic: SAP 0.62 and MAP 0.64).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative BP complexity indices correlate and predict frailty. Impaired autonomic control is the underlying mechanism to explain this finding. A simple automated measure of preoperative BP complexity in the surgeon's office has the potential to reliably assess frailty.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BP variability; cardiac surgeries; complexity; frailty; preoperative assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31668744      PMCID: PMC6986993          DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  32 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty.

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Arnold Mitnitski
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.076

3.  Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score.

Authors:  Levana G Amrock; Mark D Neuman; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie Deiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Comparison of Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements for Assessing Signal Complexity and Surgical Risk in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Lauren E Gibson; Teresa S Henriques; Madalena D Costa; Roger B Davis; Murray A Mittleman; Pooja Mathur; Balachundhar Subramaniam
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Frailty assessment: from clinical to radiological tools.

Authors:  Itay Bentov; Stephen J Kaplan; Tam N Pham; May J Reed
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Blood pressure variability: can nonlinear dynamics enhance risk assessment during cardiovascular surgery?

Authors:  Balachundhar Subramaniam; Kamal R Khabbaz; Thomas Heldt; Adam B Lerner; Murray A Mittleman; Roger B Davis; Ary L Goldberger; Madalena D Costa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability is associated with improved 30 day survival.

Authors:  M A Levin; G W Fischer; H-M Lin; P J McCormick; M Krol; D L Reich
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Dorry L Segev; Peter J Pronovost; Dora Syin; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Purvi Patel; Ryan Takenaga; Lara Devgan; Christine G Holzmueller; Jing Tian; Linda P Fried
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging.

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Susan E Howlett; Chris MacKnight; B Lynn Beattie; Howard Bergman; Réjean Hébert; David B Hogan; Christina Wolfson; Ian McDowell
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Frailty and the degradation of complex balance dynamics during a dual-task protocol.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Kang; Madalena D Costa; Attila A Priplata; Olga V Starobinets; Ary L Goldberger; Chung-Kang Peng; Dan K Kiely; L Adrienne Cupples; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Multiscale Dynamics of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Fluctuation Links to Functions in Older Adults.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Yurun Cai; Xiaoyan Wu; Baofeng Huang; Yurong Chen; Lilian Zhong; Xia Gao; Yi Guo; Junhong Zhou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-23

2.  Blood Pressure Complexity Discriminates Pathological Beat-to-Beat Variability as a Marker of Vascular Aging.

Authors:  Yun-Kai Lee; Sara Mazzucco; Peter M Rothwell; Stephen J Payne; Alastair J S Webb
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.106

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.