| Literature DB >> 31668703 |
Caroline M Dias1, Jaya Punetha2, Céline Zheng3, Neda Mazaheri4, Abolfazl Rad5, Stephanie Efthymiou6, Andrea Petersen7, Mohammadreza Dehghani8, Davut Pehlivan9, Jennifer N Partlow10, Jennifer E Posey2, Vincenzo Salpietro6, Alper Gezdirici11, Reza Azizi Malamiri12, Nihal M Al Menabawy13, Laila A Selim13, Mohammad Yahya Vahidi Mehrjardi8, Selina Banu14, Daniel L Polla15, Edward Yang16, Jamileh Rezazadeh Varaghchi17, Tadahiro Mitani2, Ellen van Beusekom18, Maryam Najafi19, Alireza Sedaghat20, Jennifer Keller-Ramey21, Leslie Durham7, Zeynep Coban-Akdemir2, Ender Karaca22, Valeria Orlova3, Lieke L M Schaeken18, Amir Sherafat23, Shalini N Jhangiani24, Valentina Stanley25, Gholamreza Shariati26, Hamid Galehdari27, Joseph G Gleeson25, Christopher A Walsh10, James R Lupski28, Elena Seiradake3, Henry Houlden6, Hans van Bokhoven18, Reza Maroofian29.
Abstract
NTNG2 encodes netrin-G2, a membrane-anchored protein implicated in the molecular organization of neuronal circuitry and synaptic organization and diversification in vertebrates. In this study, through a combination of exome sequencing and autozygosity mapping, we have identified 16 individuals (from seven unrelated families) with ultra-rare homozygous missense variants in NTNG2; these individuals present with shared features of a neurodevelopmental disorder consisting of global developmental delay, severe to profound intellectual disability, muscle weakness and abnormal tone, autistic features, behavioral abnormalities, and variable dysmorphisms. The variants disrupt highly conserved residues across the protein. Functional experiments, including in silico analysis of the protein structure, in vitro assessment of cell surface expression, and in vitro knockdown, revealed potential mechanisms of pathogenicity of the variants, including loss of protein function and decreased neurite outgrowth. Our data indicate that appropriate expression of NTNG2 plays an important role in neurotypical development.Entities:
Keywords: NTNG2; autism; developmental delay; intellectual disability; neurodevelopmental disorder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31668703 PMCID: PMC6849109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.09.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025
Figure 1Pedigrees of All Families with Affected Individuals and Variants and Segregation Findings
+ indicates wild-type allele, - indicates variant allele, P indicates proband.
Clinical Features of Affected Individuals
| Individual | IV:2 | IV:3 | IV:1 | IV:2 | IV:3 | IV:1 | IV:2 | II:1 | II:2 | IV:1 | IV:2 | IV:4 | IV:5 | IV:1 | IV:2 | II:1 |
| Age (years) | 18 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 21 | 11 | 1.25 | 9 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 3 |
| Sex | M | F | M | M | F | F | F | F | M | M | M | F | M | M | M | F |
| ID/GDD | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Motor delay | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Language delay | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | + | + | + |
| Autistic features/stereotypy | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | NA | + | + | + | - | + |
| Hyperactivity | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | - |
| Screaming/laughing spells | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | - | + | - | + |
| Self-injury/hand-biting | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bruxism | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | NA | + | + | + | - | - |
| Hypotonia in infancy | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + |
| Nonambulatory | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | - | - | - |
| Brain imaging abnormalities | - | NA | + | NA | NA | - | + | - | NA | NA | NA | + | + | + | + | + |
| Seizures | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | + |
| Microcephaly | - | + | - | + | + | - | - | + | NA | NA | - | + | - | - | - | - |
| Secondary Microcephaly | + | NA | + | NA | NA | |||||||||||
| Dysmorphic features | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | NA | + | + | + | + | + | - |
| Ophthalmologic features | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - |
| GI symptoms | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + |
ID/GDD, intellectual disability/global developmental delay; GI, gastrointestinal; -, absent; +, present; NA, not ascertained/not applicable
Figure 2Clinical Features of Affected Individuals
(A) Representative photographs demonstrating clinical features of affected individuals; these features include facial features, muscular atrophy, and hand stereotypy. Top row from left to right: Family 2 IV:2, IV:3, IV:1; Family 1 IV:3, IV:2. Bottom row: Family 3 IV:1, IV:2; Family 6 IV:2, IV:1; Family 7 II:1.
(B) Representative MRIs of affected individuals, demonstrating decreased brain volume. From top to bottom: Family 6 IV:2; Family 5 IV:4; Family 5 IV:5.
(C) Bar graph summarizing proportions of various clinical findings affecting individuals.
Figure 3Structural Mapping and Cell Surface Expression
(A) Netrin-G2 domain overview. The positions of altered residues relative to the protein domains are indicated. Domain nomenclature is: SP, signal peptide; β-hp, N-terminal β-hairpin domain; EGF, epidermal-growth factor like; GPIa, GPI anchor. Corresponding exons are represented underneath the domain organization in blue.
(B) Full-length model of netrin-G2 based on the crystal structure of the Laminin-like domain and EGF1 (purple) and on homology models of EGF2-4 (gray), in complex with its ligand NGL2 (cyan). The residues that are mutated in the presented variants are indicated as green spheres.
(C) Close-up views of Met149 and Cys456 residues as found in the structural model shown in panel B. For close-up views of the other mutated residues, see Figure S3.
(D) The quantification of the cell surface expression levels of wild type (WT) and mutant netrin-G2 constructs (see panel E) is shown (mean ± SEM). The variants show significantly reduced cell-surface expression compared to the WT (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001).
(E) Netrin-G2 constructs were expressed in HeLa cells with an N-terminal flag tag. Flag-tagged protein was detected via cell-surface immunostaining (magenta). DAPI (blue) highlights cell nuclei. Representative images are shown for WT netrin-G2, untransfected cells (negative control), p.Met149Thr and p.Cys456Tyr variants. Representative images of other variants are shown in Figure S3. Scale bar is 15 μm.
Figure 4Ntng2 Knockdown in N2a Cells
(A) Knockdown of endogenous Ntng2 by Ntng2-specific siRNAs as normalized to control siRNA. Results of quantitative RT-PCR 30 h post-transfection.
(B–D) Effects of Ntng2 knockdown on neurite outgrowth. Data presented as mean and SD; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Quantification was conducted by counting the absolute number of cells with neurites (B), measuring the neurite length by NeuroLucida tracing (C), and quantification of the Convex hull area (D). All analyses show a significant reduction of neurite number and length as a consequence of Ntng2 knockdown.
(E–F) Example of the N2a appearance at 30 h post-transfection with control (E) and Ntng2-specific siRNA (F). Visualization was done using MAP2 counterstaining (red).