| Literature DB >> 33607654 |
Lenin C Kandasamy1, Mina Tsukamoto1, Vitaliy Banov2,3, Sambuu Tsetsegee1, Yutaro Nagasawa1, Mitsuhiro Kato4, Naomichi Matsumoto5, Junji Takeda6, Shigeyoshi Itohara2, Sonoko Ogawa7, Larry J Young8,9, Qi Zhang1,2,8.
Abstract
Posttranslational modification of a protein with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) is a conserved mechanism exists in all eukaryotes. Thus far, >150 human GPI-anchored proteins have been discovered and ~30 enzymes have been reported to be involved in the biosynthesis and maturation of mammalian GPI. Phosphatidylinositol glycan biosynthesis class A protein (PIGA) catalyzes the very first step of GPI anchor biosynthesis. Patients carrying a mutation of the PIGA gene usually suffer from inherited glycosylphosphatidylinositol deficiency (IGD) with intractable epilepsy and intellectual developmental disorder. We generated three mouse models with PIGA deficits specifically in telencephalon excitatory neurons (Ex-M-cko), inhibitory neurons (In-M-cko) or thalamic neurons (Th-H-cko), respectively. Both Ex-M-cko and In-M-cko mice showed impaired long-term fear memory and were more susceptible to kainic acid-induced seizures. In addition, In-M-cko demonstrated a severe limb-clasping phenotype. Hippocampal synapse changes were observed in Ex-M-cko mice. Our Piga conditional knockout mouse models provide powerful tools to understand the cell-type specific mechanisms underlying inherited GPI deficiency and to test different therapeutic modalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33607654 PMCID: PMC8161520 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddab052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150
Figure 1Creation of three Piga conditional knockout mouse lines and confirmation of specific deletion of Piga in different neuronal populations. (A) The construction of Pigaflox mouse. The binding sites of three primers for genotyping and detection of Piga disruption, and that of in situ hybridization probe are indicated. (B) In situ hybridization of Piga in adult mouse brain. (C–E) The X-gal staining of Rosa-NLS-LacZ reporter mice crossed with Emx1-Cre (C), Vgat-Cre (D) and Pkcd-Cre (E) lines, respectively. (F–I) E13.5 embryos with the genotype of PigaWT,Cre+ (F); Pigaflox, Cre+ (G) from the Emx-Cre breeding group and E13.5 embryos with the genotype of PigaWT, Cre+ (H); Pigaflox, Cre+ (I) from the Vagt-Cre breeding group. (J and K) PCR was performed using neuronal DNA from different brain regions with all the three primers (Primers 1–3) indicated in (A). (L and M) In situ hybridization of Piga with Pigaflox, Cre− male control (L) and Th-H-cko (M). Higher magnification of thalamus region of (L) and (M) were shown in (P) and (Q), respectively. (N and O) Immunohistochemistry of netrin-G1 with Pigaflox, Cre− male control (N) and Th-H-cko(O). Higher magnification of cortex region of (N) and (O) were shown in (R) and (S), respectively. Scale bars of (B–E), (L–Q): 1 mm; scale bar of (F–I): 5 mm; scale bar of (R and S):0.5 mm
The mosaic and hemizygous mutants obtained from each cre lines in the first round breeding
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 10 | 45 | 13 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 10 | 37 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 10 | 51 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
|
| ||||||||||
Figure 2The body weight and limb-clasping phenotype in Piga mutants. (A) Body size was compared between In-M-cko mutant and its control littermate of same sex. (B–E) Limb-clasping phenotype in In-M-cko mutants. In-M-cko mutants clasped limbs (B–D) and showed a bat-like posture (E). (F and G) Body weight was compared between Piga mutants and their same sex controls. (H and I) The limb-clasping score was compared between Piga mutants and their same gender controls. In the box charts, the boxes are determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers are determined by the 5th and 95th percentiles. Mean and medium values are shown as the small square and line inside the boxes. Each individual value is plotted beside the box (F–I).
Figure 3Piga mutants showed altered cognition and susceptibility to KA induced seizures. (A) A diagram of fear conditioning test. (B and C) The freezing percentage was compared between Piga mutants and their same sex controls. (D and E) The behavioral seizure score was compared between Piga mutants and their same sex controls. In the line charts, Mean ± SE are indicated for each time point.
The simple effects test result of the contextual fear memory among Ex-M-cko, In-M-cko and control. The Bonferroni test corrected P value of each comparison between the freezing percentage of two genotype groups at each time point in contextual fear memory task.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
Based on estimated marginal means
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
The mean freezing percentage value of Ex-M-cko, In-M-cko and control group at each time point in contextual fear memory task.
| Measure: |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Figure 4Piga mutants showed altered synaptic density and size in hippocampus CA1 (increase font for x-axis). (A–H) Nissl staining of forebrain and cerebellum of WT (A and E), Ex-M-cko (B and F), In-M-cko (C and G) and Th-H-cko (D and H) revealed normal gross brain structure of mutants.(I–L) CO and Nissl staining of tangential sections of somatosensory cortex of Pigaflox, Cre− male control (I and K) and Th-H-cko (J and L) suggested a normal barrel pattern in mutants. (M–P) PSD95 punctate number and punctate size was compared between Ex-M-cko mutants (M) and ‘PigaWT, Cre+’ control mice (N). In the box charts, the boxes are determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers are determined by the 5th and 95th percentiles. Mean and medium values are shown as the small square and line inside the boxes. Each individual value is plotted beside the box (O and P). Scale bar: 1 mm for (A–L); 12.5 μm for (M and N).
The simple effects test result of the seizure score among Ex-M-cko, In-M-cko and control. The Bonferroni test corrected P value of each comparison between the seizure score of two genotype groups at each time point.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
*The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
The mean seizure score of Ex-M-cko, In-M-cko and control group at each time point.
| Measure: |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|