Literature DB >> 31668621

Evolutionary Response to Climate Change in Migratory Pied Flycatchers.

Barbara Helm1, Benjamin M Van Doren2, Dieter Hoffmann3, Ute Hoffmann3.   

Abstract

Climate change is rapidly advancing spring phenology [1-3] but at different rates in different species [1, 4]. Whether these advances are solely driven by phenotypic plasticity [2, 5] or also involve evolution is hotly debated (e.g., [5-7]). In some species, including avian long-distance migrants, plastic responses to early springs may be constrained by inherited circannual timing programs [8, 9], making evolutionary adjustment the only viable mechanism for keeping pace with shifting phenology [5, 10]. This constraint may be contributing to population declines in migratory species [5, 10-12]. To test whether a migrant's timing program has evolved [10, 12], we replicated an experimental study of the annual cycle of long-distance migratory pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) after 21 years of warming. Flycatchers are a model for studying constrained ecological responses to climate change [6, 10, 12, 13]. We show that the phase of the flycatcher circannual clock controlling spring moult, migration, and reproductive timing advanced by 9 days. A nearby wild population mirrored these changes, concurrently advancing egg-laying by 11 days. Furthermore, the time window during which wild flycatcher reproductive timing was most sensitive to ambient temperature advanced by 0.8 days year-1. These results support a role of phenotypic evolution [14] in changing spring phenology [15, 16]. We suggest that the timing programs of long-distance migratory birds may have greater adaptive potential than previously thought, leaving some scope for evolutionary rescue in a changing climate.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeding; circannual; climate change; climate window; evolution; flycatcher; migration; moult; phenology; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31668621     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Migratory strategy drives species-level variation in bird sensitivity to vegetation green-up.

Authors:  Casey Youngflesh; Jacob Socolar; Bruna R Amaral; Ali Arab; Robert P Guralnick; Allen H Hurlbert; Raphael LaFrance; Stephen J Mayor; David A W Miller; Morgan W Tingley
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  The genetic regulation of avian migration timing: combining candidate genes and quantitative genetic approaches in a long-distance migrant.

Authors:  Miloš Krist; Pavel Munclinger; Martins Briedis; Peter Adamík
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Recent natural variability in global warming weakened phenological mismatch and selection on seasonal timing in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Melanie Lindner; Phillip Gienapp; Matthew C Long; Stephanie Jenouvrier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental manipulation of photoperiod influences migration timing in a wild, long-distance migratory songbird.

Authors:  Saeedeh Bani Assadi; Kevin Charles Fraser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  How migratory birds might have tracked past climate change.

Authors:  Benjamin M Van Doren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Clock-linked genes underlie seasonal migratory timing in a diurnal raptor.

Authors:  Christen M Bossu; Julie A Heath; Gregory S Kaltenecker; Barbara Helm; Kristen C Ruegg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  The effects of four decades of climate change on the breeding ecology of an avian sentinel species across a 1,500-km latitudinal gradient are stronger at high latitudes.

Authors:  Marta Lomas Vega; Thord Fransson; Cecilia Kullberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Locally-adapted reproductive photoperiodism determines population vulnerability to climate change in burying beetles.

Authors:  Hsiang-Yu Tsai; Dustin R Rubenstein; Yu-Meng Fan; Tzu-Neng Yuan; Bo-Fei Chen; Yezhong Tang; I-Ching Chen; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Individual variability and versatility in an eco-evolutionary model of avian migration.

Authors:  Kira E Delmore; Benjamin M Van Doren; Greg J Conway; Teja Curk; Tania Garrido-Garduño; Ryan R Germain; Timo Hasselmann; Dieter Hiemer; Henk P van der Jeugd; Hannah Justen; Juan Sebastian Lugo Ramos; Ivan Maggini; Britta S Meyer; Robbie J Phillips; Magdalena Remisiewicz; Graham C M Roberts; Ben C Sheldon; Wolfgang Vogl; Miriam Liedvogel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.