Literature DB >> 34814747

Recent natural variability in global warming weakened phenological mismatch and selection on seasonal timing in great tits (Parus major).

Marcel E Visser1,2, Melanie Lindner1,2, Phillip Gienapp1,3, Matthew C Long4, Stephanie Jenouvrier5.   

Abstract

Climate change has led to phenological shifts in many species, but with large variation in magnitude among species and trophic levels. The poster child example of the resulting phenological mismatches between the phenology of predators and their prey is the great tit (Parus major), where this mismatch led to directional selection for earlier seasonal breeding. Natural climate variability can obscure the impacts of climate change over certain periods, weakening phenological mismatching and selection. Here, we show that selection on seasonal timing indeed weakened significantly over the past two decades as increases in late spring temperatures have slowed down. Consequently, there has been no further advancement in the date of peak caterpillar food abundance, while great tit phenology has continued to advance, thereby weakening the phenological mismatch. We thus show that the relationships between temperature, phenologies of prey and predator, and selection on predator phenology are robust, also in times of a slowdown of warming. Using projected temperatures from a large ensemble of climate simulations that take natural climate variability into account, we show that prey phenology is again projected to advance faster than great tit phenology in the coming decades, and therefore that long-term global warming will intensify phenological mismatches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; great tit; phenology; seasonal timing; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34814747      PMCID: PMC8611334          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

Review 1.  Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Samuel P Caro; Kees van Oers; Sonja V Schaper; Barbara Helm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Estimating the variation, autocorrelation, and environmental sensitivity of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Marcel E Visser; Jarle Tufto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Christiaan Both; Sandra Bouwhuis; C M Lessells; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Population growth in a wild bird is buffered against phenological mismatch.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Vidar Grøtan; Stephanie Jenouvrier; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Why climate change will invariably alter selection pressures on phenology.

Authors:  Phillip Gienapp; Thomas E Reed; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels.

Authors:  Stephen J Thackeray; Peter A Henrys; Deborah Hemming; James R Bell; Marc S Botham; Sarah Burthe; Pierre Helaouet; David G Johns; Ian D Jones; David I Leech; Eleanor B Mackay; Dario Massimino; Sian Atkinson; Philip J Bacon; Tom M Brereton; Laurence Carvalho; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Callan Duck; Martin Edwards; J Malcolm Elliott; Stephen J G Hall; Richard Harrington; James W Pearce-Higgins; Toke T Høye; Loeske E B Kruuk; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim H Sparks; Paul M Thompson; Ian White; Ian J Winfield; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reply to Hausfather and Peters: RCP8.5 is neither problematic nor misleading.

Authors:  Christopher R Schwalm; Spencer Glendon; Philip B Duffy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phenological asynchrony: a ticking time-bomb for seemingly stable populations?

Authors:  Emily G Simmonds; Ella F Cole; Ben C Sheldon; Tim Coulson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Effects of spring temperatures on the strength of selection on timing of reproduction in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp; Arild Husby; Michael Morrisey; Iván de la Hera; Francisco Pulido; Christiaan Both
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  climwin: An R Toolbox for Climate Window Analysis.

Authors:  Liam D Bailey; Martijn van de Pol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Temporal correlations among demographic parameters are ubiquitous but highly variable across species.

Authors:  Rémi Fay; Sandra Hamel; Martijn van de Pol; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; Paul Acker; Matthieu Authier; Benjamin Larue; Christie Le Coeur; Kaitlin R Macdonald; Alex Nicol-Harper; Christophe Barbraud; Christophe Bonenfant; Dirk H Van Vuren; Emmanuelle Cam; Karine Delord; Marlène Gamelon; Maria Moiron; Fanie Pelletier; Jay Rotella; Celine Teplitsky; Marcel E Visser; Caitlin P Wells; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 11.274

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.