OBJECTIVES: Nontraumatic convexal subarachnoid hemorrhages in the elderly can be a manifestation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy associated with a high risk of future intracerebral hemorrhage. The incidence in the elderly population is unknown. Our objectives were to: 1) determine the incidence of convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a population-based study, and, 2) to compare apopolipoprotein-E genotype and amyloid positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for those with versus without hemorrhage. METHODS: Between 11/29/2004 and 3/11/2017, 4462 individuals without hemorrhage at baseline participated in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system to identify intracerebral hemorrhages. Records and images were reviewed to identify convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroimaging characteristics, demographics, medications, and apopolipoprotein-E genotype were recorded. RESULTS: Four cases were identified. The incidence of convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage was 14.1 per 100,000 person years. Three occurred in women, median age, 79 (range: 71-84). One patient had coexisting cerebral microbleeds. Two participants developed a subsequent lobar intracerebral hemorrhage at a median of 4.75 years after convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The apopolipoprotein-E -allele combinations of the 4 were: 3/3, 3/3, 2/2, and 2/3. On Pittsburgh Compound B-PET imaging, median standardized uptake value ratio with convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage was 1.86 (range: 1.38-2.34). CONCLUSIONS: Convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage is rare in the older population, occurring with an incidence of about 14 per 100,000 person years. Yet, when present, it may be associated with a high risk of future intracerebral hemorrhage.
OBJECTIVES: Nontraumatic convexal subarachnoid hemorrhages in the elderly can be a manifestation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy associated with a high risk of future intracerebral hemorrhage. The incidence in the elderly population is unknown. Our objectives were to: 1) determine the incidence of convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a population-based study, and, 2) to compare apopolipoprotein-E genotype and amyloid positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for those with versus without hemorrhage. METHODS: Between 11/29/2004 and 3/11/2017, 4462 individuals without hemorrhage at baseline participated in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system to identify intracerebral hemorrhages. Records and images were reviewed to identify convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroimaging characteristics, demographics, medications, and apopolipoprotein-E genotype were recorded. RESULTS: Four cases were identified. The incidence of convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage was 14.1 per 100,000 person years. Three occurred in women, median age, 79 (range: 71-84). One patient had coexisting cerebral microbleeds. Two participants developed a subsequent lobar intracerebral hemorrhage at a median of 4.75 years after convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The apopolipoprotein-E -allele combinations of the 4 were: 3/3, 3/3, 2/2, and 2/3. On Pittsburgh Compound B-PET imaging, median standardized uptake value ratio with convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage was 1.86 (range: 1.38-2.34). CONCLUSIONS: Convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage is rare in the older population, occurring with an incidence of about 14 per 100,000 person years. Yet, when present, it may be associated with a high risk of future intracerebral hemorrhage.
Authors: S Kumar; R P Goddeau; M H Selim; A Thomas; G Schlaug; A Alhazzani; D E Searls; L R Caplan Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: John V Ly; Shaloo Singhal; Christopher C Rowe; Peter Kempster; Simon Bower; Thanh G Phan Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Eva Martínez-Lizana; María Carmona-Iragui; Daniel Alcolea; Manuel Gómez-Choco; Eduard Vilaplana; María B Sánchez-Saudinós; Jordi Clarimón; Mar Hernández-Guillamon; Josep Munuera; Ellen Gelpi; Beatriz Gómez-Anson; Manel de Juan-Delago; Raquel Delgado-Mederos; Joan Montaner; Angel Ois; Sergi Amaro; Rafael Blesa; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; Alberto Lleó; Juan Fortea Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: M Edip Gurol; Gregory Dierksen; Rebecca Betensky; Christopher Gidicsin; Amy Halpin; Alex Becker; Jeremy Carmasin; Alison Ayres; Kristin Schwab; Anand Viswanathan; David Salat; Jonathan Rosand; Keith A Johnson; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andreas Charidimou; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Jamary Oliveira-Filho; Matthew Frosch; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison Ayres; Jonathan Rosand; Mahmut Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Walter A Rocca; Barbara P Yawn; Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; L Joseph Melton Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: M Edip Gurol; J Alex Becker; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Grace Riley; Kristin Schwab; Keith A Johnson; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jonathan Graff-Radford; Timothy G Lesnick; Michelle M Mielke; Eleni Constantopoulos; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Scott A Przybelski; Prashanthi Vemuri; Hugo Botha; David T Jones; Vijay K Ramanan; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci; R Ross Reichard Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472