Literature DB >> 31667733

Increased 14C-acetate accumulation in IDH-mutated human glioblastoma: implications for detecting IDH-mutated glioblastoma with 11C-acetate PET imaging.

Sho Koyasu1,2,3, Yoichi Shimizu4, Akiyo Morinibu5, Tsuneo Saga4, Yuji Nakamoto4, Kaori Togashi4, Hiroshi Harada5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, the potential value of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation as a prognostic marker in glioblastomas has been established. Glioblastomas are classified by their IDH mutation status under the 2016 WHO classification system. However, noninvasive diagnostic methods for the mutation status in glioblastoma patients have not been established so far. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference of acetate metabolism between in glioblastomas with wild-type IDH and in those with IDH mutation by comparing the uptake of 14C-acetate using genetically engineered glioblastoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo.
METHODS: We established glioblastoma cells (U251) expressing IDH1 R132H and examined the cell uptake of [1-14C]acetate. Biodistribution studies and an autoradiographic study for U251 cell tumor-bearing mice (BALB/c-nu/nu) with or without the IDH1 mutation were performed 1 h after [1-14C]acetate administration.
RESULTS: Significantly higher uptake of [1-14C]acetate was observed in U251/IDH1 R132H cells than in U251/IDH1 wild-type cells both in vitro (10.11 ± 0.94 vs. 4.26 ± 0.95%dose/mg, p = 0.0047) and in vivo (0.97 ± 0.14 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05%ID/g; p = 0.0037). Tumor-to-muscle ratios were also significantly higher in U251/IDH1 R132H tumors (3.36 ± 0.41 vs. 1.88 ± 0.59, p = 0.0030). The autoradiographic study shows the entirely higher radioactivity of the U251/IDH1 R132H tumor tissue section than that of the U251/IDH1 Wild-type tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that the uptake of radiolabeled acetate was significantly higher in IDH-mutated cells than in IDH-wild-type cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-Hydroxyglutarate; Acetate PET; Glioblastoma; Isocitrate dehydrogenase; Mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667733     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03322-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  19 in total

1.  The roles of 11C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Dongwoo Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Mi-Ae Park; Jong Hee Chang; Mijin Yun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Re-evaluation of the diagnostic performance of 11C-methionine PET/CT according to the 2016 WHO classification of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Dongwoo Kim; Joong-Hyun Chun; Se Hoon Kim; Ju Hyung Moon; Seok-Gu Kang; Jong Hee Chang; Mijin Yun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ovidiu C Andronesi; Grace S Kim; Elizabeth Gerstner; Tracy Batchelor; Aria A Tzika; Valeria R Fantin; Matthew G Vander Heiden; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Lenny Dang; David W White; Stefan Gross; Bryson D Bennett; Mark A Bittinger; Edward M Driggers; Valeria R Fantin; Hyun Gyung Jang; Shengfang Jin; Marie C Keenan; Kevin M Marks; Robert M Prins; Patrick S Ward; Katharine E Yen; Linda M Liau; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Shinsan M Su
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET.

Authors:  Y Yamamoto; Y Nishiyama; N Kimura; R Kameyama; N Kawai; T Hatakeyama; M Kaji; M Ohkawa
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Tatsuro Tsuchida; Hiroaki Takeuchi; Hidehiko Okazawa; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Yasuhisa Fujibayashi
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 7.  Oncometabolites: linking altered metabolism with cancer.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Tomoyoshi Soga; Patrick J Pollard
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Detection of 2-Hydroxyglutarate as a Biomarker for IDH Mutation in Gliomas.

Authors:  Thomas Leather; Michael D Jenkinson; Kumar Das; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2017-06-19

9.  Glioma cells showing IDH1 mutation cannot be propagated in standard cell culture conditions.

Authors:  S Piaskowski; M Bienkowski; E Stoczynska-Fidelus; R Stawski; M Sieruta; M Szybka; W Papierz; M Wolanczyk; D J Jaskolski; P P Liberski; P Rieske
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  In Vivo Imaging of Glutamine Metabolism to the Oncometabolite 2-Hydroxyglutarate in IDH1/2 Mutant Tumors.

Authors:  Lucia Salamanca-Cardona; Hardik Shah; Alex J Poot; Fabian M Correa; Valentina Di Gialleonardo; Hui Lui; Vesselin Z Miloushev; Kristin L Granlund; Sui S Tee; Justin R Cross; Craig B Thompson; Kayvan R Keshari
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 31.373

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current biomarker-associated procedures of cancer modeling-a reference in the context of IDH1 mutant glioma.

Authors:  Narges Zare Mehrjardi; Daniel Hänggi; Ulf Dietrich Kahlert
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.469

2.  Multi-tracer and multiparametric PET imaging to detect the IDH mutation in glioma: a preclinical translational in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo study.

Authors:  Alexandra Clément; Timothee Zaragori; Romain Filosa; Olga Ovdiichuk; Marine Beaumont; Charlotte Collet; Emilie Roeder; Baptiste Martin; Fatiha Maskali; Muriel Barberi-Heyob; Celso Pouget; Matthieu Doyen; Antoine Verger
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Jan-Michael Werner; Philipp Lohmann; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Molecular and Cellular Complexity of Glioma. Focus on Tumour Microenvironment and the Use of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers to Overcome Treatment Resistance.

Authors:  Silvia Valtorta; Daniela Salvatore; Paolo Rainone; Sara Belloli; Gloria Bertoli; Rosa Maria Moresco
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  A perspective on the radiopharmaceutical requirements for imaging and therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julie Bolcaen; Janke Kleynhans; Shankari Nair; Jeroen Verhoeven; Ingeborg Goethals; Mike Sathekge; Charlot Vandevoorde; Thomas Ebenhan
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.