Literature DB >> 31667491

Cellular and Widefield Imaging of Sound Frequency Organization in Primary and Higher Order Fields of the Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Sandra Romero1, Ariel E Hight1, Kameron K Clayton1, Jennifer Resnik1,2, Ross S Williamson1,2, Kenneth E Hancock1,2, Daniel B Polley1,2.   

Abstract

The mouse auditory cortex (ACtx) contains two core fields-primary auditory cortex (A1) and anterior auditory field (AAF)-arranged in a mirror reversal tonotopic gradient. The best frequency (BF) organization and naming scheme for additional higher order fields remain a matter of debate, as does the correspondence between smoothly varying global tonotopy and heterogeneity in local cellular tuning. Here, we performed chronic widefield and two-photon calcium imaging from the ACtx of awake Thy1-GCaMP6s reporter mice. Data-driven parcellation of widefield maps identified five fields, including a previously unidentified area at the ventral posterior extreme of the ACtx (VPAF) and a tonotopically organized suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF) that extended laterally as far as ectorhinal cortex. Widefield maps were stable over time, where single pixel BFs fluctuated by less than 0.5 octaves throughout a 1-month imaging period. After accounting for neuropil signal and frequency tuning strength, BF organization in neighboring layer 2/3 neurons was intermediate to the heterogeneous salt and pepper organization and the highly precise local organization that have each been described in prior studies. Multiscale imaging data suggest there is no ultrasonic field or secondary auditory cortex in the mouse. Instead, VPAF and a dorsal posterior (DP) field emerged as the strongest candidates for higher order auditory areas.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calcium imaging; map; mesoscale; tonotopy; two-photon

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31667491      PMCID: PMC7132909          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  91 in total

1.  Modular organization of intrinsic connections associated with spectral tuning in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  H L Read; J A Winer; C E Schreiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thalamic label patterns suggest primary and ventral auditory fields are distinct core regions.

Authors:  Douglas A Storace; Nathan C Higgins; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Removable cranial windows for long-term imaging in awake mice.

Authors:  Glenn J Goldey; Demetris K Roumis; Lindsey L Glickfeld; Aaron M Kerlin; R Clay Reid; Vincent Bonin; Dorothy P Schafer; Mark L Andermann
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Functional organization and population dynamics in the mouse primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gideon Rothschild; Israel Nelken; Adi Mizrahi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Behavioral relevance helps untangle natural vocal categories in a specific subset of core auditory cortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Kathryn N Shepard; Frank G Lin; Charles L Zhao; Kelly K Chong; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Homeostatic Control of Spontaneous Activity in the Developing Auditory System.

Authors:  Travis A Babola; Sally Li; Alexandra Gribizis; Brian J Lee; John B Issa; Han Chin Wang; Michael C Crair; Dwight E Bergles
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Axon guidance in the auditory system: multiple functions of Eph receptors.

Authors:  K S Cramer; M L Gabriele
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Flexible Sensory Representations in Auditory Cortex Driven by Behavioral Relevance.

Authors:  Hiroyuki K Kato; Shea N Gillet; Jeffry S Isaacson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Parallel processing by cortical inhibition enables context-dependent behavior.

Authors:  Kishore V Kuchibhotla; Jonathan V Gill; Grace W Lindsay; Eleni S Papadoyannis; Rachel E Field; Tom A Hindmarsh Sten; Kenneth D Miller; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  18 in total

1.  Complexity of frequency receptive fields predicts tonotopic variability across species.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Mariangela Panniello; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Johannes C Dahmen; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Neuromodulatory Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Gain Control in Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Patrick A Cody; Thanos Tzounopoulos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Neural signatures of auditory hypersensitivity following acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Matthew McGill; Ariel E Hight; Yurika L Watanabe; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Dongqin Cai; Kameron Clayton; Kenneth E Hancock; Anne Takesian; Sharon G Kujawa; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Auditory Corticothalamic Neurons Are Recruited by Motor Preparatory Inputs.

Authors:  Kameron K Clayton; Ross S Williamson; Kenneth E Hancock; Gen-Ichi Tasaka; Adi Mizrahi; Troy A Hackett; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Spatially Distributed Representation of Taste Quality in the Gustatory Insular Cortex of Behaving Mice.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Joshua F Kogan; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Inverted central auditory hierarchies for encoding local intervals and global temporal patterns.

Authors:  Meenakshi M Asokan; Ross S Williamson; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Sparse Coding in Temporal Association Cortex Improves Complex Sound Discriminability.

Authors:  L Feigin; G Tasaka; I Maor; A Mizrahi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cochlear neural degeneration disrupts hearing in background noise by increasing auditory cortex internal noise.

Authors:  Jennifer Resnik; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Behavioral Approaches to Study Top-Down Influences on Active Listening.

Authors:  Kameron K Clayton; Meenakshi M Asokan; Yurika Watanabe; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  PIEZO2 mediates ultrasonic hearing via cochlear outer hair cells in mice.

Authors:  Jie Li; Shuang Liu; Chenmeng Song; Qun Hu; Zhikai Zhao; Tuantuan Deng; Yi Wang; Tong Zhu; Linzhi Zou; Shufeng Wang; Jiaofeng Chen; Lian Liu; Hanqing Hou; Kexin Yuan; Hairong Zheng; Zhiyong Liu; Xiaowei Chen; Wenzhi Sun; Bailong Xiao; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.