Literature DB >> 31667103

Improved biodegradation of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds from the air stream in a multilayer biofilter.

Mehdi Mokhtari1, Yaghoub Hajizadeh2, Negar Jafari2, Ali Asghar Ebrahimi1, Ali Abdolahnejad1.   

Abstract

Biofiltration of n-hexane as a representative of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at presence and absence of rhamnolipid biosurfactant was studied using a multilayer biofilter packed with scoria, compost, poplar tree skin and sugar beet pulp, for 131 days. The concentration of n-hexane was measured by a gas chromatograph coupled with a flame ionization detector (GC/FID). The results showed that the mean removal efficiency (RE) of n-hexane at the presence of the biosurfactant was two times higher than that at absence of the biosurfactant. According to the results, rhamnolipid can enhance the efficiency of biofiltration of VOCs from polluted air streams.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodegradation; Biofiltration; Improved biodegradation with a multilayer biofilter; Rhamnolipid; VOCs

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667103      PMCID: PMC6812370          DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MethodsX        ISSN: 2215-0161


Specification Table Value of the Protocol Biofiltration of VOCs is only dependent on its own gas solubility and bioavailability [2,3]. Thus, these pollutants are usually poorly removed by biofiltration [4,5,6]. The application of a chemical or biological surfactant can be one of the practical options to enhance the bioavailability and solubility of hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) [7,8,9,10]. Rhamnolipids are anionic bio-surfactants which are produced by Pseudomonas sp. Bacteria. Biosurfactants compare to chemical surfactants are more effective, less toxic, environmentally friendly and more biodegradable. It increases the water solubility of HOCs and thereby facilitates the biodegradation of these compounds [11,12,13,14].

Description of protocol

Biofilter set-up and operation

The biofilter was included a stainless steel column with 120 cm height, 15 cm inner diameter and effective volume of15.8 L (three sections, each 40 cm height (Fig. 1). Airflow was supplied by a 150 L compressor. Four different mixtures of materials consisted of 40% compost, 20% scoria, 20% sugar beet pulp, and 20% poplar tree skin were used as packing materials in the biofilter. More details are available in our previous study [1]. After the start-up phase, the performance of biofilter in various operational conditions at presence and absence of the biosurfactant was surveyed during the operation period (131 days in 6 phases). Operating conditions of each phase are presented in Table 1. To decrease the adaptation time of microorganisms in the biofilter bed, fresh activated sludge of the wastewater treatment plant was used as an inoculum source for the biofilter bed.
Fig. 1

Schematic of the laboratory scale biofilter.

Table 1

Summary of operational conditions of the biofilter.

Phase of operationEBRT (s)BiosurfactantadditionInlet concentration range (gm−3)Inlet loading range (gm−3 h-1)Operation time (day)Sample size(Number)*
Start-up120NO0.18–0.416.2–14.083162
I120NO0.19 - 0.986.7–33.42550
II60NO0.21–1.0114.25–68.52346
III30NO0.18–1.025.7–137.12346
IV120YES0.24–0.868.4–29.32040
V60YES0.18–1.0312.91–70.62040
VI30YES0.19–0.9927.03–135.342040

Samples were taken and analyzed in duplicate.

Schematic of the laboratory scale biofilter. Summary of operational conditions of the biofilter. Samples were taken and analyzed in duplicate.

Chemicals

N-hexane and all the other chemicals for preparation of the nutrient solution were obtained from Merck Company (with a purity 99%). The composition of the nutrient solution (per liter of distilled water) was as follow: 0.5 g NaCl, 0.1 g NaHCO3 (for control of pH in the liquid medium), 0.15 g KH2PO4, 0.3 g MgSO4, 0.01 g FeSO4, 0.5 g NH3SO4,1.9 g ClNH4, 0.03 g MnSO4, 0.03 g ZnSO4 [1,15]. Rhamnolipid biosurfactant with a purity of 95.0% was obtained from Institute of chemical engineering of Iran (ICEI). The concentrations of 50, 100, 200 and 300 mg/l of the biosurfactant were prepared in nutrient solution and individually introduced to the biofilter in optimum EBRT (120 s). After application, 300 mg/l was selected as an optimal concentration of rhamnolipid and used in the rest of the experiments.

Analytical methods

Concentrations of n-hexane in inlet and outlet of the biofilter were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with an FID (GC/FID, Varian CP-3800, USA) with column details of 15.0 m ×0.25 mm ×0.45 μm (CP-sil5 CB). The temperature of the detector was set to 280 °C. Nitrogen (N2) at a flow rate of 1.2 and 25 ml min−1 was used as a carrier and make-up gas, respectively. The injector temperature was constant at 200 °C. More details are available in our previous study [1]. For draw up of the calibration curves, various concentrations of n-hexane were injected into glass bottles sealed with a Teflon and analyzed after stabilization. For measurement of n-hexane concentrations, any time 0.5 ml of gas was injected into the GC-FID with a gas-tight syringe (Hamilton, USA). Total air samples taken from inlet and outlet of the biofilter during the operation period (131 days; without the start-up period) was 262. To evaluate the removal efficiency of n-hexane in the biofilter, two samples were taken daily and the mean values of them were used for the calculation of removal efficiency and elimination capacity.

Effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactant on the performance of the biofilter

The trend of removal efficiency (RE) and elimination capacity (EC) of n-hexane with and without the biosurfactant in different inlet loading rate (IL) was illustrated in Fig. 2. The removal efficiency of n-hexane in the biofilter without addition of rhamnolipid was 46.8%, whereas, with the addition of rhamnolipid, the removal efficiency was increased. So that, in concentrations of 50, 100, 200 and 300 mg/l rhamnolipid, the removal efficiency reached to 47.26%, 56.76%, 73.24% and 85.13%, respectively. There is a positive linear relationship between the solubility of HOCs and the biosurfactant concentrations. Therefore, with increasing the concentration of the biosurfactant the removal percentage of n-hexane was increased [1,16].
Fig. 2

Influence of rhamnolipid biosurfactant on n-hexane removal efficiency, elimination capacity and CO2 production.

Influence of rhamnolipid biosurfactant on n-hexane removal efficiency, elimination capacity and CO2 production.

Conclusions

Single biofilter due to low water solubility and low bioavailability of HOCs has not high removal efficiency for n-hexane. Our results confirmed that introduction of rhamnolipid as a proper biosurfactant to the biofilter media with favorable concentration can notably increase the removal efficiency of HOCs from the air stream. So that, in our study, the mean removal efficiency of n-hexane by adding rhamnolipid biosurfactant to the biofilter media and under optimum EBRT (120 s) was increased from 46.8% to 85.13%. Because rhamnolipid biosurfactant by reducing surface tension and causing micelles formation can increase the water solubility and bioavailability of HOCs for microorganisms in the biofilter media.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors of this article declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Subject Area:Environmental Science
More specific subject area:Air pollution control
Protocol name:Improved biodegradation with multilayer biofilter
Reagents/tools:GC/FID, model: Varian CP-3800, USA, column characteristics: type: CP-sil5 CB, column: 15.0 m × 0.25 mm × 0.45 μm, injector characteristics: the injector temperature was constant at 200 °C, carrier gas: Nitrogen (N2) at a flow rate of 1.2 ml min−1, make-up gas: nitrogen (N2) at a flow-rate of 25 ml min−1.
Experimental design:All sampling and parameters analysis were measured according to in our previous study [1].
Trial registration:Not required
Ethics:Not required

Biofiltration of VOCs is only dependent on its own gas solubility and bioavailability [2,3].

Thus, these pollutants are usually poorly removed by biofiltration [4,5,6].

The application of a chemical or biological surfactant can be one of the practical options to enhance the bioavailability and solubility of hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) [7,8,9,10].

Rhamnolipids are anionic bio-surfactants which are produced by Pseudomonas sp. Bacteria. Biosurfactants compare to chemical surfactants are more effective, less toxic, environmentally friendly and more biodegradable. It increases the water solubility of HOCs and thereby facilitates the biodegradation of these compounds [11,12,13,14].

  10 in total

Review 1.  Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review.

Authors:  Xuhui Mao; Rui Jiang; Wei Xiao; Jiaguo Yu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 2.  Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds.

Authors:  Yan Cheng; Huijun He; Chunping Yang; Guangming Zeng; Xiang Li; Hong Chen; Guanlong Yu
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 3.  Simultaneous Removal of Multicomponent VOCs in Biofilters.

Authors:  Chunping Yang; Hui Qian; Xiang Li; Yan Cheng; Huijun He; Guangming Zeng; Jinying Xi
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Enhancing ethylbenzene vapors degradation in a hybrid system based on photocatalytic oxidation UV/TiO2-In and a biofiltration process.

Authors:  M Hinojosa-Reyes; V Rodríguez-González; S Arriaga
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Effect of saponins on n-hexane removal in biotrickling filters.

Authors:  Yanhong Tu; Chunping Yang; Yan Cheng; Guangming Zeng; Li Lu; Lu Wang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Remediation of hexachlorobenzene contaminated soils by rhamnolipid enhanced soil washing coupled with activated carbon selective adsorption.

Authors:  Jinzhong Wan; Lina Chai; Xiaohua Lu; Yusuo Lin; Shengtian Zhang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil.

Authors:  Chin-Chi Lai; Yi-Chien Huang; Yu-Hong Wei; Jo-Shu Chang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Effect of substrate Henry's constant on biofilter performance.

Authors:  Xueqing Zhu; Makram T Suidan; Amy Pruden; Chunping Yang; Cristina Alonso; Byung J Kim; Byung R Kim
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Differences of cell surface characteristics between the bacterium Pseudomonas veronii and fungus Ophiostoma stenoceras and their different adsorption properties to hydrophobic organic compounds.

Authors:  Zhuowei Cheng; Xiaomin Zhang; Christian Kennes; Jianmeng Chen; Dongzhi Chen; Jiexu Ye; Shihan Zhang; Dionysios D Dionysiou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Enhanced ex situ bioremediation of crude oil contaminated beach sand by supplementation with nutrients and rhamnolipids.

Authors:  M Nikolopoulou; N Pasadakis; H Norf; N Kalogerakis
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.553

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Photocatalytic Oxidation of PLA/TiO2-Composite Films for Indoor Air Purification.

Authors:  Pattamaphon Chanklom; Torpong Kreetachat; Rotruedee Chotigawin; Kowit Suwannahong
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-19

2.  Effect of photocatalytic pretreatment on the biodegradation of n-hexane vapours in a biofilter.

Authors:  Yaghoub Hajizadeh; Negar Jafari; Mehdi Mokhtari; Amir Mohammadi; Seyed Mojtaba Momtaz; Farzad Fanaei; Ali Abdolahnejad
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-07-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.