Literature DB >> 31667039

Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density in Mexican Patients with Breast Cancer.

Ana Amador Martínez1, Eleazar Lara Padilla2, Juan Antonio Pérez Rodríguez1, Alfonso Alfaro3, Dania Guadalupe Solis Cano1, Cindy Bandala2, Nancy Guzman1.   

Abstract

Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently reported cancer among women - reported in 2012 as 25% of all cancers. BC has been related to the increased life and activity of osteoclasts, conferring a higher risk for osteoporosis/osteopenia. This study aimed to determine a cut-off point in Hounsfield units (HU) as well as the sensitivity and specificity of computed axial tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia in Mexican women with BC. Material and methods We included 108 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of BC treated at the ABC Medical Center in Mexico City. All patients were subjected to both dual X-ray densitometry and CT. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the cutoff point and sensitivity and specificity were calculated, as were confidence intervals for the diagnoses of osteoporosis/osteopenia. Results The mean age was 58.49 ± 11.01 years. The cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (82%) and specificity (68%) was <157 HU for osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients with BC. Conclusions Women with BC are exposed to several risk factors for osteoporosis/osteopenia. The CT obtained for the general evaluation of these patients can also be used to evaluate bone mineral density, avoiding additional examinations and exposure to radiation, as well as the cost it confers, offering an earlier diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia for its control.
Copyright © 2019, Amador Martínez et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; breast cancer; hounsfield units

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667039      PMCID: PMC6816528          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  29 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of osteoporosis in women with a history of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Catherine Van Poznak; Nicholas P Sauter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Christopher John Burke; Manjiri M Didolkar; Huiman X Barnhart; Emily N Vinson
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

3.  Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.

Authors:  E S Siris; P D Miller; E Barrett-Connor; K G Faulkner; L E Wehren; T A Abbott; M L Berger; A C Santora; L M Sherwood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Tobias Roth; Martin Gschwentner; Armin Suckert; Michael Blauth; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Using Hounsfield Units to Assess Osteoporotic Status on Wrist Computed Tomography Scans: Comparison With Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Elizabeth B Gausden; Andrew J Weiland; Joseph M Lane; Joseph J Schreiber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Osteoporosis and skeletal fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Michael K Shindle; Matthew H Griffith; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Antineoplastic treatment effect on bone mineral density in Mexican breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karina Monroy-Cisneros; Julián Esparza-Romero; Mauro E Valencia; Alfonso G Guevara-Torres; Rosa O Méndez-Estrada; Iván Anduro-Corona; Humberto Astiazarán-García
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Does adjuvant chemotherapy change bone mineral density and related serum biomarkers in women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Reza Safaei-Nodehi; Javad Esmaili; Ramazanali Sharifian; Shafieh Movaseghi; Sayeh Parkhideh
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2017
View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of histogram analysis in diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Jin; Yan Zhang; Jing-Liang Cheng; Xiao-Pan Zhang; Ying Hu; Xiao-Ning Shao
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.