Literature DB >> 31667025

Development of SSR markers for Astragalus lehmannianus, a vulnerable species from northwestern China.

Mingying Wu1, Xiaojun Shi1, Dunyan Tan1,2.   

Abstract

PREMISE: Astragalus lehmannianus (Fabaceae) is a vulnerable species found in the cold deserts of northwestern China. We aimed to characterize polymorphic microsatellite loci for A. lehmannianus to support future studies of population genetic dynamics and conservation management of the species. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used next-generation sequencing to detect polymorphic microsatellites. Twenty-five potential microsatellite loci were identified, 12 of which were polymorphic and present in the three study populations of A. lehmannianus. Levels of observed and expected heterozygosities were 0.000-1.000 and 0.000-0.827, respectively. Furthermore, two and five of the 12 developed primers were successfully amplified in two congeneric species, A. arpilobus and A. oxyglottis, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These newly developed microsatellite markers can be used to determine population diversity and to develop conservation strategies in A. lehmannianus.
© 2019 Wu et al. Applications in Plant Sciences is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Botanical Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Astragalus lehmannianus; Fabacaeae; conservation; microsatellite marker; vulnerable species

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667025      PMCID: PMC6814180          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Astragalus lehmannianus Bunge (Fabaceae) is a vulnerable perennial herb in China that is distributed only on stationary and semi‐stationary dunes on the southern margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XJ), northwestern China (Fu, 1993; Shen, 2011). This species is threatened by anthropological disturbances and has been listed in the first group of key protected plants in XJ (Li, 2015). An extensive field survey covering the distribution area of A. lehmannianus in China was made from 2013 to 2017, and only six populations were confirmed to be extant. Furthermore, the locations of A. lehmannianus populations are fragmented and isolated from each other. Although the biochemistry and seed predation of this species have been reported (Mestechkina et al., 2000; Han et al., 2018), genetic information remains unknown. Fragmented endangered species with restricted geographic distribution tend to have low levels of genetic diversity within populations, and restricted gene flow and increased genetic differentiation among populations (Wall et al., 2014). If endangered and vulnerable species are unprotected, their lower genetic diversity can significantly decrease the chances of survival in changing environments (Frankham, 2010). Effective protection of rare and endangered species often takes advantage of the genetic diversity information of the species (Selyutina et al., 2016). Microsatellite markers developed in A. holmgreniorum Barneby (King et al., 2012), A. camptodontus Franch. (Zhang et al., 2013), A. mongholicus Bunge (Wang et al., 2013), A. michauxii (Kuntze) F. J. Herm. (Wall et al., 2014), and A. bibullatus Barneby & E. L. Bridges (Morris et al., 2016) were not found to be polymorphic for A. lehmannianus in preliminary tests. Therefore, we developed 12 variable microsatellite markers using the restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (RAD‐Seq) approach from the genome of A. lehmannianus and also tested the transferability of these markers to the congeneric species A. arpilobus Kar. & Kir. and A. oxyglottis Steven ex M. Bieb. These markers will provide useful tools for population genetics and demographic history of current populations of A. lehmannianus and related species. Furthermore, the study of genetic diversity using these markers will contribute to the formulation of conservation strategies for A. lehmannianus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves of A. lehmannianus plants collected from three natural populations in XJ (Jimsar County [G], Fukang City [C], Jimsar County [J]; Appendix 1) on the southern margin of the Gurbantunggut Desert, following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method of Doyle and Doyle (1987) with the centrifugal time extended for 3–5 min. The RAD‐Seq libraries were created by Huashibaiao Biotech Company (Beijing, China) to generate the simple sequence repeat (SSR) information. Our selections were di‐, tri‐, and tetranucleotide motifs with flanking regions larger than 100 bp and a minimum of 10, six, and four repeats, respectively. A total of 165 primer pairs, which were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA) and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), were obtained and tested for amplification. We attached the universal M13 sequence (TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT) tag to the 5′ end of the forward primer using the method described by Schuelke (2000) to label the products with fluorescence. Designed primers were tested on 65 samples of A. lehmannianus. To examine cross‐species amplification, 10 individuals each of A. arpilobus and A. oxyglottis were collected from the Gurbantunggut Desert in the same general locality from which samples of A. lehmannianus were collected. PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 1 μL of template DNA with an initial concentration of 100 ng/μL, 7.9 μL of ddH2O, 12.5 μL of 2× Power Taq PCR MasterMix (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), 0.4 μL of TP‐M13 forward primer, and 1.6 μL of each reverse primer and universal M13 sequencing primer labeled with either HEX or 6‐FAM. All candidate primer pairs were tested by a touchdown PCR protocol in the following procedure: 94°C for 4 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 65–55°C (Δ1°C touchdown per cycle) for 50 s, 72°C for 40 s; 30 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 55°C for 45 s, 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 6 min. The amplified products were tested on 1.5% agarose gel and 6% polyacrylamide gel. The size of the amplified fragments was measured with an ABI 3730xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), and allele sizes were scored using the software GeneMarker version 1.51 (Applied Biosystems). Twelve polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed and used on 65 individuals of A. lehmannianus from different populations (Table 1). An additional 13 monomorphic microsatellite markers were developed but not used (Appendix 2). Population genetic parameters, including number of alleles, levels of observed and expected heterozygosity, the inbreeding coefficient, and departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, were calculated using GenAlEx version 6.5 software (Peakall and Smouse, 2012). Linkage disequilibrium was analyzed with GENEPOP version 4.6.9 (Rousset, 2008).
Table 1

Characteristics of the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed in Astragalus lehmannianus

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)Fluorescent dyeGenBank accession no.
AL23 F: AGTGCCTGAACAGTTACAAACCAAGA (TC)20 146–1626‐FAM MK606235
R: GGAAGAAAATGCAGCCATCA  
AL26 F: CTATAATAGCGGTGATGAAGGGAAC (GA)25 132–1586‐FAM MK606236
R: GTACCCGCGAGAAATCTTGTT  
AL35 F: GGTTTTAAACGTGAATTTAGTTGCC (TA)12 143–1596‐FAM MK606237
R: GTCTTTCTTTTAAAGATGTTTTC  
AL41 F: CCATAGAGATTTTAGGTTCAG (TA)20 128–156HEX MK606238
R: CAGTATGTTTTGGTGTATT  
AL42 F: AACAAGCAATCTATGTGCCCC (AAT)10 139–1546‐FAM MK606239
R: TCGAACCTAACTCAGACTGCA  
AL43 F: CAAGCAACTGTATTGGTGCA (TA)13 144–154HEX MK606240
R: CCTTCCACTACACATTTCAC  
AL50 F: CCCATTACAAGATATATTGCC (AT)16 148–1646‐FAM MK606241
R: GCAAGAATCCTGCCGATTTT  
AL52 F: TTCAGGAGCACTGCAAAGGTT (TA)17 137–1676‐FAM MK606242
R: GAGTTAGCATCTAAGAAAACA  
AL53 F: AATTCCTTTCAGATGGGAGC (AG)12 130–1506‐FAM MK606243
R: TTGCTTAAAGCTTGCTGCCT  
AL54 F: TCAGAGGGTCTAATTGGCTTC (TA)17 130–150HEX MK606244
R: AGTTAGGCGTTAGCCTTACGT  
AL59 F: AAAAGGATTGACCAATTCAGC (CA)15 122–1566‐FAM MK606245
R: GGAAAGAAGGCAATTATGCTC  
AL65 F: AAGCGACATTTTGTCCTGTC (TA)18 140–1486‐FAM MK606246
R: CGTAAAAAATTAAAAGCGG  

A touchdown PCR protocol was used rather than locus‐specific annealing temperatures.

Characteristics of the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed in Astragalus lehmannianus A touchdown PCR protocol was used rather than locus‐specific annealing temperatures. The 12 loci were polymorphic in the three populations, with two to 11 alleles (mean 5.17) in population G, two to 10 alleles (mean 4.92) in population C, and one to five alleles (mean 2.83) in population J. The levels of mean observed and expected heterozygosities, respectively, were 0.507 (range 0.107–0.893) and 0.566 (range 0.249–0.827) in population G, 0.547 (range 0.094–0.938) and 0.505 (range 0.253–0.792) in population C, and 0.567 (range 0.000–1.000) and 0.497 (range 0.000–0.800) in population J (Table 2). A total of nine loci in population G and eight loci in population C deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. This deviation may be due to inbreeding or a low number of samples selected for the study. There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium between any loci in any of the three populations, indicating that all of the loci were independent and could potentially be used in studies of genetic diversity.
Table 2

Measures of genetic variation for the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three populations of Astragalus lehmannianus.a

LociPopulation G (n = 28)Population C (n = 32)Population J (n = 5)
A H o H e b Amplification success (%) A H o H e b Amplification success (%) A H o H e b Amplification success (%)
AL2370.3570.783*** 10050.3810.371ns 10020.8000.480ns 100
AL2640.2500.336*** 10040.1880.253*** 10020.8000.480ns 100
AL3530.1430.249*** 10040.3750.322ns 10010.0000.00060
AL4160.8930.726** 10070.9380.678*** 10051.0000.800ns 100
AL4220.4640.448ns 10020.4380.430ns 10020.4000.320ns 100
AL4330.1070.331*** 10030.0940.274*** 10030.4000.340ns 100
AL5060.4440.604*** 96.870.5940.628ns 10030.4000.460ns 100
AL5290.3930.814*** 10070.1250.604*** 10030.0000.640* 100
AL5320.8930.499*** 10020.9060.500*** 10030.8000.580ns 100
AL5470.8210.827ns 10060.8440.715*** 10030.4000.620ns 100
AL59110.7860.788ns 100100.8440.792* 10051.0000.760ns 100
AL6520.5360.392*** 10020.9380.498*** 10020.8000.480ns 100
Mean5.170.5070.56699.74.920.5470.5051002.830.5670.49796.7

A = observed number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled.

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not significant.

Measures of genetic variation for the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three populations of Astragalus lehmannianus.a A = observed number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled. Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1. Deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not significant. Cross‐species amplification using the microsatellites developed for A. lehmannianus was successful for two of the 12 loci (AL42 and AL53) in A. arpilobus and for five of the 12 loci (AL26, AL41, AL50, AL52, and AL54) in A. oxyglottis (Table 3). This weakly successful cross‐species amplification may be due to the relatively high genetic differentiation among the three species.
Table 3

Results of cross‐amplification (allele size ranges) for the 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Astragalus lehmannianus in two related Astragalus species.a

Locus A. arpilobus A. oxyglottis
AL23
AL26134–136
AL35
AL41151–157
AL42138–144
AL43
AL50134
AL52136
AL53136
AL54130–148
AL59
AL65

— = failed amplification.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Results of cross‐amplification (allele size ranges) for the 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Astragalus lehmannianus in two related Astragalus species.a — = failed amplification. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide 12 microsatellite markers for A. lehmannianus that can serve as a useful resource for estimation of genetic diversity. These newly developed primers can be used for conservation and restoration strategies of this rare species.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M.Y.W., D.Y.T., and X.J.S. conceived and designed the experiments. M.Y.W. performed the experiments. M.Y.W. and X.J.S. analyzed the data. M.Y.W., D.Y.T., and X.J.S. contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Speciesa Collection localityb Locality codeGeographic coordinates n Voucher no.c
Astragalus lehmannianus 1,2 BungeJimsar CountyG44°23′53″N, 88°47′13″E28XM201720
 Fukang CityC44°22′19″N, 88°08′28″E32XM201739
 Jimsar CountyJ44°25′27″N, 88°56′43″E5XM201686
A. arpilobus 3 Kar. & Kir.Fukang CityFK44°22′45″N, 88°10′02″E10QJ201811
A. oxyglottis 3 Steven ex M. Bieb.Jimsar CountyJM44°23′25″N, 88°47′33″E10MY201849

n = number of individuals sampled.

Samples were used as follows: 1 = individuals used for pre‐screening analyses and genotyping tests; 2 = individuals used for characterization of microsatellites; 3 = individuals used for cross‐amplification tests.

All samples were collected from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in China.

Vouchers deposited at Xinjiang Agricultural University (XJA), Xinjiang, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size (bp)GenBank accession no.
NS‐AL‐08 F: GACGTATTTGTCCCCCAAAA (AG)15 280 MN159044
R: CACTTTTTCTTTTCCTCTTTCTCAA
NS‐AL‐47 F: GTCAAAAGCATCGAGTTTCCA (AG)10 115 MN159045
R: ATTCGGATGAGATTTCCGTG
NS‐AL‐49 F: TTCCAACATGCTCATAACTTC (GA)10 116 MN159046
R: TCAACAACGCCATGGACA
NS‐AL‐62 F: CCTTTAACGTTGGAAACAA (GAT)18 149 MN159047
R: ACAGATGCTGAAGACGTCTCA
NS‐AL‐70 F: ATGAAGGGCGTGTTTGTTTC (TC)10 272 MN159048
R: CGGGGTCATAGGACTCTCTG
NS‐AL‐85 F: GGAATTCCTCGTGCATCTGT (GT)10 270 MN159049
R: CAAATTCCCATTCCATCACA
NS‐AL‐97 F: ATTTTTATCCCGCACCCTTC (CT)10 268 MN159050
R: TGTCATCTTCACCCCATGAA
NS‐AL‐98 F: CATTTCCTCTCTCTCCGGC (CT)10 268 MN159051
R: AGCCCAGTTCGTTTTCTGTG
NS‐AL‐121 F: TCTCATCACTCTCTGCCCCT (GA)10 278 MN159052
R: TGGATTTCATATTCTACAACCTTTTG
NS‐AL‐129 F: GTACCGAATCCAACTCCGAA (GA)13 277 MN159053
R: TCGTTCTGCTTCCTTCGTTT
NS‐AL‐137 F: TGATCTTCCAGCATGTTCTCA (GA)11 276 MN159054
R: CGTTTGCGAAAACAGATACG
NS‐AL‐142 F: GTTTCCATGTGTGTGTGCG (AG)15 275 MN159055
R: CCCAAAATAACGAAGCCAAA
NS‐AL‐143 F: ACTGGAATTCCCCTTCCAAC (GT)10 275 MN159056
R: TGAGGAAGAAGAGGGTCGTG
  6 in total

1.  An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments.

Authors:  M Schuelke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  [Composition and structure of a galactomannan macromolecules from seeds of Astragalus lehmannianus Bunge].

Authors:  N M Mestechkina; O V Anulov; N I Smirnova; V D Shcherbukhin
Journal:  Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

4.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Development and characterization of microsatellite primers in the federally endangered Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae).

Authors:  Ashley B Morris; Cassandra Scalf; Austin Burleyson; La Tonya Johnson; Kevin Trostel
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Effects of predispersal insect seed predation on the early life history stages of a rare cold sand-desert legume.

Authors:  Yi J Han; Jerry M Baskin; Dun Y Tan; Carol C Baskin; Ming Y Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.