Literature DB >> 31666771

Assessing the Impact of Removing Select Materials from Coal Mine Overburden, Central Appalachia Region, USA.

Patricio X Pinto1, Souhail R Al-Abed2, Christopher D Holder1,3, Richard Warner4, John McKernan2, Stephanie Fulton5, Eric Somerville6.   

Abstract

The exposure of readily soluble components of overburden materials from surface coal mining to air and water results in mineral oxidation and carbonate mineral dissolution, thus increasing coal mine water conductivity. A conductivity benchmark of 300 μS/cm for mine water discharges in the Appalachian region has been suggested to protect aquatic life and the environment. A USGS screening-level leach test was applied to individual strata from three cores collected from a surface mine site in the Central Appalachian region to generate preliminary conductivity rankings, which were used to classify strata for two disposal scenarios: (i) Unmodified Scenario, which included all extracted strata and (ii) Modified Scenario, which excluded 15% (by mass) of the overburden materials with the highest conductivities. We evaluated overburden leaching conductivity using EPA Method 1627 in 18 dry-wet cycles, generating conductivities of 1,020-1,150 μS/cm for the Unmodified Scenario and 624-979 μS/cm for the Modified Scenario. Hence, overburden segregation was successful in reducing the leachate conductivity, but did not reach the proposed benchmark. The leachate was dominated by sulfate in the first four cycles and by bicarbonates in cycles 5-18 in columns with higher sulfur content, while bicarbonates were dominant throughout experiments with lower sulfur content in overburden. The use of conductivity rankings, isolation of potentially problematic overburden strata, and appropriate materials management could reduce conductivity in Central Appalachian streams and other surface mining areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coal mine water; conductivity; materials management; mine waste leaching; total dissolved solids

Year:  2018        PMID: 31666771      PMCID: PMC6820139     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mine Water Environ        ISSN: 1025-9112            Impact factor:   2.883


  8 in total

1.  Acid-base accounting to predict post-mining drainage quality on surface mines.

Authors:  J Skousen; J Simmons; L M McDonald; P Ziemkiewicz
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed.

Authors:  T Ty Lindberg; Emily S Bernhardt; Raven Bier; A M Helton; R Brittany Merola; Avner Vengosh; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The effects of mountaintop mines and valley fills on the physicochemical quality of stream ecosystems in the central Appalachians: a review.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Susan B Norton; Laurie C Alexander; Amina I Pollard; Stephen D LeDuc
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional degradation of Central Appalachian rivers by surface coal mining.

Authors:  Emily S Bernhardt; Brian D Lutz; Ryan S King; John P Fay; Catherine E Carter; Ashley M Helton; David Campagna; John Amos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Evaluation of ionic contribution to the toxicity of a coal-mine effluent using Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Authors:  A J Kennedy; D S Cherry; C E Zipper
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Science and regulation. Mountaintop mining consequences.

Authors:  M A Palmer; E S Bernhardt; W H Schlesinger; K N Eshleman; E Foufoula-Georgiou; M S Hendryx; A D Lemly; G E Likens; O L Loucks; M E Power; P S White; P R Wilcock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A column evaluation of Appalachian coal mine spoils' temporal leaching behavior.

Authors:  Zenah W Orndorff; W Lee Daniels; Carl E Zipper; Matt Eick; Mike Beck
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  A method for assessing the potential for confounding applied to ionic strength in central Appalachian streams.

Authors:  Glenn W Suter; Susan M Cormier
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.