| Literature DB >> 31666590 |
Carmen Roncal1,2,3, Esther Martínez-Aguilar3,4, Josune Orbe1,2,3, Susana Ravassa2,3,5, Alejandro Fernandez-Montero3,6, Goren Saenz-Pipaon1,3, Ana Ugarte7, Ander Estella-Hermoso de Mendoza7, Jose A Rodriguez1,2,3, Sebastián Fernández-Alonso3,4, Leopoldo Fernández-Alonso3,4, Julen Oyarzabal7, Jose A Paramo8,9,10,11.
Abstract
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major cause of acute and chronic illness, with extremely poor prognosis that remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO), a gut derived metabolite, has been associated with atherosclerotic burden. We determined plasma levels of TMAO by mass spectrometry and evaluated their association with PAD severity and prognosis. 262 symptomatic PAD patients (mean age 70 years, 87% men) categorized in intermittent claudication (IC, n = 147) and critical limb ischemia (CLI, n = 115) were followed-up for a mean average of 4 years (min 1-max 102 months). TMAO levels were increased in CLI compared to IC (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for severity (CLI) rendered a cutoff of 2.26 µmol/L for TMAO (62% sensitivity, 76% specificity). Patients with TMAO > 2.26 µmol/L exhibited higher risk of cardiovascular death (sub-hazard ratios ≥2, P < 0.05) that remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors. TMAO levels were associated to disease severity and CV-mortality in our cohort, suggesting an improvement of PAD prognosis with the measurement of TMAO. Overall, our results indicate that the intestinal bacterial function, together with the activity of key hepatic enzymes for TMA oxidation (FMO3) and renal function, should be considered when designing therapeutic strategies to control gut-derived metabolites in vascular patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31666590 PMCID: PMC6821861 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52082-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical parameters in PAD patients (n = 262).
| PAD (n = 262) | IC n = 147 | CLI n = 115 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Sex (male, %) | 87 | 88 | 85 | 0.442 |
| Age (years) | 70 (11) | 68 (10) | 73 (11) | <0.001 |
| Smokers (%) | ||||
| Never | 20 | 12 | 29 | 0.004 |
| Current | 32 | 35 | 29 | |
| Former | 48 | 53 | 42 | |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 53 | 36 | 74 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 74 | 72 | 77 | 0.331 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 62 | 67 | 57 | 0.093 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28 (5) | 28 (5) | 28 (6) | 0.830 |
| ABI | 0.55 (0.19) | 0.62 (0.17) | 0.38 (0.13) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| COPD | 14 | 14 | 13 | 0.772 |
| CKD | 39 | 24 | 58 | <0.001 |
| AMI | 28 | 26 | 30 | 0.486 |
| Cardiomyopathy | 25 | 14 | 38 | <0.001 |
| Cerebral ischemia | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0.009 |
|
| ||||
| Anticoagulants | 13 | 8 | 20 | 0.005 |
| Antiplatelets | 77 | 82 | 70 | 0.033 |
| ACE inhibitors | 34 | 32 | 36 | 0.440 |
| ARA-2 | 27 | 23 | 32 | 0.102 |
| Calcium antagonists | 22 | 18 | 27 | 0.071 |
| Vasodilators | 7 | 6 | 8 | 0.589 |
| β-Blockers | 24 | 24 | 23 | 0.722 |
| Statins | 65 | 69 | 59 | 0.084 |
|
| ||||
| Total col (mg/mL) | 172 (46) | 187 (41) | 153 (47) | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 110 (91) | 114 (83) | 104 (99) | 0.360 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 43 (16) | 49 (15) | 36 (13) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 145 (81) | 151 (88) | 138 (70) | 0.194 |
| hs-CRPa (mg/mL) | 5 (11) | 3 (4) | 10 (22) | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 21 (9) | 21 (9) | 20 (8) | 0.194 |
| ALT (U/L) | 21 (14) | 22 (14) | 19 (13) | 0.081 |
| GGT (U/L) | 54 (69) | 50 (61) | 60 (78) | 0.244 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 73 (21) | 79 (19) | 66 (22) | <0.001 |
Mean (SD) is shown. aLog-transformed variables are presented as median (interquartile range). BMI: body mass index, ABI: ankle-brachial index, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CKD: chronic kidney disease, AMI: acute myocardial infarction, ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARA-2: angiotensin II receptor antagonist, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein. ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyltransferase; GFR: Glomerular filtration rate.
Logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR, 95% confidence interval) for TMAO in PAD patients (n = 262). Dependent variable IC/CLI.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | ≤2.26 | >2.26 | p | ||
|
| 1.84 (1.49–2.27) | <0.001 | 1 | 4.97 (2.92–8.47) | <0.001 |
|
| 1.68 (1.3–2.2) | <0.001 | 1 | 4.4 (2.1–9.1) | <0.001 |
aLog-transformed variable. Unadjusted Model 1. Model 2: sex, age, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, HDL-C, eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and hs-CRP (log-transformed).
Association of TMAO (µmol/L) with CV death.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR | 95% CI | p | SHR | 95% CI | p | |
| CV death | ||||||
| Model 1 | 1.52 | 1.27–1.83 | <0.001 | 3.44 | 1.74–6.79 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.39 | 1.13–1.70 | 0.001 | 2.55 | 1.22–5.28 | 0.012 |
| Model 3 | 1.29 | 1.05–1.60 | 0.015 | 2.15 | 1.04–4.48 | 0.040 |
| Model 4 | 1.52 | 1.27–1.82 | <0.001 | 3.36 | 1.68–6.70 | 0.001 |
aLog-transformed variable. Sub-hazard ratios (SHR) are effects sizes for a doubling of TMAO in plasma. Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: sex, age and hs-CRP (log). Model 3: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Model 4: smoking, dyslipidemia, HDL-C.
Figure 1TMAO levels are associated to CV-mortality in PAD. Unadjusted cumulative incidence curve for the risk of CV mortality after a competing risk analysis (Fine-Gray model), where the competing event was non-CV death, in all patients categorized according to the TMAO cutoff (>2.26 µmol/L).
Added predictive value of TMAO > 2.26 µmol/L for CV death in PAD patients.
| Value | 95% CIa | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 2 | |||
| Harrell’s C | |||
| Basal model | 0.787 | 0.713 to 0.862 | |
| Basal model + biomarker | 0.805 | 0.737 to 0.873 | 0.40 |
| IDI | 0.034 | −0.002 to 0.104 | 0.19 |
| NRI | 0.700 | 0.169 to 0.949 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | |||
| Harrell’s C | |||
| Basal model | 0.738 | 0.652 to 0.823 | |
| Basal model + biomarker | 0.760 | 0.681 to 0.840 | 0.31 |
| IDI | 0.018 | −0.006 to 0.074 | 0.38 |
| NRI | 0.667 | 0.094 to 0.967 | 0.003 |
| Model 4 | |||
| Harrell’s C | |||
| Basal model | 0.629 | 0.492 to 0.767 | |
| Basal model + biomarker | 0.683 | 0.564 to 0.802 | 0.16 |
| IDI | 0.035 | 0.001 to 0.102 | 0.17 |
| NRI | 0.712 | 0.362 to 0.953 | <0.001 |
Model 2: sex, age and hs-CRP (log-transformed). Model 3: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Model 4: smoking, dyslipidemia, HDL-C. IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, net reclassification improvement. aThe variance was calculated using bootstrapping (with 1000 resamples) for the IDI and NRI estimates and the jackknife approach for the Harrell’s C estimates.