| Literature DB >> 31665781 |
Ligia María Cruz Espinoza1, Ellen McCreedy2, Marianne Holm1, Justin Im1, Ondari D Mogeni1, Prerana Parajulee1, Ursula Panzner1, Se Eun Park1,3, Trevor Toy1, Andrea Haselbeck1, Hye Jin Seo1, Hyon Jin Jeon1,4, Jong-Hoon Kim1, Soo Young Kwon1, Jerome H Kim1, Christopher M Parry5, Florian Marks1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complications from typhoid fever disease have been estimated to occur in 10%-15% of hospitalized patients, with evidence of a higher risk in children and when delaying the implementation of effective antimicrobial treatment. We estimated the prevalence of complications in hospitalized patients with culture-confirmed typhoid fever and the effects of delaying the implementation of effective antimicrobial treatment and age on the prevalence and risk of complications.Entities:
Keywords: complications; meta-analysis; prevalence; risk factors; typhoid fever
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31665781 PMCID: PMC6821330 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Search Terms, Search Limits, and Selection Criteria for Study Inclusion From the PubMed Database Review
| Search Terms |
| • ((typhoid fever) OR (enteric fever) OR ( |
| Search Limits |
| • Published in English in peer-reviewed journal from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2018
|
| Selection Criteria |
| • Typhoid fever cases identified from prospective/retrospective, cross-sectional, or surveillance studies
|
Figure 1.Study selection flow diagram (1990–2018).
Risk of Bias Assessment of Articles Selected for the Qualitative Analyses From the Systematic Literature Review (1990–2018)
| RoB Assessment Criteria (All That Apply) | Study, First Author [Reference] | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parry [ | Malik [ | Limpitikul [ | Kadhiravan [ | Abucejo [ | Kabra [ | Rajajee [ | Khosla [ | Walia [ | Song [ | Feasey [ | Wongsawat [ | Van den bergh [ | Khan [ | Rao [ | Rasaily [ | Ollé-Goig [ | Seçmmer [ | Sharma [ | Mishra [ | Mukherjee [ | |
| Selectiona | L | L | M | M | M | M | M | M | H | M | M | H | L | L | M | H | L | M | H | M | M |
| Selection/recruitment of TF culture-confirmed cases | |||||||||||||||||||||
| From overall hospital visits/lab records (L) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
| From patients with suspected typhoid fever /other criteria (M) | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selection/ recruitment not described (H) | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Exclusion of typhoid fever culture-confirmed cases | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Exclusion criteria reported (L) | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
| Exclusion criteria not reported (M) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Based on AMR, pretreatment, or incomplete medical file (H) | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||
| Identification and measurment of complicationsa | L | L | L | L | M | L | M | M | L | L | L | L | L | L | M | H | M | M | M | M | H |
| Definition of reported complications | |||||||||||||||||||||
| All/some complications defined (L) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| No complications defined (M) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Complications measured from | |||||||||||||||||||||
| All selected typhoid fever cases included for analysis (L) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xb | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Subset of selected typhoid fever cases included for analysis (H) | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| Reportinga | L | L | L | L | M | L | M | M | L | M | M | M | M | M | H | L | H | H | H | M | H |
| Complications reported | |||||||||||||||||||||
| All observed complications counted and reported (L) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
| All observed complications counted but not all reported (M) | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| Some complications counted and reported (H) | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
| Key risk factors/information to interpret result | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AMR analysis and days of disease before admission/recruitment reported (L) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| AMR analysis not reported (M) | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||
| Days of disease before admission/recruitment not reported (M) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Overall RoBa | L | L | M | M | M | M | M | M | H | M | M | H | M | M | H | H | H | H | H | M | H |
Abbreviations: AMR, antimicrobial resistance; H, high; L, low; M, medium; RoB, risk of bias.
aFor each subgroup (Selection, Detection, Reporting) and for the overall RoB assessment, RoB was decided based on the following criteria: All criteria evaluated with a “low” RoB, then RoB for that section is “low”; 1 criterion evaluated with a “medium” RoB, then RoB for that section is “medium”; 1 criteria evaluated with a “high” RoB, then RoB for that section is “high.” The results from each subgroup assessment were used for the overall RoB.
bComplications are not reported for 31% (39/127) of culture-confirmed typhoid fever cases identified during the study. However, the cases from which complications were reported were randomly selected (88/127) and for this reason, considered not biased and included in the meta-analysis.
Prevalence of Complications and Risk Factor Data From Hospitalized Typhoid Fever Cases by Study (1990–2018)
| Typhoid Fever Cases | Antimicrobial Susceptibility, No. (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Complication | Mortality | ||||||||||
| First Author, Year of Publication, Country [Reference] | Study Years | Age Group | Days of Disease at Admission | No. | No. (%) | No. (%) | Antimicrobial Testeda | AMR | MDR | NARS | FRS | Risk of Bias/Main Reason |
| Song, 2017, China [ | 2005–2014 | All ages | NR | 88 | 46/88 (52.3%) | 0 | Ampi, Chlor, Tetra, Nac, Genta, Cotri, Cefo, Cipro | 47/88 (53.4%) | 0 | 47/88 (53.4%) | 46/88 (52%) | M/From patients with suspected typhoid fever/other criteria. Exclusion criteria NR; days ill prior to admission NR |
| Parry, 2014, Vietnam [ | 1993–1999 | All ages | 8 (6–11)b | 581 | 90/581 (15.5%) | 3/581 (0.5%) | Ampi, Cotri, Cipro, Ceft, Chlor, Oflox, Azit, Nac | 506/581 (87.1%) | 469/581 (80.7%) | NR | 215/581 (37%) | L |
| Malik, 2002, Malaysia [ | 1993–1998 | <14 y | 11.6 (4–35)c | 102 | 33/102 (32.4%) | 0 | Ampi, Cotri, Chlor | 0 | 0 | NT | NT | L |
| Limpitikul, 2014, Thailand [ | 2009–2011 | <15 y | 5 (4–7)b | 368 | 49/368 (13.3%) | 0 | Amox, Ampi, Cotri, Cipro, Cefo, Ceft | 0 | 0 | NT | 0 | M/Exclusion criteria NR |
| Kadhiravan, 2005, India [ | 2001–2003 | All ages | 8 (4.8–14)b | 60 | 11/60 (18.3%) | 0 | Amox, Cotri, Ceft, Cipro, Chlo, Nac | 47/60 (78.3%) | 22/60 (36.6%) | 47/60 (78%) | 0 | M/Exclusion criteria NR |
| Abucejo, 2001, Philippines [ | 1994–1997 | All ages | 57% >1 wk | 422 | 77/422 (18.2) | 9/422 (2%) | Ampi, Cotri, Ceft, Chlor, Cipro, Oflox | 0 | 0 | NT | 0 | M/Exclusion criteria NR; No. of typhoid fever cases with complications registered but not all complications reported; no complications defined |
| Kabra, 2000, India [ | NR | Childrend | 62% >1 wk | 100 | 40/100 (40%) | 0 | Amox, Ampi, Cotri, Cipro, Cefo, Ceft, Chlor, Ceph, Genta, Fura | 80/100 (80%) | 80/100 (80%) | NT | 0 | M/Exclusion criteria NR |
| Rajajee, 1995, India [ | 1991–1992 | <3 y | NR | 71 | 33/71 (46%) | 2/71 (2.8%) | Ampi, Amik, Chlor, Cotri, Ceftr, Cipro, Kana, Genta, Netro, Cefta, Cepha, Carb, Cefu, Cefo | 43/71 (60.5%) | 36/71 (51%) | NT | 0 | M/Exclusion criteria NR; no complications defined; days ill prior to admission not reported |
| Khosla, 1998, India [ | 1991–1992 | ≥15 y | NR | 180 | 51/180 (28.3) | 12/180 (6.7%) | Ampi, Amox, Cotri, Chlor, Cipro, Genta, Tetra | 124/180 (68.6%) | 18/180 (10%) | NT | 5/180 (3%) | M/Exclusion criteria NR; no complications defined; days ill prior to admission NR |
| Walia, 2005, India [ | 2001–2003 | All ages | 77.2% >1wk | 88 | 41/88 (46.6%) | 4/88 (4.5%) | Ampi, Cotri, Chlor, Ceft, Cefi, Cipro, Nac | NR | 26/88 (29.5%) | 63/88 (71.5%) | NR | H/typhoid fever cases who had previously received quinolones or cephalosporin or macrolides or chloramphenicol were excluded |
| Feasey, 2015, Malawi [ | 2011–2013 | All ages | NR | 325 | 58/325 (17.8%) | 7/325 (2%) | Ampi, Chlor, Cotri, Cefp, Cipro | NR | NR | NT | NR | M/ Exclusion criteria NR; days ill prior to admission and antimicrobial resistance analyses NR |
| Wongsawat, 2002, Thailand [ | 1986– 2000 | <16 y | NR | 14 | 6/14 (42.9%) | 0 | Ampi, Cotri, Chlor, Cefo, Ceft, Cipro, Imip | 2/14 (14.2) | 0 | NT | 0 | H/26% of typhoid fever cases excluded for incomplete medical records |
| van den Bergh, 1999, Indonesia [ | 1989–1990 | ≥14 y | NR | 105 | 14/105 (13.3%) | 5/105 (5%) | NR | … | … | … | … | M/Days ill prior to admission and antimicrobial resistance analysis NR |
| Khan, 1999, South Africa [ | 1993–1995 | All ages | NAe | 102 | 39/102 (38%) | 1/102 (1%) | NR | … | … | … | … | M/Antimicrobial resistance analysis NR |
| Seçmeer, 1995, Turkey [ | 1982–1992 | <14 y | NR | 27 | NAf | 4/27 (14.8%) | Ampi, Ceft, Cefo, Chlor, Cotri | 3/27 (11.1%) | NR | NT | NT | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications NR; only selected complications included in the article |
| Rasaily, 1994, India [ | 1990–1992 | <12 y | 16.4 (10)g | 172 | 11/172 (6.4%) | 3/172 (1.7%) | Ampi, Amik, Chlor, Cipro, Fura, Genta, Nac, Norf, Tetra, Cotri | 172/172 (100%) | 172/172 (100%) | 4/172 (2.5%) | 0 | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications at recruitment and/or infected with strains fully sensitive to antimicrobials were excluded |
| Ollé-Goig, 1993, Haiti [ | 1988–1991 | ≥14 y | 95% <15 d | 217 | NAf | 20/129 (9.25%) | NR | … | … | … | … | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications NR; only selected complications included in the article |
| Rao, 1993, India [ | 1990–1991 | NR | NR | 102 | NAf | 1/102 (1%) | Ampi, Chlor, Tetra, Genta, Kana, Amox, Cotri, Cipro, Norf | 80/102 (78.4%) | 80/102 (78.4%) | NT | 0 | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications NR; only selected complications included in the article |
| Sharma, 1993, India [ | NR | <15 y | NAe | 65 | NAf | 2/65 (3.1%) | Ampi, Chlor, Cotri, Genta, Norf | 42/65 (64.6%) | 42/65 (64.6%) | NT | 0 | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications NR; only selected complications included in the article |
| Mishra, 1991, India [ | 1990 | Children | NR | 50 | 14/50 (28.2%) | 1/50 (2%) | NR | … | 39/50 (78%) | … | … | M/Exclusion criteria NR; complications not defined; days ill prior to admission not reported |
| Mukherjee, 1991, India [ | 1989–1990 | All ages | 76% >1wk | 46 | NAf | 6/46 (13%) | Ampi, Chlor, Clox, Cotri, Cipro, Norf, Genta, Fura | 32/46 (69.5%) | 31/46 (67.3%) | NT | 0 | H/Typhoid Fever cases with complications NR; only selected complications included in the article |
Abbreviations: AMR, Salmonella Typhi isolates resistant to at least 1 of the antimicrobials tested; FRS, isolates with reduced susceptibility or resistant to fluoroquinolones; H, high; L, low; M, medium; MDR, multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhi isolates; NARS, nalidixic acid–resistant Salmonella Typhi; NA, not available; NR, not reported; NT, not tested.
aAzit (azithromycin), Amox (amoxicillin), Ampi (ampicillin), Amik (amikacin), Cotri (cotrimoxazole), Ceph (cephalexin), Cipro (ciprofloxacin), Cefo (cefotaxime), Ceft (ceftriaxone), Cefta (ceftazidime), Cefi (cefixime), Cefp (cefpodoxime), Chlor (chloramphenicol), Cepha (cephaloridine), Carb (carbenicillin), Cefu (cefuroxime), Cefo (cefotaxime), Clox (cloxacillin), Fura (furazolidone), Genta (gentamicin), Imip (imipenem), Kana (kanamicin), Nac (Nalidixic acid), Netro (netromycin), Norf (norfloxacin), Oflox (Ofloxacin), Tetra (tetracycline).
bMedian (interquartile range).
cMean (range).
dUpper age limit for children not described.
eDays of illness at admission reported stratified by a second variable (sex/MDR); it cannot be used to compare with days of illness at admission from others articles that report nonstratified days of illness.
fComplications are listed, but the publication does not specify the number of patients reporting these complications.
gMean (standard deviation).
Figure 2.Forest plots showing the overall and subgroup prevalence of typhoid fever complications among hospitalized patients (1990–2018), by illness duration at hospitalization (A) and age (B). Abbreviations: A adults; All, all ages; C, children; CI, confidence interval; Comp, complications; DDA, mean/median illness duration (days) at hospitalization; ES, estimated prevalence; ID, study ID, study identification-first author (year of publication); MDR, multidrug antimicrobial resistance reported in each study; NR, not reported.
Frequency and Prevalence of Specific Typhoid Fever Complications Reported From Articles Included in the Meta-analysis (1990–2018)
| Complication | Frequency, No. | Total Group of Typhoid Fever Cases From Which Complications Are Reported, No. | Prevalenceb, % (95% CI) | Study Reporting the Complication, First Author [Reference] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aminotransferase elevation | 28 | 88 | 32 (22–42) | Song [ |
| Acute kidney injury | 2 | 470 | 0.3 (–.2 to .8) | Malik [ |
| Anemia | 41 | 693 | 5.8 (4–7.8) | Limpitikul [ |
| Ascites | 7 | 368 | 1.9 (.5–3.3) | Limpitikul [ |
| Blood transfusion | 3 | 581 | 0.5 (–.1 to 1.1) | Parry [ |
| Bone marrow suppression | 8 | 102 | 7.8 (2.6–13.1) | Malik [ |
| Bleeding or perforation | 3 | 105 | 2.9 (–.3 to 6) | van den Bergh [ |
| Confusion | 5 | 325 | 1.5 (.2–2.9) | Feasey [ |
| Changes in sensorium | 3 | 60 | 5.0 (–.5 to 10.5) | Kadhiravan [ |
| Cholecystitis | 18 | 854 | 3.2 (.2–6.1) | Malik [ |
| Cyanotic episodes | 3 | 71 | 4.2 (–.5 to 8.9) | Rajajee [ |
| Decreased consciousness level | 13 | 325 | 4.0 (1.9–6.1) | Feasey [ |
| Encephalopathy | 47 | 879 | 7.3 (2.8–11.9) | Kabra [ |
| Gastrointestinal bleeding | 75 | 1251 | 5.7 (2.4–9.0) | Kabra [ |
| Hemorrhage | 4 | 180 | 2.2 (.1–4.4) | Khosla [ |
| Hemolysis | 1 | 102 | 1.0 (–.9 to 2.9) | Malik [ |
| Hemodynamic shock | 5 | 581 | 0.9 (.1–1.6) | Parry [ |
| Hemolytic anemia | 3 | 368 | 0.8 (–.1 to 1.7) | Limpitikul [ |
| Hepatitis | 71 | 1500 | 4.9 (2.3–7.5) | Malik [ |
| Hypothermia | 10 | 71 | 14.1 (6.0–22.2) | Rajajee [ |
| Ileitis | 21 | 422 | 5.0 (2.9–7.1) | Abucejo [ |
| Intestinal perforation | 32 | 2268 | 1.1 (.4–1.8) | Malik [ |
| Lower respiratory symptoms | 7 | 368 | 1.9 (.5–3.3) | Limpitikul [ |
| Liver abscess | 1 | 71 | 1.4 (–1.3 to 4.1) | Rajajee [ |
| Marrow hypoplasia | 6 | 71 | 8.5 (2.0–14.9) | Rajajee [ |
| Meningitis | 4 | 131 | 2.5 (–.2 to 5.2) | Rajajee [ |
| Myocarditis | 41 | 1491 | 2.8 (1.5–4.0) | Malik [ |
| Neuropsychiatric complications | 24 | 180 | 13.3 (8.4–18.3) | Khosla [ |
| Nephritis/glomerulonephritis | 16 | 273 | 4.8 (.1–9.4) | Kabra [ |
| Osteomyelitis | 2 | 102 | 2.0 (–.7 to 4.7) | Malik [ |
| Paralytic ileus | 12 | 282 | 4.2 (.4–8.1) | Malik [ |
| Peripheral circulatory failure | 2 | 180 | 1.1 (–.4 to 2.6) | Khosla [ |
| Peritonitis | 2 | 88 | 2.3 (–.8 to 5.4) | Song [ |
| Pleural effusion | 7 | 631 | 1.1 (.3–1.9) | Parry [ |
| Pneumonia/bronchopneumonia | 32 | 1234 | 2.5 (.7–4.2) | Malik [ |
| Psychosis | 20 | 524 | 3.8 (2.2–5.5) | Malik [ |
| Renal impairment | 4 | 581 | 0.7 (.0–1.4) | Parry [ |
| SIADH | 2 | 102 | 2.0 (–.7 to 4.7) | Malik [ |
| Seizure | 1 | 368 | 0.3 (–.3 to .8) | Limpitikul [ |
| Sepsis syndrome | 10 | 105 | 9.5 (3.9–15.1) | van den Bergh [ |
| Severe anemia | 6 | 581 | 1.0 (.2–1.9) | Parry [ |
| Stupor or coma | 3 | 105 | 2.9 (–.3 to 6.0) | van den Bergh [ |
| Transient thrombocytopenia | 4 | 100 | 4.0 (.2–7.8) | Kabra [ |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.
aIncludes data from publications that measured the specific complication.
bPrevalence estimated using a random-effects model.
Figure 3.Frequency (pooled across the studies reporting the complications and illness duration at hospitalization) of typhoid fever complications (1990–2018). Abbreviation: DDA, mean/median illness duration at hospitalization.
Risk Analyses of Typhoid Fever Complications Among Hospitalized Patients Reporting Illness Duration at Hospitalization (1990–2018)
| DDA ≥10 | DDA <10 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complication | Frequency, No. | Typhoid fever Cases, No. | Prevalenceb, % | [Reference] | Frequency, No. | Typhoid fever Cases, No. | Prevalenceb, % | [Reference] | OR (95% CI) |
|
| Acute kidney injury | 1 | 102 | 1.0 | [ | 1 | 368 | 0.3 | [ | 3.63 (.04–285.97) | .330 |
| Cholecystitis | 7 | 202 | 3.4 | [ | 4 | 581 | 0.7 | [ | 5.17 (1.29–24.32) | .003 |
| Encephalopathy | 18 | 100 | 18.0 | [ | 20 | 641 | 3.4 | [ | 6.81 (3.24–14.13) | .000 |
| GI bleeding | 14 | 100 | 14.0 | [ | 55 | 1063 | 4.0 | [ | 2.98 (1.46–5.70) | .000 |
| Hepatitis | 23 | 202 | 10.9 | [ | 33 | 641 | 5.1 | [ | 2.36 (1.29–4.27) | .001 |
| Intestinal perforation | 3 | 202 | 1.5 | [ | 8 | 1371 | 0.4 | [ | 2.56 (.43–10.80) | .151 |
| Myocarditis | 4 | 102 | 3.9 | [ | 13 | 641 | 2.0 | [ | 1.97 (.45–6.54) | .234 |
| Pneumonia | 1 | 102 | 1.0 | [ | 5 | 581 | 0.9 | [ | 1.14 (.02–10.34) | .904 |
| Psychosis | 4 | 102 | 3.9 | [ | 16 | 422 | 3.8 | [ | 1.03 (.24–3.30) | .950 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DDA, mean/median illness duration at hospitalization; GI, gastrointestinal; OR, odds ratio.
aIncludes data from publications that measured the specific complication.
bPrevalence estimated using a random-effects model.