Literature DB >> 31665567

A multicenter prospective registration study on laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Japan: report on the assessment of 1,429 patients.

Takao Ohtsuka1, Yuichi Nagakawa2, Hirochika Toyama3, Yutaka Takeda4, Atsuyuki Maeda5, Yusuke Kumamoto6, Yoshiharu Nakamura7, Kazuki Hashida8, Goro Honda9, Kengo Fukuzawa10, Eiji Toyoda11, Minoru Tanabe12, Naoto Gotohda13, Ippei Matsumoto14, Tomoki Ryu15, Ichiro Uyama16, Toru Kojima17, Michiaki Unno18, Daisuke Ichikawa19, Yosuke Inoue20, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa21, Takeshi Sudo22, Kyoichi Takaori23, Hiroki Yamaue24, Susumu Eguchi25, Munenori Tahara26, Makoto Shinzeki27, Hidetoshi Eguchi28, Masanao Kurata29, Mamoru Morimoto30, Hiromitsu Hayashi31, Shigeru Marubashi32, Masafumi Inomata33, Kenjiro Kimura34, Koji Amaya35, Masayuki Sho36, Ryuichi Yoshida37, Akihiro Murata38, Hideyuki Yoshitomi39, Kenichi Hakamada40, Masafumi Yasunaga41, Nobutsugu Abe42, Masayoshi Hioki43, Masaru Tsuchiya44, Takeyuki Misawa45, Yasuji Seyama46, Hirokazu Noshiro47, Eiji Sakamoto48, Kiyoshi Hasegawa49, Yasunari Kawabata50, Yoichiro Uchida51, Shinichiro Kameyama52, Saiho Ko53, Takashi Takao54, Kenji Kitahara55, Shin Nakahira56, Hideo Baba57, Masahiko Watanabe58,59, Masakazu Yamamoto60,61, Masafumi Nakamura1,62.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies are needed to understand the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. The aim of the present study was to describe laparoscopic pancreatectomy currently undertaken in Japan, using a prospective registration system.
METHODS: Patient characteristics and planned operations were registered preoperatively, and then the performed operation and outcomes were reported using an online system. Collected data were also compared between institutions based on their level of experience. This study was registered with UMIN000022836.
RESULTS: Available data were obtained from 1,429 patients at 100 Japanese institutions, including 1,197 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDPs) and 232 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies (LPDs). The rates of completion for planned operations were 92% for LDP and 91% for LPD. Postoperative complication rates after LDP and LPD were 17% and 30%, and 90-day mortality rates were 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower incidence of pancreatic fistula were observed in institutions experienced in LDP. A higher rate of pure laparoscopic procedure and shorter operation time were noted in institutions experienced with LPD.
CONCLUSION: LDPs and LPDs are performed safely in Japan, especially in experienced institutions. Our data could support the next challenges in the field of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.
© 2019 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopic pancreatectomy; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Prospective registration

Year:  2019        PMID: 31665567     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  5 in total

1.  Conversion to open laparotomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: lessons from a single-center experience in 70 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ippei Matsumoto; Keiko Kamei; Shumpei Satoi; Takaaki Murase; Masataka Matsumoto; Kohei Kawaguchi; Yuta Yoshida; Dongha Lee; Atsushi Takebe; Takuya Nakai; Yoshifumi Takeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Surgical Outcomes Following Early Drain Removal After Distal Pancreatectomy in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakamoto; Yakuki Yagyu; E I Uchinaka; Takehiko Hanaki; Kozo Miyatani; Kyoichi Kihara; Manabu Yamamoto; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Naruo Tokuyasu; Soichiro Honjo; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Elie Chouillard; Mohamed Abu Hilal; Roland Croner; Brice Gayet; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Hybrid and Totally Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chengfang Wang; Ruizhao Qi; Huixing Li; Xianjie Shi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-26

5.  Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.

Authors:  Yabo Jiang; Kailian Zheng; Shichao Zhang; Zhuo Shao; Peng Cheng; Yijie Zhang; Gang Jin; Tianlin He
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.