Literature DB >> 31664581

Lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas without bone invasion-still skull base surgery?

Marco V Corniola1,2, Jean-Michel Lemée3, Karl Schaller3,4, Torstein R Meling3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Sphenoid wing meningiomas are generally considered as skull base meningiomas (SBMs). However, given their surgical similarities with non-skull base meningiomas (NSBMs), we hypothesized that lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas (LSWMs) without bone invasion (BI) should be considered as NSBMs. N = 65 LSWMs without BI operated between 1990 to 2010 at a single-center were compared to N = 352 NSBMs, represented by convexity meningiomas (CMs), and to N = 23 SBMs, represented by spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs), with respect to baseline demographics, clinical presentations, Simpson grades, complications, adjuvant therapies, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Only WHO grade I meningiomas were included. No significant differences in baseline demographics, clinical presentation, or pre-operative KPS were found between the three groups. Simpson grade 1-3 was achieved in 90.1% of LSWMs, 97.1% in CMs (p = 0.05), and 82.6% in SOMs (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences in postoperative infection, hematoma, neurological worsening, 30-day mortality, or OS between the three groups. Lower re-treatment rates were observed in LSWMs and CMs compared to SOMs (p = 0.06). With respect to PFS, there was no significant difference between LSWMs and CMs (89.1% and 88.5% at 5 years, respectively), whereas PFS was significantly higher in LSWMs than in SOMs (79% at 5 years) (p = 0.05). LSWMs without BI should be considered as an intermediate entity between NSBMs and SBMs. LSWMs are similar to SOMs with respect to extent of resection, but more similar to CMs with respect to re-treatment rates and PFS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overall survival; Progression free survival; Skull Base surgery; Sphenoid wing Meningiomas

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31664581     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01181-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  22 in total

Review 1.  The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application.

Authors:  K M Abdel Aziz; S C Froelich; P L Cohen; A Sanan; J T Keller; H R van Loveren
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  [Surgical treatment of the spheno-orbital tumors (author's transl)].

Authors:  A Basso; A Carrizo; A Kreutel; A Martino; J Cerisola; A Torrieri; L Amezua
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.553

3.  Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical series and design of an intraoperative management algorithm.

Authors:  Lior Gonen; Eytan Nov; Nir Shimony; Ben Shofty; Nevo Margalit
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: A 16-Year Surgical Experience.

Authors:  Jacob L Freeman; Monica S Davern; Soliman Oushy; Stefan Sillau; D Ryan Ormond; A Samy Youssef; Kevin O Lillehei
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Recurrence of Skull Base Meningiomas: The Role of Aggressive Removal in Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo da Silva; Paulo Eduardo Peixoto de Freitas
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-10-25

6.  Surgery for convexity meningioma: Simpson Grade I resection as the goal: clinical article.

Authors:  Bernt Filip Hasseleid; Torstein R Meling; Pål Rønning; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Surgical management of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas encasing major cerebral arteries.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Champagne; Emile Lemoine; Michel W Bojanowski
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Pathologic Predictors of Local Recurrence in Atypical Meningiomas Following Gross Total Resection.

Authors:  Olivia Claire Barrett; James R Hackney; Andrew M McDonald; Christopher D Willey; Markus Bredel; John B Fiveash
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Large and giant skull base meningiomas: The role of radical surgical removal.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo da Silva; Paulo Eduardo Peixoto de Freitas
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-06-29

Review 10.  EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas.

Authors:  Roland Goldbrunner; Giuseppe Minniti; Matthias Preusser; Michael D Jenkinson; Kita Sallabanda; Emmanuel Houdart; Andreas von Deimling; Pantelis Stavrinou; Florence Lefranc; Morten Lund-Johansen; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Dieta Brandsma; Roger Henriksson; Riccardo Soffietti; Michael Weller
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  2 in total

1.  Real-world treatment results for ruptured blood-blister aneurysm of the internal carotid artery: analysis of a Japanese nationwide multicenter study.

Authors:  Yusuke Egashira; Yukiko Enomoto; Noriyuki Nakayama; Miki Fujimura; Yuichiro Kikkawa; Masanori Aihara; Takatoshi Sorimachi; Takayuki Mizunari; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Management of Recurrent Meningiomas: State of the Art and Perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Vincenzo Corniola; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.