Literature DB >> 27175316

Recurrence of Skull Base Meningiomas: The Role of Aggressive Removal in Surgical Treatment.

Carlos Eduardo da Silva1, Paulo Eduardo Peixoto de Freitas1.   

Abstract

Objectives The recurrence of meningiomas is a crucial aspect that must be considered during the planning of treatment strategy. The Simpson grade classification is the most relevant surgical aspect to predict the recurrence of meningiomas. We report on a series of patients with recurrent skull base meningiomas who were treated with the goal of radical removal. Design A retrospective study. Setting Hospital Ernesto Dornelles, Porto Alegre, Brazil. ParticipantsPatients with recurrent skull base meningiomas. Main Outcomes Measures The goal of obtaining aggressive resection (i.e., Simpson grades I and II). Results The average age was 54 years, the mean follow-up period was 52.1 months, and Simpson grades I and II were obtained in 82%. The overall mortality was 5.8%. Transient cranial nerve deficits occurred in 11.7%; the definitive morbidity was also 5.8%. A second recurrence occurred in 5.8%. Conclusions Radical removal of recurrent skull base meningiomas is achievable and should be considered an option with a good outcome and an acceptable morbidity. The common surgical finding that was responsible for recurrence in this study was incomplete removal during the first surgery. We recommend extensive dura and bone removal in the surgical treatment of such recurrent lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simpson grade; brain tumor; meningioma; recurrence; skull base

Year:  2015        PMID: 27175316      PMCID: PMC4862840          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  29 in total

1.  Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical technique and outcome.

Authors:  Soichi Oya; Burak Sade; Joung H Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Molecular genetics of meningiomas.

Authors:  Brian T Ragel; Randy L Jensen
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Skull Base Meningiomas and Cranial Nerves Contrast Using Sodium Fluorescein: A New Application of an Old Tool.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo da Silva; Vinicius Duval da Silva; Jefferson Luis Braga da Silva
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-04-17

4.  Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions.

Authors:  O Al-Mefty
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO Grade I meningiomas.

Authors:  Soichi Oya; Kensuke Kawai; Hirofumi Nakatomi; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery.

Authors:  William T Couldwell; Chad D Cole; Ossama Al-Mefty
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  The molecular genetics and tumor pathogenesis of meningiomas and the future directions of meningioma treatments.

Authors:  Winward Choy; Won Kim; Daniel Nagasawa; Stephanie Stramotas; Andrew Yew; Quinton Gopen; Andrew T Parsa; Isaac Yang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Recurrence of olfactory groove meningiomas.

Authors:  Fayez Obeid; Ossama Al-Mefty
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas.

Authors:  F DeMonte; H K Smith; O al-Mefty
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Sodium fluorescein in skull base meningiomas: a technical note.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo da Silva; Vinicius Duval da Silva; Jefferson Luis Braga da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.876

View more
  5 in total

1.  Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base.

Authors:  Torstein R Meling; Michele Da Broi; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  WHO grade I meningiomas: classification-tree for prognostic factors of survival.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Lemée; Holger Joswig; Michele Da Broi; Marco Vincenzo Corniola; David Scheie; Karl Schaller; Eirik Helseth; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Discussion on: Usefulness of an Osteotomy Template for Skull Tumorectomy and Simultaneous Skull Reconstruction.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Ryan J Murphy; Mehran Armand; Peter Liacouras; Jon Weingart; Judy Huang; Henry Brem; Michael Lim
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas without bone invasion-still skull base surgery?

Authors:  Marco V Corniola; Jean-Michel Lemée; Karl Schaller; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Extent of Resection in Meningioma: Predictive Factors and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Lemée; Marco V Corniola; Michele Da Broi; Holger Joswig; David Scheie; Karl Schaller; Eirik Helseth; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.