| Literature DB >> 31663005 |
Matthew L Vopat1, Maaz Hassan2, Tanner Poppe2, Armin Tarakemeh2, Rosey Zackula1, Mary K Mulcahey3, Scott Mullen2, Rick Burkholder4, John Paul Schroeppel2, Bryan G Vopat2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of turf toe injuries has increased in recent years. However, uncertainty remains as to how to optimally treat turf toe injuries and the implications that the severity of the injury has on outcomes, specifically return to sport (RTS).Entities:
Keywords: meta-analysis; metatarsophalangeal joint sprain; return to sport; systematic review; turf toe
Year: 2019 PMID: 31663005 PMCID: PMC6792281 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119875133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Flow diagram for study selection with individual participant data (IPD). This is our flowchart following the PRISMA-IPD (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses of Individual Patient Data) guidelines.[17]
Study Characteristics
| First Author | Study Design | Level of Evidence | No. of Injuries | Sex (male/female), n | Mean Age, y | Sport, n | Position in Sport, n | Level of Competition, n | Grade of Injury, n | Treatment, n | Mean Time to RTS, wk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith[ | Case series | 4 | 15 | 15/0 | 19 | Football: 15 | OL: 3; OS: 5; DL: 5; DS: 2 | Professional: 1; college: 11; high school: 3 | Grade III: 15 | Surgery: 15 | 16.5 |
| Covell[ | Case series | 4 | 19 | 19/0 | 24.4 | Football: 18; baseball: 1 | RB: 5; FB: 1; LB: 3; S: 2; OT: 1; OG: 1; WR: 3; DE: 1; QB: 1; 3B: 1 | Professional: 12; college: 6; high school: 1 | Grade III: 19 | Surgery: 19 | 14.7 |
| Anderson[ | Case series | 4 | 9 | 8/1 | N/A (range, 18-33) | Football: 8; N/A: 1 | N/A | College/professional: 9 | Grade III: 9 | Surgery: 9 | N/A |
| Roche[ | Case report | 5 | 1 | 1/0 | 31 | Soccer: 1 | N/A | Elite: 1 | Grade III: 1 | Surgery: 1 | 23.9 |
| Drakos[ | Case series | 4 | 3 | 3/0 | 20.3 | Football: 3 | RB: 1; OL: 1; LB: 1 | College: 3 | Grade III: 3 | Surgery: 3 | 26.1 |
| Faltus[ | Case series | 4 | 5 | 5/0 | 20.4 | Football: 5 | RB: 1; FB: 1; OL: 2; DL: 1 | College: 5 | Grade II: 1; grade III: 4 | Surgery: 5 | 14.6 |
| Clanton[ | Case series | 4 | 55 | N/A | N/A | Football: 53; track: 2 | N/A | College: 55 | N/A: 55 | Surgery: 1; nonoperative: 54 | 0.9 |
| Lohrer[ | Case report | 5 | 1 | 0/1 | 26 | Sprinting: 1 | Sprinter: 1 | Professional: 1 | Grade II: 1 | Surgery: 1 | 26.1 |
| Coker[ | Case series | 4 | 7 | 7/0 | N/A | Football: 6; basketball: 1 | RB: 4; QB: 1; N/A: 2 | Recreational: 1; college: 1; high school: 1; N/A: 4 | Grade II: 3; grade III: 4 | Surgery: 3; nonoperative: 4 | 44.6 |
| Rodeo[ | Case series | 4 | 4 | 4/0 | 22.75 | Football: 4 | TE: 2; TB: 1; OL: 1 | Professional: 3; college: 1 | Grade II: 4 | Surgery: 4 | 7.0 |
| Sahin[ | Case report | 5 | 1 | 1/0 | 19 | Taekwondo: 1 | N/A | Professional: 1 | Grade I: 1 | Surgery: 1 | 13.0 |
| Mullis[ | Case report | 5 | 1 | 1/0 | 18 | Basketball/baseball: 1 | N/A | High school: 1 | N/A: 1 | Surgery: 1 | 30.4 |
| Total | 121 | 64/2 | Football: 112, soccer: 1, track: 3, basketball: 2, baseball: 1, taekwondo: 1, N/A: 1 | OL: 7; OS: 5; DL: 6; DS: 2; RB: 11; FB: 2; LB: 4; S: 2; OT: 1; OG: 1; WR: 3; DE: 1; QB: 2; Sprinter: 1; 3B: 1; TE: 2; TB: 1; N/A: 69 | Professional: 18; college: 82; high school: 6; recreational: 1; elite: 1; N/A: 13 | Grade I: 1; grade II: 9; grade III: 55; N/A: 56 | Surgery: 63; nonoperative: 58 |
3B, third base; DE, defensive end; DL, defensive lineman; DS, defensive skill; FB, fullback; LB, linebacker; N/A, not available; OG, offensive guard; OL, offensive lineman; OS, offensive skill; OT, offensive tackle; QB, quarterback; RB, running back; RTS, return to sport; S, safety; TB, tailback; TE, tight end; WR, wide receiver.
High variability.
Time to Return to Sport
| Variable | n | RTS, Median (Range), wk |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade of injury | .016 | ||
| Grade I | 1 | 13.04 (13.04-13.04) | |
| Grade II | 7 | 8.70 (3.00-26.07) | |
| Grade III | 41 | 16.50 (10.00-156.43) | |
| Level of competition | .018 | ||
| High school | 5 | 16.50 (3.00-26.10) | |
| College | 25 | 16.50 (8.70-26.10) | |
| Professional | 17 | 14.70 (6.00-26.07) | |
| Treatment | <.001 | ||
| Nonoperative | 2 | 5.85 (3.00-8.70) | |
| Surgery | 47 | 14.70 (6.00-156.43) | |
| Sport | N/A | ||
| Basketball | 1 | 6.00 (6.00-6.00) | |
| Baseball | 1 | 14.70 (14.70-14.70) | |
| Football | 44 | 14.70 (3.00-156.43) | |
| Soccer | 1 | 23.90 (23.90-23.90) | |
| Taekwondo | 2 | 13.04 (13.04-13.04) | |
| Track | 1 | 26.07 (26.07-26.07) | |
| Football position | N/A | ||
| Tailback and fullback | 1 | 18.00 (18.00-18.00) | |
| Offensive and defensive lineman | 19 | 16.44 (7.00-26.10) |
Patients unable to be classified by grade of injury were excluded from this analysis. N/A,not available; RTS, return to sport.
Mann-Whitney U test.
Two patients had bilateral injuries.
Kruskal-Wallis test.
One patient was a multisport athlete, resulting in n = 49 for treatment and n = 50 for sport.
Figure 2.Quantitative bias analysis table. This table shows the bias for each study reviewed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.[8] *Other bias: Coker[3] (1978), reporting bias; Covell[4] (2017), recall bias; and Anderson[1] (2002), recall bias.