Emi Hoshikawa1,2, Taisuke Sato3, Yoshitaka Kimori4, Ayako Suzuki1, Kenta Haga1, Hiroko Kato1, Koichi Tabeta2, Daisuke Nanba5, Kenji Izumi1. 1. Division of Biomimetics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan. 2. Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Biological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan. 3. Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Institute for Research Promotion, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan. 4. Department of Management and Information Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Information Sciences, Fukui University of Technology, Fukui, Japan. 5. Department of Stem Cell Biology, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Image-based cell/colony analyses offer promising solutions to compensate for the lack of quality control (QC) tools for noninvasive monitoring of cultured cells, a regulatory challenge in regenerative medicine. Here, the feasibility of two image analysis algorithms, optical flow and normalised cross-correlation, to noninvasively measure cell/colony motion in human primary oral keratinocytes for screening the proliferative capacity of cells in the early phases of cell culture were examined. We applied our software to movies converted from 96 consecutive time-lapse phase-contrast images of an oral keratinocyte culture. After segmenting the growing colonies, two indices were calculated based on each algorithm. The correlation between each index of the colonies and their proliferative capacity was evaluated. The software was able to assess cell/colony motion noninvasively, and each index reflected the observed cell kinetics. A positive linear correlation was found between cell/colony motion and proliferative capacity, indicating that both algorithms are potential tools for QC.
Image-based cell/colony analyses offer promising solutions to compensate for the lack of quality control (QC) tools for noninvasive monitoring of cultured cells, a regulatory challenge in regenerative medicine. Here, the feasibility of two image analysis algorithms, optical flow and normalised cross-correlation, to noninvasively measure cell/colony motion in human primary oral keratinocytes for screening the proliferative capacity of cells in the early phases of cell culture were examined. We applied our software to movies converted from 96 consecutive time-lapse phase-contrast images of an oral keratinocyte culture. After segmenting the growing colonies, two indices were calculated based on each algorithm. The correlation between each index of the colonies and their proliferative capacity was evaluated. The software was able to assess cell/colony motion noninvasively, and each index reflected the observed cell kinetics. A positive linear correlation was found between cell/colony motion and proliferative capacity, indicating that both algorithms are potential tools for QC.
Recent advances in epidermal and corneal epithelial tissue engineering have led to a
state in which tissue defects caused by diseases or injuries can be replaced or
repaired using autologous tissues and cells.[1,2] Achieving maximum therapeutic
effects depends on the retention of keratinocyte stem cell populations in culture
for epidermal and corneal cell sheet grafting. This status should be validated by
quality control (QC) during manufacturing in the field of regenerative medicine.[3] In the laboratory, to monitor stem cell maintenance during cell culture,
retrospective methods and molecular biological analyses such as quantitative
polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry have been employed to assess
cellular characteristics at specific time points. However, because the destructive
nature of these methods does not allow real-time and aseptic assessments over time,
such methods are not optimal for the QC of cells for therapeutic use. The lack of
effective metrics for cell quality, which are noninvasive and produce quantitative
parameters, is a significant problem and is an obstacle to the development of
quality-assured cellular products for clinical use that are compliant with
regulatory requirements.[4] Therefore, expert technicians’ manual observation for monitoring cells is
still being used as a QC method in facilities that manufacture cellular products;
however, such empirical approaches are non-quantitative and require experienced
skills.As a cell source for therapeutic use, oral keratinocytes have been clinically applied
to treat corneal and oesophageal lesions in humans using cell sheet engineering and
have been used to reconstruct oral mucosa defects using three-dimensional (3D)
cellular constructs, such as ex vivo-produced oral mucosa
equivalents.[5-7] Although oral
keratinocytes have not been introduced commercially as biological products, the cell
engineering process needs to be compliant with regulatory requirements to ensure the
safety and efficacy of engineered cellular products.[8] Because there are no universal guidelines for assessing those products during
manufacturing for use in humans, it is necessary for manufacturers to evaluate each
product independently on a case-by-case basis to conform to Food and Drug
Administration requirements.[9]Because developing a noninvasive approach for the QC of cultured cells is crucial,
the use of image processing to quantitatively analyse information obtained from
microscopic images has been attractive for noninvasive cell quality evaluation.
Recently, cell morphology-based image analyses and subsequent predictions were
successfully applied to mesenchymal stem cells and colonies and to induced
pluripotent cells, evaluating individual microscopic images for monitoring cell and
colony status.[10-13] For epidermal keratinocytes,
the rotational speed of a two-cell colony that is monitored noninvasively using
image analysis can be used to predict its proliferative potential at an early stage
of cell culture, providing robust evidence that cell motion is correlated with stemness.[14] Thus, it is likely that an oral keratinocyte stem cell population also has a
significant proliferative capacity, although this has not been identified due to the
lack of specific markers.[15] In contrast, the measurement of rotational speed appears to be difficult to
apply to oral keratinocytes because the colonies are less densely packed than those
of epidermal keratinocytes due to the feeder layer-free culture system, which is
imposed by the selective nature of oral and maxillofacial surgery.[16] There is an apparent need to develop various methods to monitor cell motion
specific to oral keratinocytes because there is currently no method available to
measure proliferative capacity in a noninvasive manner.To quantitatively and noninvasively analyse the motion of keratinocyte cells and
colonies, we implemented two image analysis algorithms: optical flow (OF) and
normalised cross-correlation (NCC). We used two approaches because multiple analyses
enhance the reliability and robustness of QC in regenerative medicine. OF refers to
the distribution of the apparent motion of brightness patterns between two
consecutive frames, caused by the movement of objects.[17] OF produces a two-dimensional (2D) vector field in which each vector is a
displacement vector showing the movement of points from the first frame to the
second. The vector field provides information about the rate of change of the
arrangement of the objects. The similarity in colony morphology between adjacent
time frames was also measured using the NCC method.[18] NCC is a simple and effective method of measuring similarity and is robust
against variations in image brightness. It has been widely used in image matching
and image recognition technology based on computer vision, such as object detection,
tracking and stereo matching.[19-22] Although both algorithms have
been often applied to the study of cell behaviour and function in basic science,
there are few applications of their use in regenerative medicine. To apply each cell
motion measurement algorithm as a QC tool, we established two-cell kinetic
parameters: mean motion speed (MMS) and mean dynamic index (MDI), based on OF and
NCC, respectively. The combination of time-lapse observation of oral keratinocytes
and image processing analyses allows the generation of quantitative, noninvasive
imaging metrics by recognising and tracing individual cells within colonies.This study aims to examine the applicability and feasibility of the two basic
indices, motion speed (MS) and dynamic index (DI), by applying two algorithms, OF
and NCC, to produce a noninvasive and quantitative tool for the evaluation of oral
keratinocyte cell and colony motion. We analysed the correlation between the
proliferative capacity of oral keratinocytes and the two-cell kinetic parameters,
MMS and MDI of the colonies. These cell/colony motion indices have a lot of
potential for use in QC of cells in regenerative medicine and pharmacological
screening.
Materials and methods
Procurement of oral tissue samples
The protocol for obtaining human oral mucosa tissue samples was approved by the
Niigata University Medical & Dental Sciences Hospital Internal Review Board
(2015–5018). Patients who underwent minor dentoalveolar surgery were provided
with sufficient information regarding this study, and all participating
individuals signed an informed consent form.
Primary oral mucosa keratinocyte culture
Primary oral mucosa keratinocyte cultures were established, and cells were
serially subcultured as previously described.[23] Briefly, after excess blood on the tissue specimen was removed using a
scalpel, the specimen was transferred to a 0.025% trypsin/EDTA solution (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 1.5% Antibiotic-Antimycotic
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) and soaked for approximately 16 h at room
temperature. Oral mucosa keratinocytes were mechanically dissociated from the
underlying connective tissue in a 0.0125% defined trypsin inhibitor (Thermo
Fisher Scientific), resuspended in ‘complete’ EpiLife® supplemented
with EpiLife Defined Growth Supplements (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.06 mM
Ca2+, plated at a density of 3.0–4.0 × 105 cells in a
35 mm dish (Eppendorf) with complete EpiLife® medium, and fed every
other day. Four days after cell plating, the 35 mm dish was subjected to
time-lapse observation.
Time-lapse imaging and image processing
Cells grown in the 35 mm dish were imaged using a Keyence BZ-X710 all-in-one
fluorescence microscope equipped with a 5% CO2 and
temperature-controlled chamber and time-lapse tracking system (Keyence, Osaka,
Japan). Phase-contrast images were acquired at 15 min intervals for 24 h,
producing a total of 96 images, using ×4 PlanFluor NA0.13 PhL objective lens.
The images were converted to video files using a BZ-X analyser (Keyence)
(Supplemental material 1 and 2). The video files were analysed using our image analysis
software based on the OF and NCC algorithms. Two information scientists blinded
to any information about the cells randomly chose colonies.
Principles of the image analyses for quantitative, noninvasive measurement of
oral keratinocyte colony motion
(1) Optical flow
OF is an image processing algorithm that can track motion between two
consecutive images. OF is a well-studied algorithm in computer vision and is
useful for following the movement of objects that possess intricate shapes.
It is also advantageous when individual objects, such as cells and/or cell
colonies, cannot be identified. Thus, in the life sciences, this technique
is useful in the kinematic analysis of living bodies.[24-26] In
this study, the cells’ motion captured in time-lapse movies was quantified
using the OF computation methods. OF analysis was performed using the
Farnebäck algorithm,[27] which is based on polynomial expansion. Although the OF algorithm
includes the Lucas–Kanade method[28] among others, this study used the Farnebäck method because of its
high accuracy compared with other methods. Using this algorithm, the motion
was estimated with high accuracy by approximating the intensity of each
pixel with a quadratic polynomial and comparing the coefficients between
frames.Let f(r) be the intensity of a
pixel located at r in the frame corresponding to time
t, then f(r)
is described as followswhere r is a position vector indicating the position (x,
y), A is a symmetric matrix, b is a
vector and is a scalar. Expand the above equationwhere are obtained by normalised convolution in the
neighbourhood of r. The displacement vector v at r from the frame t to
t + 1 is estimated using
f(r) =
f1(r
+
v) as followsThe displacement vector v indicates how much a position (x, y) in the image
has moved from the image in the frame corresponding to time
t to the next. To calculate the solution stably, the
coefficient A is approximated as followsUsing , we obtainwhere . In the Farnebäck algorithm, the energy function over a
neighbourhood B of r is introduced as
followswhere becomes a weight function for the
points in the neighbourhood . The displacement vector v(r) is determined to minimise the energy and is obtained
usingThe actual displacement vectors are estimated by an iterative operation based
on the above equation. The result from this processing is a 2D vector field
in which for each pixel in the image, there is a displacement vector
v.In this study, we used the highly optimised code (OpenCV library, ver.3.4) to
perform calculations using the Farnebäck algorithm. As calculation
parameters, the neighbourhood area size was set to 5 × 5 pixels and other
parameters used default values. The runtimes are approximately 270 s on a
1920 × 1440 resolution for cell images (96 frames) using a single CPU (core
i7-7700K, 4.20 GHz) core on a common desktop PC (memory, 16 GB).
(2) Template matching based on NCC
Template matching based on cross-correlation is a basic statistical approach
for image recognition and can evaluate the correspondence between a template
image and an input image. It gives a measure of the degree of similarity
between the two images. In the present study, NCC[18] was used for template matching. In NCC, the cross-correlation value
is calculated by subtracting the average value of the intensity from each
calculation region. It has the advantage of not being very susceptible to
variations in image brightness and noise. In this study, the target colony
region was tracked in all frames, and the motion of cells based on
similarity was calculated between neighbouring frame pairs.
Determination of MS of the colony
The Farnebäck algorithm obtained from the OpenCV library gives the displacement
vector of each pixel in every two consecutive frames of the video (Figure 1(a)). In Figure 1(a), the
displacement vectors are indicated by blue dots. The magnitude of the
displacement vector signifies the displacement of motion, and the angle of the
vector specifies the direction of the motion, which is called the motion vector.
The motion vector at each pixel is drawn on every frame, the displacement of
their motion is shown by the magnitude of the motion vectors and their direction
is indicated by the angle of the motion vectors. A total of 96 sequence frames
were created, in which vectors are drawn on the extracted area of the colony in
each image (Figure 1;
Supplemental material 3). Pixels with larger movements have
larger motion vectors.
Figure 1.
Basic principles of the OF algorithm used to calculate the MS: (a) A
representative distribution of the displacement vectors calculated by OF
analysis is shown for three extracted colonies, labelled 1, 2 and 3. All
three colonies are used for explaining the following methods and
results. The original video file is provided in Supplemental material 1 and 2 movies and (b) higher
magnification of colony 2, surrounded by a red line in Figure 1(a). The
motion speed of colony 2 was determined as the mean value of the
magnitude of vectors with values greater than 1 within the region.
Basic principles of the OF algorithm used to calculate the MS: (a) A
representative distribution of the displacement vectors calculated by OF
analysis is shown for three extracted colonies, labelled 1, 2 and 3. All
three colonies are used for explaining the following methods and
results. The original video file is provided in Supplemental material 1 and 2 movies and (b) higher
magnification of colony 2, surrounded by a red line in Figure 1(a). The
motion speed of colony 2 was determined as the mean value of the
magnitude of vectors with values greater than 1 within the region.In our preliminary experiment, when we calculated the MS
(||vt||) of only the background in which the
cell/colony area was not contained, the ||vt|| reached a
maximum of 0.57 pixels/frame. In contrast, when we calculated the MS of the
cell/colony area, the minimum was 1.12 pixels/frame. Consequently, in this
experiment, we defined the area whose MS is equal to or greater than 1.00
pixel/frame as corresponding to a cell/colony area. Therefore, as shown in Figure 1(b), after
applying the boxed area surrounded by a red line that contained the extracted
colony on the movie file, the mean speed of cells/colony at frame
t is calculated aswhere is the mean speed (pixel/frame) at frame t,
v(r) is the displacement vector calculated using OF,
r is a position vector and N is the total number of pixels
added. Thus, the mean speed of each frame is obtained. However, for further
accuracy improvement of , we believe that it is necessary to extract the area of cell/colony for
calculation by using another technique such as ‘semantic segmentation’ and so on.[29] Further system improvement is currently underway.To convert the number of pixels into the distance that the target cells have
moved, we used Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA,
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). The 100-μm scale bar on the movie
was determined to be equal to 53.3333 pixels; the resulting one pixel is
identical to 1.875 μm in these images. Moreover, because the interval between
the frames in the time-lapse movie is 15 min, the speed per hour (60 min) of the
target cells can be calculated by multiplying by 4 (= 60 / 15). As a result, the
resulting MS in μm/h was calculated by multiplying
S by the coefficient of 7.5 (= 1.875 × 4).
Determination of the DI of the colony using the template-matching
approach
The motion of the colony-forming cells was also quantitatively measured and
evaluated using the DI. DI is calculated using the template-matching approach
NCC. The template-matching approach was performed to measure the similarity
between the template (the cell colony region in the i-th frame)
and overlapping areas in the (i + 1)-th frame. The NCC
coefficient (ρ) between the template and the input image at
position (x, y) is defined as followsHere, I is the input image, T is a template of
size L × M pixels and
is a partial
image of at position (, and that region
coincides with T. The average intensity values in the partial
image and the template are given by
µ( (x, y))
and µ(T), respectively. These are given as
followsThe position of the maximum coefficient value (ρmax)
corresponds to the position of the colony of interest. This position is
estimated in each frame, and the coefficient value is used for cell/colony
motion analysis.The proposed template-matching approach is as follows (Figure 2):
Figure 2.
Illustration of the template-matching procedure in the NCC. Basic
principle of the NCC algorithm to calculate the normalised
cross-correlation coefficient (ρ), which is finally
converted into the DI.
Marking target colonies: The target colonies to be tracked are extracted
manually from the first frame. The colony region is marked, and the
centroid of this region is defined as the position of the target colony. The
first template is generated by cropping around the centroid.Finding the next template in the second frame: Template matching in the
second frame is performed in a search window of size Sx
× Sy pixels around the centroid of the current
template. The best-matching region is extracted as the next
template.Template updating: Template matching is performed in the third frame
using the template from the second frame. The best-matching region in
the third frame is extracted as the template for the third frame.Iterating ‘Steps 2 and 3’ in subsequent frames: Templates of the
i-th frame (i = 2, 3, 4, . . .,
N) are used as the updated templates for template
matching in the next frame.Illustration of the template-matching procedure in the NCC. Basic
principle of the NCC algorithm to calculate the normalised
cross-correlation coefficient (ρ), which is finally
converted into the DI.The extracted cell/colony motion was analysed using this method. The DI computes
the difference in the state of colonies between consecutive frames; its value
reflects the shape and size of colonies that change over time. The DI of the
k-th extracted colony is defined as followswhere N denotes the total number of frames. The value obtained
by averaging the dissimilarities of the k-th colony over all
frames represents the motion of the k-th colony. Higher values
of this index indicate greater cell/colony motion.
Determination of the proliferative capacity of a targeted colony
Twenty-four hours after the time-lapse imaging was completed, cultured oral
keratinocytes in the 35 mm dish were fixed with 10% formalin, resulting in a
total of 144 h in culture. The entire surface of the dish was scanned using the
Keyence BZ-X700 all-in-one fluorescence microscope. The number of cells
comprising each target colony was manually counted in the first image of the
time-lapse tracking (Figure
3(a): The number of cells in each colony is six in colony 1, six in
colony 2, and two in colony 3) as well as in the entire scanned image (Figure 3(b): The number of
cells in each colony is 13 in colony 1, 16 in colony 2, and 4 in colony 3). As a
parameter of proliferative capacity, population doublings (PD) were calculated
using the following formula[30]
Figure 3.
Illustration of the method of determining the proliferative capacity of
the extracted colonies: (a) A representative area of the initial image
of time-lapse observation, including three extracted colonies that are
enclosed with individual boxes, labelled colonies 1, 2 and 3,
delineating with lines coloured light green, red and blue. The number of
cells is six in colony 1, six in colony 2, and two in colony 3 and (b)
the entire image scanned after fixation of the culture dish, identical
to Figure 3(a). After 48 h in culture, cells in all colonies
proliferated and produced daughter cells, resulting in 13 cells in
colony 1, 16 in colony 2, and 4 in colony 3.
where N = number of cells within the resulted colony and N0 = number
of cells within the initial colony in the first image of the time-lapse
tracking.Illustration of the method of determining the proliferative capacity of
the extracted colonies: (a) A representative area of the initial image
of time-lapse observation, including three extracted colonies that are
enclosed with individual boxes, labelled colonies 1, 2 and 3,
delineating with lines coloured light green, red and blue. The number of
cells is six in colony 1, six in colony 2, and two in colony 3 and (b)
the entire image scanned after fixation of the culture dish, identical
to Figure 3(a). After 48 h in culture, cells in all colonies
proliferated and produced daughter cells, resulting in 13 cells in
colony 1, 16 in colony 2, and 4 in colony 3.A step-by-step chart of this experimental design and procedures is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A step-by-step chart of the experimental design and procedures.
A step-by-step chart of the experimental design and procedures.
Validation of two algorithms
Furthermore, we validated the OF algorithm used in this study by comparing the MS
in three representative colonies with the data obtained by manual tracking of
individual cells within each colony. The detailed information is described in
Supplemental material 4.
Statistical analysis
To examine the strength of a linear association between PD and MMS/PD and MDI,
the Pearson correlation coefficient was used, and coefficient,
r, and p values were calculated using
Excel.
Data availability
The software and datasets generated and analysed during this study can be
provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request due to pending
patent application.
Results
Calculation of the MMS and MDI of individual colonies
To implement a quantitative measurement of cell/colony motion, two algorithms
were applied to target colonies on the video files. The motion behaviour of
individual cells/colonies was successfully quantified, indicating that both
indices, MS and DI, can be applicable and feasible for the quantitative
measurement of cell/colony motion (Figures 5(a) and (b)). The sum of the MS of the total 96
frames was divided by the 96 results in MMS (µm/hour), producing a
representative MS for the target colony. The average of the total 96 DIs was
used to produce the MDI, a representative value of a target colony’s DI. The
MMSs (mean ± standard deviation) of the colony of 1, 2 and 3 were 35.27 ± 10.54,
30.42 ± 8.97 and 27.98 ± 11.64 (µm/hour) and their MDIs (mean ± standard
deviation) were 0.58 ± 0.11, 0.54 ± 0.10 and 0.40 ± 0.13, respectively. The
ordering of the MMSs of three colonies is the same as that of their MDIs.
Figure 5.
Representative outcomes of MS and DI of colonies 1, 2 and 3 in the 96
frames: (a) Changes in MS of colonies 1, 2 and 3, as shown in Figures 3(a) and
(b) during
time-lapse microscopic observation; (b) changes of DI of colonies 1, 2
and 3, as shown in Figures 3(a) and (b) during time-lapse microscopic
observation; and (c) changes in MS (green, red and blue solid line) are
overlaid on those of DI (green, red and blue dotted line) of all three
colonies, as shown in Figures 3(a) and (b).
Representative outcomes of MS and DI of colonies 1, 2 and 3 in the 96
frames: (a) Changes in MS of colonies 1, 2 and 3, as shown in Figures 3(a) and
(b) during
time-lapse microscopic observation; (b) changes of DI of colonies 1, 2
and 3, as shown in Figures 3(a) and (b) during time-lapse microscopic
observation; and (c) changes in MS (green, red and blue solid line) are
overlaid on those of DI (green, red and blue dotted line) of all three
colonies, as shown in Figures 3(a) and (b).Changes in the MS and DI of all three colonies during time-lapse microscopic
observation were compared by overlaying with the histograms (Figure 5(c)). Although the
two histograms are not comparable, because they are completely different
parameters, the changing pattern appears to be similar between the two
histograms.Furthermore, the data obtained by manual tracking of an individual cell within
three colonies demonstrated the validation of the OF algorithm used in this
study (Supplemental material 4). In addition, it is possible the
validation of the NCC algorithm have been achieved based on the finding that DI
becomes higher when cells/colonies move faster. Thus, the DI calculated by the
NCC algorithm represents an appropriate parameter for evaluating cell/colony
motion.
Correlation of the proliferative capacity of oral keratinocyte colonies with
MMS and MDI
When the MMS and MDI of all of the colonies were examined and their PDs were
plotted on a scatterplot, both showed low-to-moderate positive linear
correlation with PD, which was statistically significant (Figures 6(a) and (b)). Thus, oral keratinocyte cell
colonies possessing higher proliferative capacity appeared to have higher MMS
and MDI values, implying a higher locomotive ability.
Figure 6.
Correlation of the two indices of oral keratinocytes colonies with their
proliferative capacity: (a) Scatterplot showing the correlation of MMS
between individual colonies and their proliferative capacity (PD). The
trend line is shown, and its equation and the correlation coefficient
are shown. Pearson’s r = 0.398, p =
2.60E-10 and n = 234 colonies obtained from 13
individuals and (b) scatterplot showing the correlation of MDI between
individual colonies and their proliferative capacity (PD). The trend
line is shown, and its equation and the correlation coefficient are
shown. Pearson’s r = 0.28, p = 0.002
and n = 120 colonies obtained from 11 individuals.
Correlation of the two indices of oral keratinocytes colonies with their
proliferative capacity: (a) Scatterplot showing the correlation of MMS
between individual colonies and their proliferative capacity (PD). The
trend line is shown, and its equation and the correlation coefficient
are shown. Pearson’s r = 0.398, p =
2.60E-10 and n = 234 colonies obtained from 13
individuals and (b) scatterplot showing the correlation of MDI between
individual colonies and their proliferative capacity (PD). The trend
line is shown, and its equation and the correlation coefficient are
shown. Pearson’s r = 0.28, p = 0.002
and n = 120 colonies obtained from 11 individuals.
Discussion
The quality of cells for therapeutic use during engineering is increasingly acquiring
importance, as the final product needs to maximise safety, efficiency and quality in
preclinical and clinical trials.[31] Therefore, the quality of cell therapy products depends on the establishment
of a robust QC system for maintaining the consistency of the final product during manufacturing.[9] Image analysis during manufacturing cells has considerable potential to
provide a part of the solution of this issue.[32-34] For iPS and mesenchymal stem
cells, noninvasive image-based cell quality evaluation has been used to predict and
evaluate the performance of cell cultures by using image processing technology with
specific morphological parameters to determine the relationships between
morphological information and cellular quality.[4,11,12] Recent developments in cell
image analyses offer unique opportunities for biological applications, such as the
discovery of efficient cell behaviour in response to different cell culture
conditions and adaptive experiment control.[35] Although advances in optics and imaging systems facilitate the visualisation
of a living cell’s dynamic processes using time-lapse microscopy images, there have
been few studies that have evaluated the applicability of these metrics to the cell
manufacturing process, especially for epithelial cells.[14] In the present study using oral keratinocytes, for the first time, we applied
two algorithms to quantitatively and noninvasively analyse cell/colony motion,
producing a label-free tool for the QC of cells in order to produce enhanced
biological products.When we applied the two image analysis algorithms to the time-lapse microscopic video
of primary human oral keratinocytes colonies, MS and DI were calculated and
determined without any problems, enabling us to noninvasively and quantitatively
measure the motion of cells and colonies. This finding suggests that both indices,
which are based on the OF and NCC algorithms, can be utilised as potential
analytical tools for monitoring complex cell/colony motion. We also found that the
cell/colony motion of oral keratinocytes had a low-to-moderate positive linear
correlation with their proliferative capacity. Collectively, the image analysis
methods used in this study suggested the usefulness of our approach as a
noninvasive, quantitative tool for the evaluation of cell/colony motion. Therefore,
both MMS and MDI are applicable and feasible for noninvasive monitoring of oral
keratinocytes and can potentially be used as tools for QC in regenerative
medicine.This preliminary study also revealed that each algorithm has strengths and weaknesses
when measuring cell/colony motion because the purpose of developing the OF algorithm
is different from that for NCC algorithm. OF is useful for measuring the movement of
objects with complicated structures and contours. However, NCC could categorise the
translational motion without any contour changes in the object as no movement. Data
accuracy in OF decreases when the object travels a lot. However, template matching,
used in NCC, is robust, and the accuracy is not affected in such a case.
Nonetheless, as shown in Figure
4(c), the identical order of the two indices obtained from three colonies
and the similar outcomes obtained from the two algorithms indicate that each
compensates for the limitations of the other, suggesting that the quantitative
measurements acquired using two different algorithms collaborate efficiently.[36]Instead of developing a new technique or approach for specific experimental
conditions such as cell migration, an existing technique might allow the analysis or
the combination with existing techniques may solve the problem.[37,38] Although OF
and NCC are common algorithms for general motion estimation applied to cell
cultures, DI calculated by the NCC algorithm represents an original and novel index
for evaluating oral keratinocyte cell motion without using speed. Therefore, DI,
which is different from MS, is a parameter that permits multifaceted analysis.
Because monitoring cells using multiple parameters can ensure a robust QC of cells
before transplantation, our strategy may provide a way to use current algorithms
more efficiently.[39]Further improvements and upgrades to the software will be necessary to avoid
overestimation in performance for clinical outcomes in future use. For example, oral
keratinocytes not only move but also rotate. Our software should be able to capture
the rotational motion of cells unless the contours of the cells alter, which is
highly unlikely when cells rotate. Nonetheless, the biological significance and
mechanisms of the difference in cell motion between rotation and translation have
never been elucidated. A weighting for either rotational motion or translational
motion may be required in the programme, because epidermal keratinocytes with
significant proliferative capacity rotate faster.[14] In addition, OF and NCC did not always capture the dynamics of cell division
precisely, because cells shrink and temporarily stop moving while they
divide.[35,40] Further investigations are needed to develop updated software
to measure all types of cell motion that allow clinical applications of algorithms.
In addition, the molecular mechanisms of cell motion and cellular proliferative
capacity need to be investigated.[41-43]However, the algorithms used in this study have some limitations. A major limitation
is that the data we obtained from phase-contrast microscopy were 2D image series,
while cell motion is characterised in three dimensions: not only x- and y-axis but
also z-axis. Using the current format of both the OF and NCC algorithms, we were
unable to analyse the motion towards the z-axis. To enhance the QC of cells in
vitro, the ultimate goal is to implement 3D cell motion analysis.[44] Recent studies reported a 3D-imaging system for cell tracking using
label-free cells.[45,46] Consequently, wider applications of our algorithms are expected
by upgrading the current OF and NCC algorithms that enable calculation of MS and DI
in 3D image series acquired from different image modules.This study demonstrated a positive correlation between cell/colony motions and
proliferative capacity at the level of individual colonies consisting of multiple
cells, during the initial phase of cell culture. However, as cells proliferate,
sampling of distinct colonies will be impossible, due to an increase in cell confluency.[36] Thus, the current protocol is not appropriate to measure the status of the
entire cell population. In a clinical setting in which a larger number of cells are
present in culture, an alternative protocol is needed to produce a culture
vessel-based measurement, instead of a single colony base evaluation, for the later
phase of cell culture, in order to eliminate a substandard cell population as a QC.
Therefore, our next step will be to explore and validate other noninvasive
measurement protocols using MMS and MDI, such as metrics, to evaluate changes in
duration, area and timing, in order to determine a proliferating capacity for each
culture vessel, an approach which should be more clinically based and realistic for
regenerative medicine.Compared with the remarkable advances in manufacturing of cell and tissue products
associated with cell culture technologies, the advances in technologies and
methodologies that are informative and efficient for process control obtained by
evaluating and analysing the quality of cells for cell-based therapies are lagging
behind. Moreover, technologies to measure and evaluate the quality of cells are
nascent, and there is a lack of understanding of the current limitations of our
technological and methodological abilities to evaluate the quality of cells. These
are therefore serious challenges in regenerative medicine. Consistent manufacturing
of stable cell/tissue-based products with high quality is required to ensure the
consequent outcomes after clinical applications; thus, exploiting information
sciences and image-based processing or integrating them with the existing
methodologies should be important in regenerative medicine.[47] It is also necessary to develop new analytical tools of quality metrology;
however, the choice of parameters of noninvasive assessments needs to be considered,
depending on the anticipated performances of the products.[48-50]
Conclusion
In conclusion, in this preliminary study, cell/colony motions of primary human oral
keratinocytes were successfully measured in a noninvasive and quantitative manner,
using our own software based on two common algorithms, OF and NCC. A positive
correlation between the indices of MMS and MDI showing cell/colony motions and their
proliferative capacity indicated that these metrics are applicable and feasible to
monitor and evaluate cell/colony kinetics during cell culture, demonstrating that MS
and DI can be used as tools for QC in regenerative medicine. Our future goal is to
incorporate this noninvasive technology into current human clinical protocols, in
order to eliminate substandard cell populations prior to transplantation. It is
therefore necessary to further determine the criteria of MMS and MDI of substandard
cells by examining functional assays of keratinocytes with respect to issues, such
as long-term expansion and epithelial regeneration ability.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, S4A_figure for Noninvasive measurement of cell/colony
motion using image analysis methods to evaluate the proliferative capacity of
oral keratinocytes as a tool for quality control in regenerative medicine by Emi
Hoshikawa, Taisuke Sato, Yoshitaka Kimori, Ayako Suzuki, Kenta Haga, Hiroko
Kato, Koichi Tabeta, Daisuke Nanba and Kenji Izumi in Journal of Tissue
EngineeringClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, S4B_figure for Noninvasive measurement of cell/colony
motion using image analysis methods to evaluate the proliferative capacity of
oral keratinocytes as a tool for quality control in regenerative medicine by Emi
Hoshikawa, Taisuke Sato, Yoshitaka Kimori, Ayako Suzuki, Kenta Haga, Hiroko
Kato, Koichi Tabeta, Daisuke Nanba and Kenji Izumi in Journal of Tissue
EngineeringClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, S4C_figure for Noninvasive measurement of cell/colony
motion using image analysis methods to evaluate the proliferative capacity of
oral keratinocytes as a tool for quality control in regenerative medicine by Emi
Hoshikawa, Taisuke Sato, Yoshitaka Kimori, Ayako Suzuki, Kenta Haga, Hiroko
Kato, Koichi Tabeta, Daisuke Nanba and Kenji Izumi in Journal of Tissue
Engineering
Authors: S Kuo; Y Zhou; H M Kim; H Kato; R Y Kim; G R Bayar; C L Marcelo; R T Kennedy; S E Feinberg Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: A R Thomsen; C Aldrian; B Luka; S Hornhardt; M Gomolka; S Moertl; J Hess; H Zitzelsberger; T Heider; N Schlueter; S Rau; B Monroy Ordonez; H Schäfer; G Rücker; M Henke Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-03-16