Long Noncoding RNAs and Repetitive Elements: Junk or Intimate Evolutionary Partners?

Our recent ability to sequence entire genomes, along with all of their transcribed RNAs, has led to the surprising finding that only ∼1% of the human genome is used to encode proteins. This finding has led to vigorous debate over the functional importance of the transcribed but untranslated portions of the genome. Currently, scientists tend to assume coding genes are functional until proven not to be, while the opposite is true for noncoding genes. This review takes a new look at the evidence for and against widespread noncoding gene functionality. We focus in particular on long noncoding RNA (noncoding RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides) genes and their 'junk' associates, transposable elements, and satellite repeats. Taken together, the suggestion put forward is that more of this junk DNA may be functional than nonfunctional and that noncoding RNAs and transposable elements act symbiotically to drive evolution.