| Literature DB >> 31660876 |
Godfred Acheampong1, Michael Owusu1,2, Alex Owusu-Ofori3,4, Isaac Osei1, Nimako Sarpong5, Augustina Sylverken1,6, Hung-Jui Kung7, Shu-Ting Cho7, Chih-Horng Kuo7, Se Eun Park8,9, Florian Marks8, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie3, Ellis Owusu-Dabo10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salmonella infection poses significant public health threat globally, especially in resource-limited countries. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistant strains to fluoroquinolones have led to treatment failures and increased mortality in Salmonella infection. However, there is dearth of information regarding mechanisms of resistance to fluoroquinolones in Ghana. This study therefore sought to identify chromosomal mutations and plasmid-mediated resistance as possible mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance from clinical isolates in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Fluoroquinolone resistance; Mutations; Plasmids; Salmonella enterica
Year: 2019 PMID: 31660876 PMCID: PMC6819380 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4522-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Sequence of primers for detection of gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE genes
| Target gene | Nucleotide sequence (5′ -3′) | Product size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| F 5′ –ATGAGCGACCTTGCGAGAGAGAAATACACCG − 3′ | 632 | [ |
| R 5′ – TTCCATCAGCCCTTCAATGCTGAGTCTTC − 3′ | |||
|
| F 5′ – AAGCGCGATGGCAAAGAAG − 3′ | 1500 | [ |
| R 5′ – AACGGTCTGCTCATCAGAAAGG − 3′ | |||
|
| F 5′- CTATGCGATGTCAGAGCTGG − 3′ | 270 | [ |
| R 5′- TAACAGCAGCTCGGCGTATT − 3′ | |||
|
| F 5′- TCTCTTCCGATGAAGTGCTG − 3′ | 240 | [ |
| R 5′- ATACGGTATAGCGGCGGTAG − 3′ |
Primers used for amplification of PMQR genes
| Name | Sequence | Size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| QnrA-FW | 5′-GGGTAT GGATATTATTGATAAAG-3′ | 660 | [ |
| QnrA-RV | 5′-CTAATCCG GCAGCACTATTA-3′ | ||
| QnrB-FW | 5′-GGMATHGAAATTCGCCACTG-3′ | 264 | [ |
| QnrB-RV | 5′-TTTGCYGYYCGCCAGTCGAA-3′ | ||
| QnrS-FW | 5′-AGTGATCTCACCTTCACCGC-3′ | 550 | [ |
| QnrS-RV | 5′-CAGGCTGCAATTTTGATACC-3′ |
Fig. 1Distribution of bacteremic isolates from study sites. Biobanked bacterial isolates were cultured and identified using standard microbiological culture methods and biochemical tests
Bacterial isolates from stool and oropharynx
| Pathogen | n(%) pathogens from | |
|---|---|---|
| Stool | OPS | |
| 4 (30.8) | 1 (25.0) | |
| NTS | 9 (69.2) | 3 (75.0) |
| Total | 13 (100) | 4 (100) |
Invasive NTS distribution among study population
| Serovar | KATH [n(%)] | APH [n(%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 (18.8) | 7 (43.8) | 0.011 | |
| 5 (31.1) | 0 | 0.034 | |
| Untypable | 1 (6.3) | 0 | – |
MIC of fluoroquinolone resistant and reduced-susceptible Salmonella strains
| Isolate number | MIC (μg/ml) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 16, 18 | 0.500 | I |
| 1, 14, 15 | 0.120 | I |
| 2, 5, 6, 8, 13, 17, 19, 20 | 0.030 | S |
| 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 | 0.015 | S |
I intermediate, S sensitive
Summary of resistance profiles, target gene mutations and prevalence of PMQR genes
| Serovar | Study site | Cip MIC (μg/ml) | Coresistance | Target mutations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Typhi | APH | 0.12 | AMPCSXTNATET |
|
| |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Typhi | APH | 0.03 | AMPCSXTTET |
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Typhi | APH | 0.03 |
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Typhi | APH | 0.03 |
|
| ||
|
| ||||||
| Typhi | APH | 0.03 |
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Enteritidis | KATH | 0.03 | AMPCSXTTET |
| ||
| Enteritidis | KATH | 0.12 |
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Enteritidis | KATH | 0.12 |
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Enteritidis | KATH | 0.50 |
|
| ||
| Typhimurium | APH | 0.03 |
| |||
| Typhimurium | APH | 0.50 | AMPAMC |
|
| |
| Typhimurium | APH | 0.03 | AMPAMC |
| ||
| Typhimurium | APH | 0.03 | AMPCSXTAMC |
| ||
Fig. 2Amplification and detection of qnrS plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistant gene (molecular size 550 bp) by PCR. Lanes 4,8 are positive for qnrS gene (550 bp). Lanes –C, +C are negative and positive controls respectively.L = Molecular ladder of size 100 bp