Literature DB >> 31660049

Skin barrier function in patients under radiation therapy due to the head and neck cancers - Preliminary study.

Jakub Pazdrowski1, Adriana Polaſska2, Joanna Kaźmierska3,4, Wojciech Barczak1,5, Mateusz Szewczyk1, Zygmunt Adamski6, Ryszard Żaba2, Paweſ Golusiſski1,7,8, Wojciech Golusiſski1, Aleksandra Daſczak-Pazdrowska6.   

Abstract

AIM: To present the possibility of non-invasive monitoring of the skin after radiotherapy in regards of epidermal barrier function.
BACKGROUND: Radiodermatitis constitutes 95% of all side effects in patients after radiotherapy. The proper assessment of the severity of radiodermatitis can be determined using semi-quantitative clinical scores [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE)].The most accepted way to analyze the epidermal barrier function is to determine Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In prospective study, we included 16 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy or concomitant chemoradiation in whom we performed non-invasive assessments of the skin barrier function, including TEWL measurement. The final analysis included 6 patients (4 treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, 2 with radical chemoradiation). Clinical assessment of irradiated skin was based on target lesion score (TLS) and CTCAE v 4.0.
RESULTS: The mean TLS score in the middle of irradiation was 1.6 points, after last irradiation it was 2.3 points; 3 months later the mean TLS score was: 0. CTCAE v 4.0 criteria: 2 patients had grade 0, 3 patients - grade 1; 1 patient - grade 2. There were statistically significant differences in TEWL related to irradiated skin in the following time intervals: before vs. in the middle; before vs. day after; in the middle vs. day after; in the middle vs. 3 months after; day after vs. 3 months after.
CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that radiotherapy causes skin barrier dysfunction in all patients independently of clinical radiodermatitis. The biophysical features of this dysfunction can precede clinical symptoms and they can be assessed by non-invasive and objective methods.
© 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Greater Poland Cancer Centre.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head neck; High frequency ultrasonography; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy; Squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31660049      PMCID: PMC6807069          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  10 in total

1.  The revised EEMCO guidance for the in vivo measurement of water in the skin.

Authors:  Enzo Berardesca; Marie Loden; Jorgen Serup; Philippe Masson; Luis Monteiro Rodrigues
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 2.  Ionizing radiation: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Julie L Ryan
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 3.  Radiation dermatitis: an overview.

Authors:  Fanni Hegedus; Laju M Mathew; Robert A Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.736

Review 4.  Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: etiologic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Valerie D Callender; Sharleen St Surin-Lord; Erica C Davis; Marissa Maclin
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 7.403

5.  Treatment of acute radiodermatitis with an oil-in-water emulsion following radiation therapy for breast cancer: a controlled, randomized trial.

Authors:  Jens-Michael Jensen; Tanja Gau; Jürgen Schultze; Gunter Lemmnitz; Regina Fölster-Holst; Theodor May; Christoph Abels; Ehrhardt Proksch
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Skin Barrier Function in Patients with Primary and Secondary Sjögren's Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna Olewicz-Gawlik; Adriana Polańska; Dorota Trzybulska; Michalina Nowak-Gabryel; Katarzyna Błochowiak; Jarosław Kocięcki; Jerzy Sokalski; Ryszard Żaba; Zygmunt Adamski; Aleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Journal:  Acta Dermatovenerol Croat       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.256

7.  Permeability barrier function of skin exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  M Schmuth; A Sztankay; G Weinlich; D M Linder; M A Wimmer; P O Fritsch; E Fritsch
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2001-08

8.  RTOG, CTCAE and WHO criteria for acute radiation dermatitis correlate with cutaneous blood flow measurements.

Authors:  Chih-Jen Huang; Ming-Feng Hou; Kuei-Hau Luo; Shu-Yi Wei; Ming-Yii Huang; Suh-Jen Su; Hung-Ying Kuo; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Gwo-Shing Chen; Stephen Chu-Sung Hu; Hung-Yi Chuang
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Increasing the rate of late toxicity by changing the score? A comparison of RTOG/EORTC and LENT/SOMA scores.

Authors:  Ulrike Hoeller; Silke Tribius; Antje Kuhlmey; Kai Grader; Fabian Fehlauer; Winfried Alberti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature.

Authors:  Frank Haubner; Elisabeth Ohmann; Fabian Pohl; Jürgen Strutz; Holger G Gassner
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.