Literature DB >> 25777626

RTOG, CTCAE and WHO criteria for acute radiation dermatitis correlate with cutaneous blood flow measurements.

Chih-Jen Huang1, Ming-Feng Hou2, Kuei-Hau Luo3, Shu-Yi Wei4, Ming-Yii Huang1, Suh-Jen Su5, Hung-Ying Kuo5, Shyng-Shiou F Yuan6, Gwo-Shing Chen7, Stephen Chu-Sung Hu8, Hung-Yi Chuang9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various clinician-assessed scoring criteria have been used to grade acute radiation dermatitis. However, it is not known whether these scoring criteria correlate with changes in objective skin biophysical parameters and patient-reported symptoms following radiotherapy. We seek to correlate three different clinician-assessed scoring criteria with skin biophysical changes and patient-reported symptoms in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in a university hospital medical center. The severity of acute radiation dermatitis in 101 breast cancer patients was graded using the RTOG, CTCAE and WHO clinical scoring criteria. We also measured various skin biophysical parameters (skin blood flow, pigmentation, hydration, and pH) by non-invasive techniques before and after radiotherapy. Patient-reported breast symptoms (pain, itching, local heat, and tightness) were evaluated using a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The three different clinician-assessed scoring criteria correlated most strongly with changes in cutaneous blood flow following radiotherapy for breast cancer (correlation coefficient 0.70 for RTOG, 0.68 for CTCAE, and 0.50 for WHO). All three scoring criteria also showed moderate correlation with changes in skin pigmentation (correlation coefficients 0.4-0.5), but showed no significant correlation with skin hydration or pH (correlation coefficients <0.2). The scoring criteria correlated poorly with patient-reported breast symptoms (correlation coefficients <0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: The three clinician-assessed scoring criteria (especially the RTOG and CTCAE criteria) show strong correlation with cutaneous blood flow measurements, but correlate less well with other skin biophysical parameters and patient-reported symptoms.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Microcirculation; Patient outcome assessment; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy; Skin pigmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25777626     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  18 in total

1.  Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: A systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Tara Behroozian; Lauren T Milton; Neil H Shear; Erin McKenzie; Yasmeen Razvi; Irene Karam; Kucy Pon; Henry Lam; Emily Lam; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Reducing Radiation Dermatitis Using a Film-forming Silicone Gel During Breast Radiotherapy: A Pilot Randomized-controlled Trial.

Authors:  Songmi Ahn; Kihoon Sung; Hyun Ju Kim; Young Eun Choi; Young Kyu Lee; Jeong Soo Kim; Seul Ki Lee; Joo-Young Roh
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Samuel Finkelstein; Lauren Kanee; Tara Behroozian; Julie Ryan Wolf; Corina van den Hurk; Edward Chow; Pierluigi Bonomo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Lack of Prophylactic Effects of Aloe Vera Gel on Radiation Induced Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients

Authors:  Niloofar Ahmadloo; Behnam Kadkhodaei; Shapour Omidvari; Ahmad Mosalaei; Mansour Ansari; Hamid Nasrollahi; Sayed Hasan Hamedi; Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Comparison of radiation dermatitis between hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy: objective, longitudinal assessment of skin color.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Tadashi Takenaka; Norihiro Aibe; Gen Suzuki; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura; Koji Masui; Takuya Kimoto; Naomi Sasaki; Tsuyoshi Nishimura; Akihiro Nakashima; Mariko Goto; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Is there agreement between evaluators that used two scoring systems to measure acute radiation dermatitis?

Authors:  Marceila de Andrade Fuzissaki; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Thais de Oliveira Gozzo; Marcelo de Almeida Maia; Paula Philbert Lajolo Canto; Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Skin barrier function in patients under radiation therapy due to the head and neck cancers - Preliminary study.

Authors:  Jakub Pazdrowski; Adriana Polaſska; Joanna Kaźmierska; Wojciech Barczak; Mateusz Szewczyk; Zygmunt Adamski; Ryszard Żaba; Paweſ Golusiſski; Wojciech Golusiſski; Aleksandra Daſczak-Pazdrowska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Management of Acute Radiodermatitis in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Patients Using Electrospun Nanofibrous Patches Loaded with Pinus halepensis Bark Extract.

Authors:  Aikaterini Kyritsi; Stefanos Kikionis; Anna Tagka; Nikolaos Koliarakis; Antonia Evangelatou; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Alexandros Stratigos; Vangelis Karalis; Paraskevas Dallas; Andreas Vitsos; Efstathia Ioannou; Vassilios Roussis; Michail Rallis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  High-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy for paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome.

Authors:  Sun-Young Lee; Jong-Hyun Kim; Dong-Hyu Cho
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy reduces severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity during radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jang-Chun Lin; Jo-Ting Tsai; Yu-Ching Chou; Ming-Hsien Li; Wei-Hsiu Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.