Literature DB >> 31659502

Cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy for T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota's fascia.

Atsushi Ogura1, Ryutaro Kobayashi2, Satoru Kawai2, Kenji Takagi2, Kiyotaka Kawai2, Takashi Maeda2, Tsukasa Aritake2, Natsuki Nagano2, Satoaki Kamiya2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy for T4 colorectal cancer remain controversial. We believe that setting a "Goal" that will guide the surgeons in returning from the deep layer could be the key to safe en bloc resection of neighboring organs. For descending colon cancer, the cranial-first approach makes it possible to clearly visualize the pancreas and origin of the transverse mesocolon, leading to safe splenic flexure mobilization and complete mesocolic excision, which is the strongest advantage of this approach. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota's fascia. We performed laparoscopic left colectomy using the cranial-first approach to set a "Goal" at the inferior border of the pancreas for safe resection of the Gerota's fascia. The total operative time was 233 min, and the estimated blood loss was 98 ml. She was discharged after surgery without postoperative complications. Pathological findings revealed the invasion into the Gerota's fascia, and the resection margin was negative for cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy appears to be safe and feasible and could be a promising method for selected patients with T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota's fascia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial-first approach; Left colectomy; T4 colon cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659502      PMCID: PMC6816766          DOI: 10.1186/s40792-019-0720-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2198-7793


Background

Laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colon cancer is technically demanding owing to the complicated anatomy around the pancreas and transverse mesocolon [1]. For complete mesocolic excision (CME), dissection of the transverse mesocolon is necessary in the proximity of the pancreas. However, the thick mesocolon often prevents surgeons from detecting the pancreas, resulting in pancreatic injury or incomplete CME. For left-sided colon cancer, the cranial-first approach is one of the promising procedures for obtaining better surgical outcomes; it has been reported previously [2]. This approach involves dissection of the superior layer of the mesocolon and transverse mesocolon at the posterior border of the pancreas cranially; this makes it possible to clearly visualize the pancreas and origin of the transverse mesocolon, leading to safe splenic flexure mobilization and CME, which is the strongest advantage of this approach. For T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia, dissection of the Gerota’s fascia is needed to obtain a sufficient surgical margin. The plane between the Gerota’s fascia and left kidney, which leads to the posterior layer of the pancreas, is relatively easy to detect. However, using the medial approach, it is difficult to return from this layer to the superior layer of the mesocolon because the thick Gerota’s fascia envelops the pancreas. The cranial-first approach would make it easier to detect the optimal layer in the medial approach, avoiding pancreatic injury and achieving CME. Herein, we report the first case of cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy for T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia.

Case presentation

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report, and her anonymity has been protected. A 75-year-old woman presenting with diarrhea was referred to our hospital. Colonoscopy showed a circumferential type II tumor located at the descending colon at the anal side of the splenic flexure. Histopathological examination revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) showed a 60 × 60-mm tumor located at the descending colon, invading the Gerota’s fascia (Fig. 1). Some swollen lymph nodes were detected along the left colic artery (LCA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). No distant metastases were seen. Preoperative diagnosis was cT4bN1bM0 stage IIIC locally advanced descending colon cancer. We planned to perform laparoscopic left colectomy with en bloc resection of the Gerota’s fascia.
Fig. 1

Colonoscopy and computed tomography: circumferential T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia (arrow head) at the anal side of the splenic flexure

Colonoscopy and computed tomography: circumferential T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia (arrow head) at the anal side of the splenic flexure The patient was placed in the lithotomy position under general and epidural anesthesia. The following ports were placed: a 12-mm port at the umbilicus for a scope and 5-mm ports at each quadrant. A fist-size tumor covered with the omentum was detected at the anal side of the splenic flexure. No peritoneal metastasis was observed: Cranial approach to set a “Goal” for the medial approach First, the omental bursa was opened widely, and the adhesion between the transverse mesocolon and gastric posterior wall was dissected to visualize the pancreatic outline. The superior lobe and the fat of the transverse mesocolon were dissected in the proximity of the pancreas, and the posterior lobe of the transverse mesocolon was exposed cranially (Fig. 2). The gauze was placed on this layer, which was a “Goal” for the medial approach.
Fig. 2

Laparoscopic cranial view of setting a “Goal” at the inferior border of pancreas and medial view of the resection of the Gerota’s fascia

Mobilization of the left-sided colon and dissection of the regional nodes The sigmoid colon was mobilized in a caudal-to-cranial direction. After preserving the retroperitoneal tissue, including the hypogastric nerve plexus, ureter, and gonadal vessels, we exposed the root of the IMA clearly and dissected the swollen nodes along the IMA. The LCA was clipped and divided at the origin. Following this, the lateral attachment was dissected, and the descending colon was laterally mobilized to the splenic flexure. Medial approach for safe resection of the Gerota’s fascia For obtaining a sufficient surgical margin, we dissected the Gerota’s fascia and exposed the surface of the left kidney just behind the tumor. At the most medial side of the mesocolon behind the IMV, we could easily detect the layer between the posterior lobe of the mesocolon and Gerota’s fascia; we cut the posterior lobe above the gauze that was placed as the “Goal” during the cranial approach. Finally, we cut the thick tissue, including the Gerota’s fascia and transverse mesocolon, just above the gauze (Fig. 2). Laparoscopic cranial view of setting a “Goal” at the inferior border of pancreas and medial view of the resection of the Gerota’s fascia The mobilized left-sided colon was extracted through a trans-umbilical wound and dissected with sufficient proximal and distal margins. Functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed using linear staplers. The total operative time was 233 min, and the estimated total blood loss was 98 ml. She was discharged on the 14th day after surgery without postoperative complications. Pathological findings revealed the invasion into the Gerota’s fascia, and the resection margin was negative for cancer (Fig. 3). The number of dissected lymph nodes was 18; however, no metastasis was observed. We assumed that the preoperative CT finding of lymphadenopathy was due to inflammation induced by the tumor. The pathological diagnosis was pT4bN0M0 pStage IIC.
Fig. 3

Resected specimens

Resected specimens

Discussion

This is the first case of cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy for T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia. Previous studies have reported some advantages of laparoscopic surgery: good visualization, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain after colorectal cancer surgery [3-7]. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for T4 colorectal cancer remain controversial [3, 8–10]. In terms of extended surgery for T4 colorectal cancer adhering to or invading neighboring organs, it would be more difficult to return from the deep layer to the shallow layer. Setting a “Goal” using a multidirectional approach of laparoscopic surgery can be the key to safe resection and can help minimize perioperative complications in patients with T4 colorectal cancer. For T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia, dissection of the Gerota’s fascia behind the tumor is necessary for obtaining sufficient surgical margins. As shown in Fig. 4, the layer between the Gerota’s fascia and kidney is located below the pancreas. In the final part of the medial approach, the thick Gerota’s fascia and mesocolon backed by the pancreas often make dissection difficult due to the risk of pancreatic injury. The cranial-first approach, which we have reported previously, is a promising method for performing safe laparoscopic surgery with splenic flexure mobilization. Using this method of setting a “Goal” for the medial approach, we could easily achieve CME without pancreatic injury (Fig. 4). Owing to the complexity of distinguishing the layer to be dissected, this technique should be performed by laparoscopic surgeons with extensive experience in advanced colorectal cancer surgery.
Fig. 4

Scheme of cranial-first approach

Scheme of cranial-first approach

Conclusions

The cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy appears to be safe and feasible and could be a promising method for selected patients with T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia.
  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer.

Authors:  Tomoaki Aoki; Takeru Matsuda; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Kimihiro Yamashita; Yasuo Sumi; Ryo Ishida; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Taro Oshikiri; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Cranial-first approach for laparoscopic surgery with splenic flexure mobilization.

Authors:  A Ogura; R Kobayashi; T Aritake; T Maeda; K Kawai; K Takagi; S Kawai; S Kamiya
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adina E Feinberg; Tyler R Chesney; Sergio A Acuna; Tarik Sammour; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Masashi Ueno; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Byung Ho Nam; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Taek-Gu Lee; Dae Yong Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Hye-Seung Lee; Sun Young Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Jee Hyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.

Authors:  Peter J Hewett; Randall A Allardyce; Philip F Bagshaw; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Jacqueline H Stephens; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamanashi; Takatoshi Nakamura; Takeo Sato; Masanori Naito; Hirohisa Miura; Atsuko Tsutsui; Masashi Shimazu; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Transitional impact of short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Tomonori Akagi; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Shuji Saito; Yusuke Kinugasa; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Takeo Sato; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.