Liang Sun1,2, Xinyu Li3, Jun Pan1, Jiashun Mao1, Yueyang Yuan1,4, Duoxi Wang1, Weiwei Sun5, Gerhard R F Krueger6, Guanyu Wang7,2,4,8. 1. Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, P.R. China. 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cell Microenvironment and Disease Research, Shenzhen, P.R. China. 3. School of Life and Health Sciences and Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, P.R. China. 4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Science and Material Design, Shenzhen, P.R. China. 5. Department of Pathology, Shanghai Songjiang Central Hospital, Shanghai, P.R. China swwmmm@163.com Gerhard.Krueger@uth.tmc.edu wanggy@sustech.edu.cn. 6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, U.S.A. swwmmm@163.com Gerhard.Krueger@uth.tmc.edu wanggy@sustech.edu.cn. 7. Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, P.R. China swwmmm@163.com Gerhard.Krueger@uth.tmc.edu wanggy@sustech.edu.cn. 8. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Cell Microenvironment, Shenzhen, P.R. China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperactivity of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is implicated in a variety of diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Treatment may benefit from effective mTORC1 inhibition, which can be achieved by preventing arginine from disrupting the cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 (CASTOR1)-GTPase-activating proteins toward RAGS subcomplex 2 (GATOR2) complex through binding with CASTOR1. An attractive idea is to determine analogues of arginine that are as competent as arginine in binding with CASTOR1, but without disrupting the CASTOR1-GATOR2 interaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for binding of arginine analogues with CASTOR1 and binding free energy, hydrogen bond formation, and root mean squared deviation and root mean square fluctuation kinetics were then calculated. RESULTS: The binding free energy calculations revealed that Nα-acetyl-arginine, citrulline, and norarginine have sufficient binding affinity with CASTOR1 to compete with arginine. The hydrogen bond analysis revealed that norarginine, Nα-acetyl-arginine and D-arginine have proficient H-bonds that can facilitate their entering the narrow binding pocket. CONCLUSION: Norarginine and Nα-acetyl-arginine are the top drug candidates for mTORC1 inhibition, with Nα-acetyl-arginine being the best choice. Copyright
BACKGROUND: Hyperactivity of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is implicated in a variety of diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Treatment may benefit from effective mTORC1 inhibition, which can be achieved by preventing arginine from disrupting the cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 (CASTOR1)-GTPase-activating proteins toward RAGS subcomplex 2 (GATOR2) complex through binding with CASTOR1. An attractive idea is to determine analogues of arginine that are as competent as arginine in binding with CASTOR1, but without disrupting the CASTOR1-GATOR2 interaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for binding of arginine analogues with CASTOR1 and binding free energy, hydrogen bond formation, and root mean squared deviation and root mean square fluctuation kinetics were then calculated. RESULTS: The binding free energy calculations revealed that Nα-acetyl-arginine, citrulline, and norarginine have sufficient binding affinity with CASTOR1 to compete with arginine. The hydrogen bond analysis revealed that norarginine, Nα-acetyl-arginine and D-arginine have proficient H-bonds that can facilitate their entering the narrow binding pocket. CONCLUSION: Norarginine and Nα-acetyl-arginine are the top drug candidates for mTORC1 inhibition, with Nα-acetyl-arginine being the best choice. Copyright
Authors: Yasemin Sancak; Timothy R Peterson; Yoav D Shaul; Robert A Lindquist; Carson C Thoreen; Liron Bar-Peled; David M Sabatini Journal: Science Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Robert A Saxton; Lynne Chantranupong; Kevin E Knockenhauer; Thomas U Schwartz; David M Sabatini Journal: Nature Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 49.962