Literature DB >> 31658359

Template for the description of cell-based toxicological test methods to allow evaluation and regulatory use of the data.

Alice Krebs1,2, Tanja Waldmann1, Martin F Wilks3, Barbara M A Van Vugt-Lussenburg4, Bart Van der Burg4, Andrea Terron5, Thomas Steger-Hartmann6, Joelle Ruegg7, Costanza Rovida8, Emma Pedersen9, Giorgia Pallocca1,8, Mirjam Luijten10, Sofia B Leite11, Stefan Kustermann12, Hennicke Kamp13, Julia Hoeng14, Philip Hewitt15, Matthias Herzler16, Jan G Hengstler17, Tuula Heinonen18, Thomas Hartung8,19, Barry Hardy20, Florian Gantner21, Ellen Fritsche22, Kristina Fant9, Janine Ezendam10, Thomas Exner20, Torsten Dunkern23, Daniel R Dietrich24, Sandra Coecke11, Francois Busquet8,25, Albert Braeuning26, Olesja Bondarenko27, Susanne H Bennekou28, Mario Beilmann29, Marcel Leist1,2,8.   

Abstract

Only few cell-based test methods are described by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines or other regulatory references (e.g., the European Pharmacopoeia). The majority of toxicity tests still falls into the category of non-guideline methods. Data from these tests may nevertheless be used to support regulatory decisions or to guide strategies to assess compounds (e.g., drugs, agrochemicals) during research and development if they fulfill basic requirements concerning their relevance, reproducibility and predictivity. Only a method description of sufficient clarity and detail allows interpretation and use of the data. To guide regulators faced with increasing amounts of data from non-guideline studies, the OECD formulated Guidance Document 211 (GD211) on method documentation for the purpose of safety assessment. As GD211 is targeted mainly at regulators, it leaves scientists less familiar with regulation uncertain as to what level of detail is required and how individual questions should be answered. Moreover, little attention was given to the description of the test system (i.e., cell culture) and the steps leading to it being established in the guidance. To address these issues, an annotated toxicity test method template (ToxTemp) was developed (i) to fulfill all requirements of GD211, (ii) to guide the user concerning the types of answers and detail of information required, (iii) to include acceptance criteria for test elements, and (iv) to define the cells sufficiently and transparently. The fully annotated ToxTemp is provided here, together with reference to a database containing exemplary descriptions of more than 20 cell-based tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31658359     DOI: 10.14573/altex.1909271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  12 in total

1.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  Microphysiological Systems Evaluation: Experience of TEX-VAL Tissue Chip Testing Consortium.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Courtney Sakolish; Yuki Kato; Clifford Stephan; Leoncio Vergara; Philip Hewitt; Vasanthi Bhaskaran; Myrtle Davis; Rhiannon N Hardwick; Stephen S Ferguson; Jason P Stanko; Piyush Bajaj; Karissa Adkins; Nisha S Sipes; E Sidney Hunter; Maria T Baltazar; Paul L Carmichael; Kritika Sadh; Richard A Becker
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.109

3.  Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Emilio Benfenati; Francesca Caloni; P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera; Christophe Chesné; Mark T D Cronin; Joop De Knecht; Daniel R Dietrich; Sylvia E Escher; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Brenna Flannery; Matthias Herzler; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Bruno Hubesch; Hennicke Kamp; Jaffar Kisitu; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Simona Kovarich; Marcel Leist; Alexandra Maertens; Kerry Nugent; Giorgia Pallocca; Manuel Pastor; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Octavio Presgrave; Lena Smirnova; Michael Schwarz; Takashi Yamada; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.250

4.  The ENDpoiNTs Project: Novel Testing Strategies for Endocrine Disruptors Linked to Developmental Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Diana Lupu; Patrik Andersson; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; Barbara Demeneix; Ellen Fritsche; Chris Gennings; Walter Lichtensteiger; Marcel Leist; Pim E G Leonards; Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Martin Scholze; Giuseppe Testa; Jesus A F Tresguerres; Remco H S Westerink; Bernard Zalc; Joëlle Rüegg
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

Authors:  Alice Krebs; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; Tanja Waldmann; Wiebke Albrecht; Jan Boei; Bas Ter Braak; Maja Brajnik; Thomas Braunbeck; Tim Brecklinghaus; Francois Busquet; Andras Dinnyes; Joh Dokler; Xenia Dolde; Thomas E Exner; Ciarán Fisher; David Fluri; Anna Forsby; Jan G Hengstler; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Zofia Janstova; Paul Jennings; Jaffar Kisitu; Julianna Kobolak; Manoj Kumar; Alice Limonciel; Jessica Lundqvist; Balázs Mihalik; Wolfgang Moritz; Giorgia Pallocca; Andrea Paola Cediel Ulloa; Manuel Pastor; Costanza Rovida; Ugis Sarkans; Johannes P Schimming; Bela Z Schmidt; Regina Stöber; Tobias Strassfeld; Bob van de Water; Anja Wilmes; Bart van der Burg; Catherine M Verfaillie; Rebecca von Hellfeld; Harry Vrieling; Nanette G Vrijenhoek; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  In Vitro Research Reproducibility: Keeping Up High Standards.

Authors:  Cordula Hirsch; Stefan Schildknecht
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Setting the stage for next-generation risk assessment with non-animal approaches: the EU-ToxRisk project experience.

Authors:  M J Moné; G Pallocca; S E Escher; T Exner; M Herzler; S Hougaard Bennekou; H Kamp; E D Kroese; Marcel Leist; T Steger-Hartmann; B van de Water
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Paving the way for application of next generation risk assessment to safety decision-making for cosmetic ingredients.

Authors:  M P Dent; E Vaillancourt; R S Thomas; P L Carmichael; G Ouedraogo; H Kojima; J Barroso; J Ansell; T S Barton-Maclaren; S H Bennekou; K Boekelheide; J Ezendam; J Field; S Fitzpatrick; M Hatao; R Kreiling; M Lorencini; C Mahony; B Montemayor; R Mazaro-Costa; J Oliveira; V Rogiers; D Smegal; R Taalman; Y Tokura; R Verma; C Willett; C Yang
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Regulatory Testing for Endocrine Disruptors; Need for Validated Methods and Integrated Approaches.

Authors:  Elise Grignard; Kelly de Jesus; Philippe Hubert
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-19

10.  Towards a qAOP framework for predictive toxicology - Linking data to decisions.

Authors:  Alicia Paini; Ivana Campia; Mark T D Cronin; David Asturiol; Lidia Ceriani; Thomas E Exner; Wang Gao; Caroline Gomes; Johannes Kruisselbrink; Marvin Martens; M E Bette Meek; David Pamies; Julia Pletz; Stefan Scholz; Andreas Schüttler; Nicoleta Spînu; Daniel L Villeneuve; Clemens Wittwehr; Andrew Worth; Mirjam Luijten
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.