Literature DB >> 31658016

Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Ahmet Karakeçi1, Taner Cüneyt Eftal2, Ahmet Keleş3, Ceren Gölbaşı2, Rahmi Onur4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction rates in women treated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using the adjustable anchored single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS) and standard midurethral sling (MUS) procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 113 women between October 2012 and October 2016 underwent either the adjustable SIMS (n=54) or MUS (n=57) procedure. The postoperative pain profile was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale at the fixed time-point quality of life and an additional postoperative 3rd week appointment. We asked our patients the following two questions to evaluate their satisfaction with surgery and their preference: "Would you have this kind of surgery again?" (Q1), and "Would you recommend this type of surgery to another patient with same symptoms?" (Q2). For the evaluation of patient complaints, the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) were used before and after the procedure.
RESULTS: Women in the SIMS group had a significantly lower postoperative pain profile for up to 3 weeks (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications and postoperative continence rates between the groups. With regard to Q1 and Q2, a significant difference was found between the groups (p=0.003 and p=0.002, respectively). While the questionnaire scores of the IIQ-7 and UDI-6 were also significantly improved at postoperative evaluations (p<0.001), there was no significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: SIMS is associated with a significantly improved postoperative pain profile and earlier return to work when compared to MUS.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31658016      PMCID: PMC6944422          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.19105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  29 in total

1.  Surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence: what is the gold-standard procedure?

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Stefano Salvatore; Stefano Uccella; Walter Artibani; Giacomo Novara; Linda Cardozo; PierFrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06

Review 2.  Prevention, diagnosis, and management of midurethral mesh sling complications.

Authors:  A Ross Hengel; Kevin V Carlson; Richard J Baverstock
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Single-Incision Mini-Slings: Obturator Complex Pull-Out-Force Measurements.

Authors:  Florian Lenz; Sara Doll; Christof Sohn; Kerstin A Brocker
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Long-term outcomes and quality of life effects of single incision mini sling procedure in stress urinary incontinence patients.

Authors:  Ceren Golbasi; Cuneyt Eftal Taner; Hakan Golbasi
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.

Authors:  Annetta M Madsen; Sherif A El-Nashar; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  A comparison between adjustable single-incision sling and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in treating stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Xing Xin; Yue Song; Zhijun Xia
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  U Ulmsten; P Petros
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995-03

9.  Multicenter prospective randomized study of single-incision mini-sling vs tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in management of female stress urinary incontinence: a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alyaa Mostafa; Wael Agur; Mohamed Abdel-All; Karen Guerrero; Chu Lim; Mohamed Allam; Mohamed Yousef; James N'Dow; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Evaluation of the efficacy of transobturator tape surgery in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence using urodynamics and questionnaires.

Authors:  Cihan Aygül; Ramazan Özyurt; Bulat Aytek Şık; Serkan Kumbasar
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.