Literature DB >> 31657982

Validation of the DNA Damage Immune Response Signature in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the SWOG 9313c Trial.

Priyanka Sharma1, William E Barlow2, Andrew K Godwin3, Eileen E Parkes4, Laura A Knight4,5, Steven M Walker4,5, Richard D Kennedy4,5, Denis P Harkin4,5, Gemma E Logan5, Christopher J Steele5, Shauna M Lambe5, Sunil Badve6, Yesim Gökmen-Polar6, Harsh B Pathak3, Kamilla Isakova3, Hannah M Linden7,8, Peggy Porter8, Lajos Pusztai9, Alastair M Thompson10, Debu Tripathy11, Gabriel N Hortobagyi11, Daniel F Hayes12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To independently validate two biomarkers, a 44-gene DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), as prognostic markers in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in SWOG 9313.
METHODS: Four hundred twenty-five centrally determined patient cases with TNBC from S9313 were identified. DDIR signature was performed on RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, and samples were classified as DDIR negative or positive using predefined cutoffs. Evaluation of sTILs was performed as described previously. Markers were tested for prognostic value for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment assignment, nodal status, and tumor size.
RESULTS: Among 425 patients with TNBC, 33% were node positive. DDIR was tested successfully in 90% of patients (381 of 425), 62% of which were DDIR signature positive. DDIR signature positivity was associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92; P = .015) and OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89; P = .010). sTILs density assessment was available in 99% of patients and was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P = .026 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%) and OS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85; P = .004 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%). DDIR signature score and sTILs density were moderately correlated (r = 0.60), which precluded statistical significance for DFS in a joint model. Three-year DFS and OS in a subgroup of patients with DDIR positivity and T1c/T2N0 disease were 88% and 94%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The prognostic role of sTILs and DDIR in early-stage TNBC was confirmed. DDIR signature conferred improved prognosis in two thirds of patients with TNBC treated with adjuvant AC. DDIR signature has the potential to stratify outcome and to identify patients with less projected benefit after AC chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31657982      PMCID: PMC7194448          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Prognosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Analysis of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Sherene Loi; Damien Drubay; Sylvia Adams; Giancarlo Pruneri; Prudence A Francis; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Heikki Joensuu; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Sunil Badve; Sandra Demaria; Robert Gray; Elisabetta Munzone; Jerome Lemonnier; Christos Sotiriou; Martine J Piccart; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Andrea Vingiani; Kathryn Gray; Fabrice Andre; Carsten Denkert; Roberto Salgado; Stefan Michiels
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Molin Wang; Silvana Martino; Vicky Jones; Edith A Perez; Tom Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; George W Sledge; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Activation of STING-Dependent Innate Immune Signaling By S-Phase-Specific DNA Damage in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eileen E Parkes; Steven M Walker; Laura E Taggart; Nuala McCabe; Laura A Knight; Richard Wilkinson; Karen D McCloskey; Niamh E Buckley; Kienan I Savage; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Stephen McQuaid; Mary T Harte; Paul B Mullan; D Paul Harkin; Richard D Kennedy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams; Robert J Gray; Sandra Demaria; Lori Goldstein; Edith A Perez; Lawrence N Shulman; Silvana Martino; Molin Wang; Vicky E Jones; Thomas J Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers.

Authors:  E H Lips; L Mulder; A Oonk; L E van der Kolk; F B L Hogervorst; A L T Imholz; J Wesseling; S Rodenhuis; P M Nederlof
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Identification and validation of an anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy response assay in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jude M Mulligan; Laura A Hill; Steve Deharo; Gareth Irwin; David Boyle; Katherine E Keating; Olaide Y Raji; Fionnuala A McDyer; Eamonn O'Brien; Max Bylesjo; Jennifer E Quinn; Noralane M Lindor; Paul B Mullan; Colin R James; Steven M Walker; Peter Kerr; Jacqueline James; Timothy S Davison; Vitali Proutski; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Patrick G Johnston; Fergus J Couch; D Paul Harkin; Richard D Kennedy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Bryan Ngo; Ashley M Laughney; Julie-Ann Cavallo; Charles J Murphy; Peter Ly; Pragya Shah; Roshan K Sriram; Thomas B K Watkins; Neil K Taunk; Mercedes Duran; Chantal Pauli; Christine Shaw; Kalyani Chadalavada; Vinagolu K Rajasekhar; Giulio Genovese; Subramanian Venkatesan; Nicolai J Birkbak; Nicholas McGranahan; Mark Lundquist; Quincey LaPlant; John H Healey; Olivier Elemento; Christine H Chung; Nancy Y Lee; Marcin Imielenski; Gouri Nanjangud; Dana Pe'er; Don W Cleveland; Simon N Powell; Jan Lammerding; Charles Swanton; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The BRCA1ness signature is associated significantly with response to PARP inhibitor treatment versus control in the I-SPY 2 randomized neoadjuvant setting.

Authors:  Tesa M Severson; Denise M Wolf; Christina Yau; Justine Peeters; Diederik Wehkam; Philip C Schouten; Suet-Feung Chin; Ian J Majewski; Magali Michaut; Astrid Bosma; Bernard Pereira; Tycho Bismeijer; Lodewyk Wessels; Carlos Caldas; René Bernards; Iris M Simon; Annuska M Glas; Sabine Linn; Laura van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  15 in total

1.  Predictive Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with Nab-Paclitaxel and Dose-Dense Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kim R M Blenman; Michal Marczyk; Thomas Karn; Tao Qing; Xiaotong Li; Vignesh Gunasekharan; Vesal Yaghoobi; Yalai Bai; Eiman Y Ibrahim; Tristen Park; Andrea Silber; Denise M Wolf; Emily Reisenbichler; Carsten Denkert; Bruno V Sinn; Mariya Rozenblit; Julia Foldi; David L Rimm; Sibylle Loibl; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 2.  Practical classification of triple-negative breast cancer: intratumoral heterogeneity, mechanisms of drug resistance, and novel therapies.

Authors:  Antonio Marra; Dario Trapani; Giulia Viale; Carmen Criscitiello; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 3.  Optimizing Radiation Therapy to Boost Systemic Immune Responses in Breast Cancer: A Critical Review for Breast Radiation Oncologists.

Authors:  Alice Y Ho; Jean L Wright; Rachel C Blitzblau; Robert W Mutter; Dan G Duda; Larry Norton; Aditya Bardia; Laura Spring; Steven J Isakoff; Jonathan H Chen; Clemens Grassberger; Jennifer R Bellon; Sushil Beriwal; Atif J Khan; Corey Speers; Samantha A Dunn; Alastair Thompson; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Ian E Krop; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  RNA-sequencing and microarray data mining revealing: the aberrantly expressed mRNAs were related with a poor outcome in the triple negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hongjun Fei; Songchang Chen; Chenming Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  Identifying Biomarkers to Pair with Targeting Treatments within Triple Negative Breast Cancer for Improved Patient Stratification.

Authors:  Holly Tovey; Maggie Chon U Cheang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Protein disulfide isomerase A1‑associated pathways in the development of stratified breast cancer therapies.

Authors:  Emyr Yosef Bakker; Masayuki Fujii; Marija Krstic-Demonacos; Constantinos Demonacos; Rashed Alhammad
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Randomized Phase II Trial of Anthracycline-free and Anthracycline-containing Neoadjuvant Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer (NeoSTOP).

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Bruce F Kimler; Anne O'Dea; Lauren Nye; Yen Y Wang; Rachel Yoder; Joshua M Staley; Lindsey Prochaska; Jamie Wagner; Amanda L Amin; Kelsey Larson; Christa Balanoff; Manana Elia; Gregory Crane; Sheshadri Madhusudhana; Marc Hoffmann; Maureen Sheehan; Roberto Rodriguez; Karissa Finke; Rajvi Shah; Deepti Satelli; Anuj Shrestha; Larry Beck; Richard McKittrick; Robert Pluenneke; Vinay Raja; Venkatadri Beeki; Larry Corum; Jaimie Heldstab; Stephanie LaFaver; Micki Prager; Milind Phadnis; Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam; Roy A Jensen; Andrew K Godwin; Roberto Salgado; Kathan Mehta; Qamar Khan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 8.  Prognostic Cancer Gene Expression Signatures: Current Status and Challenges.

Authors:  Yuquan Qian; Jimmy Daza; Timo Itzel; Johannes Betge; Tianzuo Zhan; Frederik Marmé; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Eileen E Parkes; Kienan I Savage; Tong Lioe; Clinton Boyd; Sophia Halliday; Steven M Walker; Keith Lowry; Laura Knight; Niamh E Buckley; Andrena Grogan; Gemma E Logan; Alison Clayton; Jane Hurwitz; Stephen J Kirk; Jiamei Xu; Fatima Abdullahi Sidi; Matthew P Humphries; Victoria Bingham; Jaqueline A James; Colin R James; D Paul Harkin; Richard D Kennedy; Stuart A McIntosh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Systemic immune reaction in axillary lymph nodes adds to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Thomas Hardiman; Kailiang Wu; Jelmar Quist; Patrycja Gazinska; Tony Ng; Arnie Purushotham; Roberto Salgado; Xiaojing Guo; Sarah E Pinder; Anita Grigoriadis
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.