Literature DB >> 31656987

What are the economic burden and costs associated with the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema? A systematic review.

Tessa De Vrieze1,2, Ines Nevelsteen3, Sarah Thomis4, An De Groef5, Wiebren A A Tjalma6,7,8, Nick Gebruers9,8, Nele Devoogdt5,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of costs associated with the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) and its possible sequelae, borne by patients or by society. DATA SOURCES: According to the PRISMA guideline, a systematic literature search was carried out in four electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Clinical Trials and EMBASE. Searches were performed on October 1, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria: (1) expenses of adults (age > 18 years), (2) concerning patients with BCRL, (3) overview of (in)direct costs associated with BCRL, (4) expenses in which at least one type of conservative treatment modality for lymphoedema is included and/or costs for hospital admissions due to infections. Reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: After assessing the risk of bias and level of evidence, quantitative data on (in)direct costs for BCRL treatment during a well-mentioned timeframe were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight studies were included. Three studies reported on patient-borne costs related to BCRL. Mean direct costs per year borne by patients ranged between USD$2306 and USD$2574. Indirect costs borne by patients ranged between USD$3325 and USD$5545 per year. Five studies estimated society-borne costs related to BCRL from claims data, billing prices and providers' services during 12 to 24 months of follow-up. Mean direct treatment costs after 1 year of decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT) ranged between €799 (= USD$1126.60) and USD$3165.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review revealed that BCRL imposes a substantial economic burden on patients and society. However, more standardized high-quality health economic analyses among this field are required. Recent economic analyses related to BCRL treatment in Europe, Asia, Africa and South America are lacking. Worldwide, further scrutiny of the economic impact of DLT for BCRL in clinical settings is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The review makes part of a double-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (EFforT-BCRL trial), which is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02609724). CME reference S58689, EudraCT Number 2015-004822-33.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast neoplasms; Costs and cost analysis; Healthcare costs; Lymphedema

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656987     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05101-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  11 in total

1.  Breast cancer-related lymphedema and its treatment: how big is the financial impact?

Authors:  Tessa De Vrieze; Nick Gebruers; Ines Nevelsteen; Wiebren A A Tjalma; Sarah Thomis; An De Groef; Lore Dams; Vincent Haenen; Nele Devoogdt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Research on the Economics of Cancer-Related Health Care: An Overview of the Review Literature.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Kaitlin Akif; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Prediction of breast cancer-related lymphedema by dermal backflow detected with near-infrared fluorescence lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Melissa B Aldrich; John C Rasmussen; Sarah M DeSnyder; Wendy A Woodward; Wenyaw Chan; Eva M Sevick-Muraca; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Benjamin D Smith; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Karen E Hoffman; Melissa P Mitchell; Carlos H Barcenas; Lynn E Isales; Simona F Shaitelman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 4.  Effectiveness of mobile health-based self-management interventions in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xia Luo; Yuzhen Chen; Jing Chen; Yue Zhang; Mingfang Li; Chenxia Xiong; Jun Yan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Effects of weight reduction on the breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chi-Lin Tsai; Wei-Wen Chang
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 6.  Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge of Lymphedema.

Authors:  Hossein Yarmohammadi; Amirhossein Rooddehghan; Masood Soltanipur; Amirabbas Sarafraz; Seyed Fatah Mahdavi Anari
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2021-12-31

7.  Self-reported arm and shoulder problems in breast cancer survivors in Sub-Saharan Africa: the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes cohort study.

Authors:  Pauline Boucheron; Angelica Anele; Annelle Zietsman; Moses Galukande; Groesbeck Parham; Leeya F Pinder; Therese M-L Andersson; Benjamin O Anderson; Milena Foerster; Joachim Schüz; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 8.  Pharmacological Treatment of Secondary Lymphedema.

Authors:  Stav Brown; Joseph H Dayan; Michelle Coriddi; Adana Campbell; Kevin Kuonqui; Jinyeon Shin; Hyeung Ju Park; Babak J Mehrara; Raghu P Kataru
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Efficacy of virtual reality-based interventions for patients with breast cancer symptom and rehabilitation management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huayi Zhang; Hui Xu; Zhen-Xiang Zhang; Qiushi Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The effect of the combined use of complex decongestive therapy with electrotherapy modalities for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Hemmati; Zahra Rojhani-Shirazi; Zeinab Sadat Zakeri; Majid Akrami; Nasrin Salehi Dehno
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.