Christina Ly1, Nicole E Nicksic1, Alexandra Loukas2, Alexander V Prokhorov3, Cheryl L Perry1. 1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX. 2. The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, Austin, TX. 3. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined the receptivity of non-college young adult hookah users to health warning labels. METHODS: We conducted in-person qualitative interviews with 23 hookah users, aged 18-29 in Austin, Texas, who were not currently enrolled in college/university. Data were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using NVivo Pro, version 11. RESULTS: Gaps in knowledge were evident regarding the level of chemical exposure, cancer risks, and negative health consequences of hookah use. Respondents preferred warning labels that factually listed health consequences rather than labels that used "sensationalistic" wording (eg, "kills") or technical terms. Participants thought placement of hookah warning labels would be most effective on product packaging or on the door of establishments selling hookah. Respondents thought most of the warning labels would be effective in deterring hookah use; however, the majority stated they would likely continue to use hookah over the next year. CONCLUSIONS: Non-college-attending young adult hookah users preferred hookah health warning labels that are simple, factual, informative, and non-sensationalistic. These results may inform regulations regarding the packaging of tobacco products, specifically in the design and placement of warning labels, which may result in better user message receptivity.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the receptivity of non-college young adult hookah users to health warning labels. METHODS: We conducted in-person qualitative interviews with 23 hookah users, aged 18-29 in Austin, Texas, who were not currently enrolled in college/university. Data were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using NVivo Pro, version 11. RESULTS: Gaps in knowledge were evident regarding the level of chemical exposure, cancer risks, and negative health consequences of hookah use. Respondents preferred warning labels that factually listed health consequences rather than labels that used "sensationalistic" wording (eg, "kills") or technical terms. Participants thought placement of hookah warning labels would be most effective on product packaging or on the door of establishments selling hookah. Respondents thought most of the warning labels would be effective in deterring hookah use; however, the majority stated they would likely continue to use hookah over the next year. CONCLUSIONS: Non-college-attending young adult hookah users preferred hookah health warning labels that are simple, factual, informative, and non-sensationalistic. These results may inform regulations regarding the packaging of tobacco products, specifically in the design and placement of warning labels, which may result in better user message receptivity.
Entities:
Keywords:
hookah; non-college; warning labels; water pipe; young adult
Authors: Adrienne J Heinz; Grace E Giedgowd; Natania A Crane; Jennifer C Veilleux; Megan Conrad; Ashley R Braun; Natalia A Olejarska; Jon D Kassel Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Theodore R Holford; Rafael Meza; Kenneth E Warner; Clare Meernik; Jihyoun Jeon; Suresh H Moolgavkar; David T Levy Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: René A Arrazola; Tushar Singh; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; Benjamin J Apelberg; Rebecca E Bunnell; Conrad J Choiniere; Brian A King; Shanna Cox; Tim McAfee; Ralph S Caraballo Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244