Literature DB >> 22706360

[Impact of cigarette packages warning labels in relation to tobacco-smoking dependence and motivation to quit].

Alice Mannocci1, Daniele Antici, Antonio Boccia, Giuseppe La Torre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the principal aim was to assess the impact of health warnings on cigarette packages in Italy, the reduction of daily number of cigarette smoked, in relationship to the tobacco-smoking dependence and motivation to quit. The second aim was to compare the impact of text warnings versus graphi depictions.
DESIGN: cross-sectional study (survey). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study was conducted through interviews to an opportunistic sample of smokers.The subject enrolled were adult smokers (years ≥ 18), living in the province of Rome. Data were collected in two outpatient clinics located in Morlupo and Rome. Interviews were administered in the waiting rooms, to patients or to their relatives/ helpers. The survey was conducted in June-September 2010. The sample size (266 participants) was computed using a power of 80%, a confidence level of 95%, an expected frequency of smokers with a low motivation to quit who reduced number of cigarettes due to warnings of 15%, and a frequency of smokers with a higher motivation to quit who reduced number of cigarettes due to warnings of 30%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the effect of the health warnings used in Italy on smoking reduction was measured with the following self-reported items: "Are you or have you been influenced by the health warnings on cigarettes packages (in relation to the daily number of cigarettes smoked)?"; "Have you changed your smoking habits due to the warnings (for example: don't smoking after a coffee.)?"; "Have you ever stopped smoking due to the warnings?" The effect of labels that used shock images on cigarette boxes was measured using followed self-reported questions: "If shocking images were used on cigarette boxes, would they have greater effect than simple warning text currently used?"; "If your favourite cigarettes brand decide to change the look of its cigarette boxes with shocking images on smoking health damages, would you be driven to change it?"
RESULTS: thanks to the health warnings, 95% of the 270 participants were informed on smoking damages, 14% (34 smokers) reduced the number cigarettes per day, and 5% (12 smokers) attempted to quit. Forty-five percent of smokers did not know the real impact of light cigarettes on their health, and 49% decided to smoke light cigarettes after having read the warnings. Women were more susceptible to immediate consequences of smoking (appearance of wrinkles; p<0.001), and were more prone to switch to light cigarettes (p=0.002). Smoking dependence, computed with Fagerstrom's test, showed significant differences by age groups (higher in smokers aged 30-45 years; p=0.001), and in smokers who were not interested to deepen knowledge of smoking effects (p=0.009). Individuals more motivated to quit were younger smokers (p=0.012). Smokers aged ≥ 45 years (OR=2.54; 95%CI 1.05-6.17), more motivated to quit (OR=2.92; 95%CI 1.17-7.30), those who reported they do not like the smoking smell on their own clothes (OR=3.6; 95%CI 1.4-9.0), those who reported warning messages are important (OR=4.93; 95%CI 1.55-15.71), those who changed their own smoking behavior due the warnings (OR=3.31; 95%CI 1.10-9.99) were more likely to reduce daily number of cigarettes due the health warnings. Forty-seven percent thought that health warnings with text and images could have a higher impact in comparison to text-only warnings. Moreover, women were more motivated to change cigarette brand if a brand should introduce pictorial warnings (OR=2.54; 95%CI 1.41-4.56).
CONCLUSION: our study showed some positive effects of the introduction of health warnings on cigarette packages. In fact, almost all were informed on tobacco effects, 14% of them reduced the amount of daily smoking, and 5% attempted to quit. Many smokers still believe that switching to lighter cigarettes (e.g. those with less nicotine and tar contents) reduces smoking-related diseases. More than 50% of smokers recognized the importance of health warnings in communicating health risks of smoking, while women were more impressed than men by shocking pictorial warnings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22706360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Prev        ISSN: 1120-9763            Impact factor:   1.901


  7 in total

1.  Smoking ban policies in Italy and the potential impact of the so-called Sirchia Law: state of the art after eight years.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Gualano; Fabrizio Bert; Giacomo Scaioli; Stefano Passi; Giuseppe La Torre; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Demographic characteristics, nicotine dependence, and motivation to quit as possible determinants of smoking behaviors and acceptability of shocking warnings in Italy.

Authors:  Alice Mannocci; Vittoria Colamesta; Vittoria Conti; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza; Gregorino Paone; Maria Cafolla; Rosella Saulle; Vincenzo Bulzomì; Daniele Antici; Pasquale Cuccurullo; Antonio Boccia; Giuseppe La Torre; Claudio Terzano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Awareness of health warnings and factors predicting awareness and perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on tobacco products among adults in rural Puducherry, India.

Authors:  Anindo Majumdar; S Ganesh Kumar; Ramya Selvaraj
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Motivation to quit smoking and acceptability of shocking warnings on cigarette packages in Lebanon.

Authors:  Nelly Layoun; Pascal Salameh; Mirna Waked; Z Aoun Bacha; Rony M Zeenny; Eric El Hitti; Isabelle Godin; Michèle Dramaix
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Perceived Effectiveness of Differing Health Warning Label Messaging Strategies among Adults in the Republic of Georgia: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Cailyn Lingwall; Eric Nehl; Marina Topuridze; Lela Sturua; Nuka Maglakelidze; Carla J Berg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Social Tobacco Warnings Can Influence Implicit Associations and Explicit Cognitions.

Authors:  Barbara C N Müller; Rinske Haverkamp; Silvia Kanters; Huriye Yaldiz; Shuang Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Receptivity of Young Adult Hookah Users to Health Warning Labels.

Authors:  Christina Ly; Nicole E Nicksic; Alexandra Loukas; Alexander V Prokhorov; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.