BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diacetyl-bis(4-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazonato)copperII (CuII (atsm)) ameliorates neurodegeneration and delays disease progression in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the mechanism of action remains uncertain. Promising results were recently reported for separate Phase 1 studies in ALS patients and PD patients. Affected tissue in these disorders shares features of elevated Fe, low glutathione and increased lipid peroxidation consistent with ferroptosis, a novel form of regulated cell death. We therefore evaluated the ability of CuII (atsm) to inhibit ferroptosis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Ferroptosis was induced in neuronal cell models by inhibition of glutathione peroxidase-4 activity with RSL3 or by blocking cystine uptake with erastin. Cell viability and lipid peroxidation were assessed and the efficacy of CuII (atsm) was compared to the known antiferroptotic compound liproxstatin-1. KEY RESULTS: CuII (atsm) protected against lipid peroxidation and ferroptotic lethality in primary and immortalised neuronal cell models (EC50 : ≈130 nM, within an order of magnitude of liproxstatin-1). NiII (atsm) also prevented ferroptosis with similar potency, whereas ionic CuII did not. In cell-free systems, CuII (atsm) and NiII (atsm) inhibited FeII -induced lipid peroxidation, consistent with these compounds quenching lipid radicals. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The antiferroptotic activity of CuII (atsm) could therefore be the disease-modifying mechanism being tested in ALS and PD trials. With potency in vitro approaching that of liproxstatin-1, CuII (atsm) possesses favourable properties such as oral bioavailability and entry into the brain that make it an attractive investigational product for clinical trials of ferroptosis-related diseases.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diacetyl-bis(4-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazonato)copperII (CuII (atsm)) ameliorates neurodegeneration and delays disease progression in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the mechanism of action remains uncertain. Promising results were recently reported for separate Phase 1 studies in ALSpatients and PDpatients. Affected tissue in these disorders shares features of elevated Fe, low glutathione and increased lipid peroxidation consistent with ferroptosis, a novel form of regulated cell death. We therefore evaluated the ability of CuII (atsm) to inhibit ferroptosis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Ferroptosis was induced in neuronal cell models by inhibition of glutathione peroxidase-4 activity with RSL3 or by blocking cystine uptake with erastin. Cell viability and lipid peroxidation were assessed and the efficacy of CuII (atsm) was compared to the known antiferroptotic compound liproxstatin-1. KEY RESULTS:CuII (atsm) protected against lipid peroxidation and ferroptotic lethality in primary and immortalised neuronal cell models (EC50 : ≈130 nM, within an order of magnitude of liproxstatin-1). NiII (atsm) also prevented ferroptosis with similar potency, whereas ionic CuII did not. In cell-free systems, CuII (atsm) and NiII (atsm) inhibited FeII -induced lipid peroxidation, consistent with these compounds quenching lipid radicals. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The antiferroptotic activity of CuII (atsm) could therefore be the disease-modifying mechanism being tested in ALS and PD trials. With potency in vitro approaching that of liproxstatin-1, CuII (atsm) possesses favourable properties such as oral bioavailability and entry into the brain that make it an attractive investigational product for clinical trials of ferroptosis-related diseases.
Authors: E H Pap; G P Drummen; V J Winter; T W Kooij; P Rijken; K W Wirtz; J A Op den Kamp; W J Hage; J A Post Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 1999-06-25 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: D T Dexter; C J Carter; F R Wells; F Javoy-Agid; Y Agid; A Lees; P Jenner; C D Marsden Journal: J Neurochem Date: 1989-02 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Jose Pedro Friedmann Angeli; Manuela Schneider; Bettina Proneth; Yulia Y Tyurina; Vladimir A Tyurin; Victoria J Hammond; Nadja Herbach; Michaela Aichler; Axel Walch; Elke Eggenhofer; Devaraj Basavarajappa; Olof Rådmark; Sho Kobayashi; Tobias Seibt; Heike Beck; Frauke Neff; Irene Esposito; Rüdiger Wanke; Heidi Förster; Olena Yefremova; Marc Heinrichmeyer; Georg W Bornkamm; Edward K Geissler; Stephen B Thomas; Brent R Stockwell; Valerie B O'Donnell; Valerian E Kagan; Joel A Schick; Marcus Conrad Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Zhiguang Xiao; Jens Brose; Sonja Schimo; Susan M Ackland; Sharon La Fontaine; Anthony G Wedd Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: G Grolez; C Moreau; V Danel-Brunaud; C Delmaire; R Lopes; P F Pradat; M M El Mendili; L Defebvre; D Devos Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Michael M Gaschler; Alexander A Andia; Hengrui Liu; Joleen M Csuka; Brisa Hurlocker; Christopher A Vaiana; Daniel W Heindel; Dylan S Zuckerman; Pieter H Bos; Eduard Reznik; Ling F Ye; Yulia Y Tyurina; Annie J Lin; Mikhail S Shchepinov; Amy Y Chan; Eveliz Peguero-Pereira; Maksim A Fomich; Jacob D Daniels; Andrei V Bekish; Vadim V Shmanai; Valerian E Kagan; Lara K Mahal; K A Woerpel; Brent R Stockwell Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Michael Aschner; Alexey A Tinkov; Anatoly V Skalny; Airton C Martins; Anton I Sinitskii; Marcelo Farina; Rongzhu Lu; Fernando Barbosa; Yordanka G Gluhcheva; Abel Santamaria Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 6.168
Authors: Adam Southon; Kathryn Szostak; Karla M Acevedo; Krista A Dent; Irene Volitakis; Abdel A Belaidi; Kevin J Barnham; Peter J Crouch; Scott Ayton; Paul S Donnelly; Ashley I Bush Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Ottis Scrivner; Long Dao; M Karen Newell-Rogers; Babbak Shahandeh; Frank L Meyskens; Susan Kurumi Kozawa; Feng Liu-Smith; Germán Plascencia-Villa; Miguel José-Yacamán; Shang Jia; Christopher J Chang; Patrick J Farmer Journal: Metallomics Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 4.526