Literature DB >> 31654483

The Single-access for Hi-risk PCI (SHiP) technique.

Jason Wollmuth1, Ethan Korngold1, Kevin Croce2, Duane S Pinto3.   

Abstract

Currently, the Impella CP (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) percutaneous ventricular assist catheter requires implantation through a 14 French sheath. Additional arterial access is commonly obtained to perform therapeutic or diagnostic procedures. Multiple arterial access requires time and results in increased risk for vascular complications. Some patients may have limited arterial access. We describe the Single-access for Hi-risk PCI (SHiP) technique to allow for rapid and safer single access utilizing only the Impella access site. After the Impella catheter is placed in the standard fashion, a micropuncture needle is used to pierce the hemostasis valve of the Impella insertion sheath. After dilating the hemostasis valve and exchanging for a 0.035″ wire, up to a 7 French sheath can be inserted for PCI within the 14 French access sheath and alongside the 9 French portion of the Impella catheter. After PCI, the sheath is removed. We report on a case series of 17 patients using this technique. There were no instances of bleeding during the procedure or after removal of the PCI sheath, and no evidence of disruption of the Impella sheath.
© 2019 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31654483      PMCID: PMC7383894          DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


INTRODUCTION

The size of the sheath required for Impella placement is dependent on the largest portion of the device. For the Impella CP catheter, the blood inlet area requires a 14 French sheath. After the blood inlet portion of the catheter is delivered through the sheath into the left ventricle, the shaft of the catheter is what remains. The diameter of this portion of the device is only 9 French. As such, there is another safer option to place an additional sheath for coronary access by utilizing this additional space thereby avoiding the perils of additional access site cannulation.1, 2

TECHNIQUE DESCRIPTION

The 14 French Impella sheath (Figure 1) is placed in the standard fashion over an 0.035″ wire. Subsequently, a micropuncture access needle is used to pierce the hemostasis valve in the superior portion of the sheath with care to avoid piercing the Impella catheter (Figure 2). After exchanging for an 0.035″ wire, an 8 French dilator is used to dilate the hemostasis valve and the sheath for PCI is placed (Figure 3). After PCI, the sheath can simply be removed since the defect closes upon itself. If the Impella catheter is to be removed, the arteriotomy is closed in the standard fashion. If the Impella catheter is left in place, the sheath can be removed and the reaccess sheath inserted in the standard fashion.
Figure 1

Impella insertion sheath

Figure 2

Illustration depicting suggested entry points for puncture using the SHiP technique

Figure 3

Example of Impella catheter and PCI sheath placed within the Impella insertion sheath

Impella insertion sheath Illustration depicting suggested entry points for puncture using the SHiP technique Example of Impella catheter and PCI sheath placed within the Impella insertion sheath

CASE SERIES

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the patients and procedures in this series. Nearly all patients underwent left main coronary artery intervention in the setting of active congestive heart failure and significantly reduced left ventricular contractile function. Two patients had severe aortic stenosis and underwent concomitant balloon aortic valvuloplasty using the same single access. In one of these, the Impella 2.5 catheter was used with the 14 French sheath because the Impella CP catheter would not cross the stenotic aortic valve. The Impella CP catheter was used in all other cases. Multivessel intervention (94%) and atherectomy (88%) were employed in nearly all cases. The Impella catheter was removed in the catheterization laboratory in all but 3 cases, and the insertion sheath was removed in all cases. It is not the practice of the operators to leave the insertion sheath in place outside the catheterization laboratory, given risk for limb ischemia. As such, other sheaths besides the sheath supplied with the Impella catheter were not utilized in this series.
Table 1

Characteristics of the patients and procedures

Age (y)SexPresentationLVEF (%)NYHASevere ASLMCAMultivesselAtherectomyHemostasis valve bleedingImpella removed in catheterization laboratoryAccess complication
53MNSTEMI15IVNNYNNNN
83FNSTEMI35IVNYYYNNY
90MNSTEMI30IVYNYYNYN
65FNSTEMI60IVNYYYNYN
82MNSTEMI15IVNYYYNYN
69MNSTEMI20IVNYYYNYN
75FNSTEMI25IVNYYYNYN
88MNSTEMI45IVYYYYNYN
79FNSTEMI30IVNYYYNNN
53FUA20IVNYYYNYN
70MNSTEMI40IVNYYYNYN
74FELECTIVE50IVNYYYNYN
75FNSTEMI30IVNYYNNYN
62MELECTIVE55IIYYYYNYN
66MNSTEMI20IVNYYYNYN
78MELECTIVE30IIINYYYNYN
83MNSTEMI30IVNNNYNYN

Abbreviations: AS, aortic stenosis; LMCA, left main coronary artery; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NSTEMI, non‐ST segment myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association Classification.

Characteristics of the patients and procedures Abbreviations: AS, aortic stenosis; LMCA, left main coronary artery; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NSTEMI, non‐ST segment myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association Classification. Many of the procedures were lengthy, and in 35% (n = 6), PCI for chronic total occlusions were performed. Despite the length of time that the sheaths were indwelling, there was no evidence of bleeding through the hemostasis valve during the cases or after removal of the PCI sheath. Furthermore, there was no thrombus formation after removal of the Impella sheath and catheters in all but one patient. This patient was noted to have iliac thrombus on angiography during Impella catheter removal several days after the PCI procedure.

DISCUSSION

We report a technique to rapidly and safely perform complex PCI using only the arterial access obtained for Impella placement. This technique obviates the need for unnecessary additional arterial access and avoids delays and the risk of multiple access site complications which can be of significant importance among those who are urgently ill or with limited access site options due to peripheral arterial disease. There was one patient with a vascular complication in this series. It is uncertain whether this was related to either the Impella, PCI sheath placement, use of the SHiP technique, or simply the indwelling catheter in the artery. It is important to puncture the sheath diaphragm away from the central portion to maintain hemostasis and then the sheath inserted over a wire. If the sheath is simply advanced into the insertion sheath, there will be bleeding as the valve cannot form a tight seal around both the Impella catheter and PCI sheath. While a 6 French × 10 cm sheath can be used and was in 4 cases, we recommend the use of a 7 French × 45 cm sheath with a 35‐cm hydrophilic coating to improve the ease of insertion and to afford greater ability to torque up to a 7 French PCI guiding catheter. An attempt was made to use an 8 French sheathless guide in one case but was unsuccessful. We emphasize that care should also be taken when advancing the sheath so as not to disrupt the integrity of the peel‐away introducer sheath.

CONCLUSION

The SHiP technique is a simple, safe, and reproducible way to perform coronary revascularization procedures and mechanical circulatory support using single arterial access. This strategy affords the opportunity to avoid unnecessary vascular complications and the ability to treat individuals with limited vascular access as in this case. Video S1 Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  3 in total

1.  Vascular Access Site and Outcomes Among 26,807 Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Angioplasty Cases From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.

Authors:  Tim Kinnaird; Richard Anderson; Nick Ossei-Gerning; Sean Gallagher; Adrian Large; Julian Strange; Peter Ludman; Mark de Belder; James Nolan; David Hildick-Smith; Mamas Mamas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.195

2.  Access site complications after peripheral vascular interventions: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel Ortiz; Arshad Jahangir; Maharaj Singh; Suhail Allaqaband; Tanvir K Bajwa; Mark W Mewissen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  The Single-access for Hi-risk PCI (SHiP) technique.

Authors:  Jason Wollmuth; Ethan Korngold; Kevin Croce; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Practice Patterns in the Interventional Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Global Survey.

Authors:  Ilias Nikolakopoulos; Evangelia Vemmou; Judit Karacsonyi; Lorenzo Azzalini; Brian A Bergmark; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Allison B Hall; Jason Wollmuth; Kevin Croce; Hani Jneid; Bavana V Rangan; M Nicholas Burke; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  A simple technique to obtain postprocedural antegrade angiographic control in single-access Impella-protected PCI.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Enrico Romagnoli; Cristina Aurigemma; Piergiorgio Bruno; Stefano Cangemi; Francesco Bianchini; Carlo Trani
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  A new iteration for the single-access large-bore technique during Impella supported complex and high-risk coronary intervention: a case report.

Authors:  Marco Araco; Angelo Quagliana; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 4.  A Review of the Impella Devices.

Authors:  Rami Zein; Chirdeep Patel; Adrian Mercado-Alamo; Theodore Schreiber; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 5.  #SoMe for #IC: Optimal use of social media in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; Benjamin Z Galper; Chadi Alraies; Suzanne V Arnold; Matthew Daniels; Davide Capodanno; Giuseppe Tarantini; David J Cohen; Herbert D Aronow
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.585

6.  The Single-access for Hi-risk PCI (SHiP) technique.

Authors:  Jason Wollmuth; Ethan Korngold; Kevin Croce; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Fill Two Needs With One Deed! Single-Access Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella Hemodynamic Support.

Authors:  Taha Ahmed; Samra Haroon Lodhi; Talha Ahmed; Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk; Emad Dean Nukta
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-01-20

8.  The "lend a hand" external bypass technique: External radial to femoral bypass for antegrade perfusion of an ischemic limb with occlusive large bore sheath - A novel and favorable approach.

Authors:  Hady Lichaa
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.