| Literature DB >> 31653947 |
Giana Carla Gaboardi1, Débora Alves2, Diego Gil de Los Santos3, Eduardo Xavier2, Ana Paula Nunes4, Paula Finger5, Emili Griep5, Victor Roll2, Patrícia Oliveira5, Arthur Silva5, Ângela Moreira6, Fabricio Conceição5.
Abstract
This study was conducted in quails to evaluate the probiotic potential of Pichia pastoris X-33, cultivated in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in standard medium Yeast Extract-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD). Forty-days-old female quails were divided into three treatments: T1 (Control) received a basal diet without P. pastoris; T2 (Pichia Effluent) received a basal diet supplemented with P. pastoris grown in parboiled rice effluent and biodiesel glycerol, and T3 (Pichia YPD) received a basal diet supplemented with P. pastoris produced in YPD. The birds were vaccinated against Newcastle Disease (NDV), Avian Infectious Bronchitis (IBV), and Gumboro Disease on days 1 and 28. The following parameters were analyzed: performance, egg quality, humoral immune response to the vaccines, organ weight, and intestinal morphometry. P. pastoris grown in YPD increased egg weight (p < 0.05). The lowest liver weight on day 14 was obtained in Pichia Effluent, whereas both P. pastoris supplemented groups had the lowest duodenum weights on day 14. Besides that, livers and duodenums presented no morphological changes in any of the three treatments. Supplementation of P. pastoris modulated the immune system of the birds, increasing anti-IBV, anti-NDV, and anti-Gumboro antibodies levels compared to the Control (p < 0.05). In conclusion, quail's immune response was improved by Pichia pastoris X-33, either it was grown in YPD or industrial residues, and the egg weight increased with Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in YPD, thereby demonstrating to be a promising probiotic for poultry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31653947 PMCID: PMC6814787 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51908-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Productive performance of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Time | Treatments | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Treatment | Time | Treat*Time | |||||
| Body weight (g) | 0 d | 305.30 | 301.27 | 305.26 | 2.600 | 0.0322 | <0.0001 | 0.9571 |
| 0–28 d | 363.91 | 370.05 | 359.20 | |||||
| 28–56 d | 389.06 | 397.58 | 384.99 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 404.93ab | 415.98a | 389.65b | |||||
| Body weight gain (g) | 0–28 d | 58.61 | 68.78 | 53.94 | 0.0110 | <0.0001 | 0.9799 | |
| 28–56 d | 83.77 | 96.31 | 79.74 | 2.501 | ||||
| 56–84 d | 99.63ab | 114.70a | 84.40b | |||||
| Feed intake (g/d) | 0–28 d | 42.52 | 42.51 | 41.59 | 0.334 | 0.5488 | 0.8701 | 0.8730 |
| 28–56 d | 42.66 | 42.53 | 41.89 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 41.89 | 43.43 | 42.47 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Egg production (%) | 0–28 d | 78.53 | 79.23 | 85.28 | 1.242 | 0.9047 | 0.0010 | 0.2772 |
| 28–56 d | 93.23 | 86.48 | 85.37 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 91.21 | 93.54 | 91.44 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Egg mass (g/bird/d) | 0–28 d | 11.30 | 11.22 | 11.68 | 0.432 | 0.5881 | 0.2711 | 0.794 |
| 28–56 d | 13.98 | 12.70 | 12.25 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 13.87 | 13.64 | 13.33 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Feed conversion/Egg mass (g/g) | 0–28 d | 5.19 | 4.30 | 3.81 | 0.153 | 0.7984 | 0.0019 | 0.2127 |
| 28–56 d | 3.11 | 3.75 | 3.62 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 3.07 | 3.18 | 3.25 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
Internal egg quality parameters of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Time | Treatments | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Treatment | Time | Treat*Time | |||||
| Egg weight (g) | 0–28 d | 14.24 | 14.52 | 14.20 | 0.108 | 0.0254 | 0.0664 | 0.8204 |
| 28–56 d | 14.37b | 15.11ab | 15.35a | |||||
| 56–84 d | 14.24b | 15.25ab | 15.95a | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Yolk weight (g) | 0–28 d | 4.24 | 4.13 | 4.29 | 0.037 | 0.9417 | 0.0005 | 0.6902 |
| 28–56 d | 4.57 | 4.50 | 4.38 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 4.51 | 4.57 | 4.62 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Yolk ratio (%) | 0–28 d | 29.02a | 26.88b | 30.20a | 0.247 | 0.0137 | 0.0237 | 0.1942 |
| 28–56 d | 29.38 | 29.78 | 30.62 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 29.94 | 29.98 | 30.87 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Albumen weight (g) | 0–28 d | 7.61 | 7.59 | 7.27 | 0.069 | 0.1248 | 0.1012 | 0.9664 |
| 28–56 d | 7.78 | 8.03 | 7.61 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 7.78 | 7.98 | 7.66 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Albumen ratio (%) | 0–28 d | 51.85 | 49.49 | 51.26 | 0.466 | 0.4968 | 0.2143 | 0.2740 |
| 28–56 d | 51.44 | 53.08 | 52.98 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 48.50 | 52.33 | 51.19 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Haugh Unit | 0–28 d | 92.26 | 92.00 | 92.71 | 0.365 | 0.8224 | 0.0532 | 0.6890 |
| 28–56 d | 92.50 | 92.29 | 92.41 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 94.01 | 95.69 | 93.22 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
Egg yolk color parameters of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Time | Treatments | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Treatment | Time | Treat*Time | |||||
Yolk color (DSM® color fan) | 0–28 d | 3.80 | 3.91 | 4.10 | 0.037 | 0.7723 | <0.0001 | 0.1197 |
| 28–56 d | 4.16 | 4.31 | 4.23 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 3.91 | 3.73 | 3.71 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Lightness (L*) | 0–28 d | 56.81 | 58.82 | 57.15 | 0.297 | 0.3562 | 0.0001 | 0.4229 |
| 28–56 d | 59.62 | 59.86 | 59.44 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 56.18 | 57.89 | 58.05 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Redness (a*) | 0–28 d | -5.47 | -5.58 | -5.44 | 0.059 | 0.0366 | <0.0001 | 0.1539 |
| 28–56 d | -4.92 | -4.76 | -5.00 | |||||
| 56–84 d | -5.68b | -5.98ab | -6.21a | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Yellowness (b*) | 0–28 d | 35.51 | 36.37 | 35.18 | 0.308 | 0.1573 | <0.0001 | 0.9582 |
| 28–56 d | 39.68 | 40.57 | 38.59 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 36.35 | 37.00 | 36.26 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
External egg quality parameters of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Time | Treatments | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Treatment | Time | Treat*Time | |||||
| Specific gravity | 0–28 d | 1074.80 | 1075.13 | 1074.80 | 3.729 | 0.4097 | 0.6756 | 0.5044 |
| 28–56 d | 1069.50 | 1069.13 | 1070.80 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 1046.00 | 1077.69 | 1076.50 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Eggshell weight (g) | 0–28 d | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.13 | 0.010 | 0.5096 | 0.1717 | 0.9905 |
| 28–56 d | 1.16 | 1.12 | 1.13 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 1.19 | 1.18 | 1.16 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Eggshell ratio (%) | 0–28 d | 7.88 | 7.85 | 7.92 | 0.048 | 0.3178 | 0.0567 | 0.5900 |
| 28–56 d | 7.56 | 7.41 | 7.86 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 7.83 | 7.74 | 7.77 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Eggshell thickness (mm) | 0–28 d | 0.290 | 0.287 | 0.291 | 0.002 | 0.7663 | 0.0511 | 0.9042 |
| 28–56 d | 0.298 | 0.298 | 0.307 | |||||
| 56–84 d | 0.299 | 0.297 | 0.296 | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
Figure 1Evaluation by ELISA of antibodies anti - Gumboro disease (A), anti - Avian Infectious Bronchitis (B) and anti - Newcastle (C) of quails vaccinated against these diseases and fed diets containing P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium. *Significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test.
Anti-NDV antibodies titer (log2), obtained by hemagglutination inhibition test (HI), of quails vaccinated against Newcastle Disease (NDV) and fed diets containing P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Days after vaccination | Control | SEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 d | 2.75 | 2.75 | 2.5 | 0.083 | 0.9499 |
| 28 d | 2.0 | 2.75 | 3.0 | 0.300 | 0.5785 |
| 56 d | 5.0 | 4.25 | 4.5 | 0.220 | 0.4355 |
| 84 d | 4.25b | 6.0ab | 7.5a | 0.939 | 0.0097 |
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD.
Relative weight of organs (g/100 g body weight) of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Organ | Time | Treatments | SEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | ||||||
| Heart | 14 d | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.015 | 0.8506 |
| 28 d | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.038 | 0.1467 | |
| 56 d | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.019 | 0.5986 | |
| 84 d | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.035 | 0.4898 | |
| Liver | 14 d | 2.55a | 1.94b | 2.13ab | 0.178 | 0.0431 |
| 28 d | 2.02 | 1.75 | 1.87 | 0.079 | 0.3935 | |
| 56 d | 1.96 | 2.12 | 2.00 | 0.047 | 0.7308 | |
| 84 d | 1.59 | 1.76 | 1.41 | 0.102 | 0.3911 | |
| Spleen | 14 d | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.008 | 0.3107 |
| 28 d | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.004 | 0.5963 | |
| 56 d | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.012 | 0.2690 | |
| 84 d | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.007 | 0.4335 | |
| Bursa of Fabricius | 14 d | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.007 | 0.8043 |
| 28 d | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.004 | 0.5121 | |
| 56 d | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.2955 | |
| 84 d | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.009 | 0.4206 | |
| Duodenum | 14 d | 1.49a | 1.04b | 1.10b | 0.143 | 0.0295 |
| 28 d | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.005 | 0.9888 | |
| 56 d | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.033 | 0.6906 | |
| 84 d | 0.87a | 0.86ab | 0.72b | 0.051 | 0.0489 | |
| Ceca | 14 d | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.051 | 0.7005 |
| 28 d | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.052 | 0.3506 | |
| 56 d | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.055 | 0.3206 | |
| 84 d | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.026 | 0.7299 | |
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
Morphometric analysis of villus height and crypt depth in duodenum of quails fed diets containing Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol or in YPD medium.
| Time | Treatments | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | ||||||
Villus height (µm) | 14 d | 982 | 1,026 | 1,008 | 8.56 | 0.0691 |
| 28 d | 997 | 1,040 | 1,018 | 7.80 | 0.1990 | |
| 56 d | 1,013 | 1,034 | 1,036 | 9.50 | 0.4454 | |
| 84 d | 1,052 | 1,065 | 1,069 | 9.95 | 0.8771 | |
| Crypt depth (µm) | 14 d | 158 | 147 | 125 | 1.58 | 0.5547 |
| 28 d | 152 | 190 | 157 | 1.73 | 0.4891 | |
| 56 d | 176 | 192 | 161 | 1.47 | 0.7159 | |
| 84 d | 191 | 194 | 166 | 2.06 | 0.9330 | |
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference between averages (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s test; SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = basal diet; Pichia Effluent = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel glycerol; Pichia YPD = basal diet + P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD medium.
Composition of basal diet.
| Ingredient | Content (%) |
|---|---|
| Corn, grain | 44.60 |
| Soybean meal | 40.38 |
| Limestone | 5.83 |
| Vitamin mineral mixb | 5.00 |
| Soybean oil | 2.50 |
| Dicalcium Phosphate | 1.20 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.22 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.18 |
| L-Lysine HCl | 0.08 |
|
| |
| ME (kcal/kg)a | 2805 |
| CP (%)a | 21.98 |
| Digestible lysine (%) | 1.18 |
| Digestible methionine (%) | 0.50 |
| Digestible methionine + cysteine (%) | 0.80 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.34 |
| Calcium (%) | 3.50 |
| Sodium (%) | 0.24 |
| Chloride (5) | 0.15 |
| Threonine (%) | 0.75 |
| Tryptophan (%) | 0.26 |
aME = metabolizable energy; CP = crude protein.
bComposition per kilogram of product: zinc: 1535 mg; manganese: 1485 mg; iron: 1695 mg; iodine: 29 mg; copper: 244 mg; selenium: 3,2 mg; calcium: 197,5 g; cobalt: 5,1 mg; fluoride: 400 mg; phosphorus: 50 g; methionine: 11 g; vitamin E: 540 mg; vitamin B1: 40 mg; vitamin B6: 54 mg; vitamin K3: 51,5 mg; vitamin B12: 430 mcg; vitamin A: 207,000 IU; vitamin D3: 43,200 IU; vitamin B2: 120 mg; pantothenic acid: 204,6 mg; choline: 320 mg; biotin: 1,4 mg; folic acid: 16,7 mg; nicotinic acid: 840 mg.