| Literature DB >> 31653207 |
Andrew M Penn1, Nicole S Croteau2,3, Kristine Votova4,5, Colin Sedgwick6, Robert F Balshaw7, Shelagh B Coutts8, Melanie Penn1, Kaitlin Blackwood2, Maximilian B Bibok2, Viera Saly1, Janka Hegedus1,8, Amy Y X Yu9, Charlotte Zerna8, Evgenia Klourfeld8, Mary L Lesperance3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure (BP) at emergency department (ED) presentation and advancing age have been associated with risk of ischemic stroke; however, the relationship between BP, age, and transient ischemic attack/minor stroke (TIA/MS) is not clear.Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Emergency medicine; Minor stroke; TIA; Transient ischemic attack
Year: 2019 PMID: 31653207 PMCID: PMC6815025 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1466-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Baseline patient characteristics
| Variable | All patients | TIA/minor stroke | Stroke-mimic | p* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 68.7 (15.5) | 71.6 (13.7) | 61.4 (17.0) | < 0.001 |
| Sex, male (%) | 573 (52.9) | 442 (57.6) | 131 (41.5) | < 0.001 |
| Symptom onset to ED presentation, hours, median [IQR] | 2.3 [1.3, 4.9] | 2.3 [1.3, 4.9] | 2.3 [1.3, 4.6] | 0.862 |
| Time of ED presentation | 0.317 | |||
| (midnight—4 am] | 70 (6.5) | 51 (6.6) | 19 (6.0) | |
| (4 am—8 am] | 85 (7.8) | 61 (7.9) | 24 (7.6) | |
| (8 am—noon] | 390 (36.0) | 267 (34.8) | 123 (38.9) | |
| (noon—4 pm] | 293 (27.0) | 207 (27.0) | 86 (27.2) | |
| (4 pm—8 pm] | 144 (13.3) | 100 (13.0) | 44 (13.9) | |
| (8 pm—midnight] | 102 (9.4) | 82 (10.7) | 20 (6.3) | |
| Anxiety/Panic Feeling (%) | 67 (6.2) | 44 (5.7) | 23 (7.3) | 0.410 |
| Investigations (%) | ||||
| MRI | 999 (92.2) | 720 (93.8) | 279 (88.3) | 0.004 |
| CTA | 884 (81.5) | 660 (85.9) | 224 (70.9) | < 0.001 |
| CT | 1014 (93.5) | 737 (96.0) | 277 (87.7) | < 0.001 |
| Medical History (%) | ||||
| Diabetes | 193 (17.8) | 143 (18.6) | 50 (15.8) | 0.314 |
| Hypertension | 620 (57.2) | 471 (61.3) | 149 (47.2) | < 0.001 |
| Medications (%) | ||||
| Statin for at least the last 30 days | 349 (32.2) | 265 (34.6) | 84 (26.6) | 0.013 |
| Antiplatelets for at least the last 7 days | 386 (35.6) | 296 (38.6) | 90 (28.5) | 0.002 |
| Beta blocker | 207 (19.1) | 166 (21.6) | 41 (13.0) | 0.001 |
| Calcium blocker | 150 (13.8) | 115 (15.0) | 35 (11.1) | 0.111 |
| Diuretic | 188 (17.3) | 146 (19.0) | 42 (13.3) | 0.030 |
| ACE inhibitor | 262 (24.2) | 197 (25.7) | 65 (20.6) | 0.090 |
| Angiotensin II receptor antagonist | 178 (16.4) | 137 (17.8) | 41 (13.0) | 0.061 |
| Vitamin K antagonist | 37 (3.4) | 30 (3.9) | 7 (2.2) | 0.225 |
| Novel anticoagulant | 46 (4.2) | 39 (5.1) | 7 (2.2) | 0.050 |
| 90-day Outcomes (%) | 0.003 | |||
| Death | 23 (2.1) | 16 (2.1) | 7 (2.2) | |
| Stroke | 33 (3.0) | 31 (4.0) | 2 (0.6) | |
| Lost to follow-up | 55 (5.1) | 31 (4.0) | 24 (7.6) | |
| No event | 973 (89.8) | 690 (89.8) | 283 (89.6) | |
| TOAST (%) | ||||
| Cardioembolic | 124 (11.4) | 124 (16.1) | ||
| Cryptogenic | 285 (26.3) | 285 (37.1) | ||
| Large-artery atherosclerosis | 122 (11.3) | 112 (15.9) | ||
| Small-vessel occlusion | 77 (7.1) | 77 (10.0) | ||
| Other known etiologies | 22 (2.0) | 22 (2.9) | ||
| Competing etiologies | 34 (3.1) | 34 (4.4) | ||
Medication data for statin, antiplatelets, and vitamin K antagonist missing for 1 case; TOAST subtype unavailable for 104 cases due to incomplete evaluation.
CT computed tomography, CTA computed tomography angiography, ED emergency department, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, SD standard deviation.
*p-values computed from Pearson’s chi-square test of homogeneity for categorical variables, Welch’s t-test and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables reported with mean and median, respectively
Fig. 1Relationship between systolic blood pressure and (a) final diagnosis, b TOAST classification, and between diastolic blood pressure and (c) final diagnosis, d TOAST classification. Blood pressure sample means ± standard errors are plotted
Fig. 2Conditional inference tree estimating the effects of age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, hypertension, and feelings of anxiety
Logistic regression model estimating effects of age, sex, BP, with age-BP interaction on TIA/minor stroke
| Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic model | |||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.59 | 0.15 | < 0.001 | 1.81 | 1.36–2.41 |
| Age (< 60 vs. 60–79 years) | −0.21 | 1.40 | 0.880 | 0.81 | 0.05–12.67 |
| Age (≥80 vs. 60–79 years) | 4.06 | 0.97 | < 0.001 | 58.09 | 8.71–387.53 |
| Systolica | 0.21 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | 1.23 | 1.11–1.35 |
| Systolica: Age (< 60 vs. 60–79 years) | − 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.671 | 0.96 | 0.80–1.16 |
| Systolica: Age (≥80 vs. 60–79 years) | − 0.21 | 0.06 | < 0.001 | 0.81 | 0.72–0.91 |
| (Intercept) | −2.76 | 0.72 | < 0.001 | ||
| Diastolic model | |||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.59 | 0.15 | < 0.001 | 1.80 | 1.35–2.40 |
| Age (< 60 vs. 60–79 years) | 0.84 | 1.37 | 0.542 | 2.31 | 0.15–34.17 |
| Age (≥80 vs. 60–79 years) | 4.13 | 0.98 | < 0.001 | 62.13 | 9.03–427.61 |
| Diastolica | 0.29 | 0.08 | < 0.001 | 1.34 | 1.14–1.58 |
| Diastolica: Age (< 60 vs. 60–79 years) | −0.21 | 0.16 | 0.177 | 0.81 | 0.59–1.10 |
| Diastolic*: Age (≥80 vs. 60–79 years) | −0.39 | 0.12 | < 0.001 | 0.68 | 0.54–0.85 |
| (Intercept) | −2.18 | 0.72 | 0.002 | ||
CI confidence interval; OR odds ratio; SE standard error.
aPer 10 mmHg. In these models, the reference group for age is 60–79 years
Fig. 3Nomogram for the reduced logistic regression model predicting TIA/minor stroke versus stroke-mimic with from sex and the interaction of age and systolic blood pressure. To use the nomogram for a patient with given SBP, age, and sex, use the ‘Points’ scale at the top of the figure to ascertain points for each variable aligning the scale vertically with the variable value. For example, for a male patient aged 50 with SBP of 120 mmHg, score 15 points for male and 15 points for age < 60 years with SBP of 120 mmHg. The ‘Total Points’ value is 30. Align the value of 30 on the ‘Total Points’ scale with the ‘Probability’ scale, to determine an approximate probability of TIA/MS of 0.40 for this patient. Note that the SBP points for patients older than 80 years decrease with increasing SBP as the SBP odds ratio for that group is less than one