| Literature DB >> 31653083 |
Hong-Lei Li1,2,3, Xiao-Ming Li4,5,6, Sui-Qun Yang7,8,9, Ling-Hong Meng10,11,12, Xin Li13,14,15, Bin-Gui Wang16,17,18.
Abstract
Three new prenylated phenol derivatives, terreprenphenols A-C (1-3), along with four known related compounds (4-7), were isolated from Aspergillus terreus EN-539, an endophytic fungus obtained from the marine red alga Laurencia okamurai. The structures of these compounds were established by extensive analysis of 1D/2D NMR data, mass spectrometric data, and optical rotation (OR). The corresponding relationship between absolute configuration and optical rotation for known compounds anodendroic acid (4) and asperterreusine C (5) was ambiguous in literature, and their absolute configurations were therefore discussed and confirmed for the first time by time-dependent density functional (TDDFT) ECD and OR calculations. Compounds 1-7 inhibited some common aquatic bacteria with MIC values ranging from 2 to 64 μg/mL.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus terreus; Laurencia okamurai; antibacterial activity; benzofuran; endophytic fungus; prenylated phenol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31653083 PMCID: PMC6891482 DOI: 10.3390/md17110605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of the isolated compounds 1–7 and reference compounds 8–10.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of compounds 1–3.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 128.1, C | 129.1, C | 129.8, C | |||
| 2 | 128.9, CH | 7.59, s | 130.6, CH | 7.71, s | 133.2, CH | 8.50, s |
| 3 | 125.8, C | 118.2, C | 121.8, C | |||
| 4 | 160.8, C | 154.5, C | 159.2, C | |||
| 5 | 115.0, CH | 6.77, d (9.1) | 115.1, CH | 6.69, d (8.3) | 117.9, CH | 7.72, d (8.4) |
| 6 | 127.7, CH | 7.58, d (9.1) | 128.0, CH | 7.70, d (8.3) | 129.8, CH | 8.46, d (8.4) |
| 7 | 196.4, C | 173.4, C | 191.9, CH | 10.64, s | ||
| 8 | 64.3, CH2 | 4.63, s | ||||
| 1’ | 28.1, CH2 | 30.3, CH2 | 2.75, dd (7.4, 16.6) | 31.4, CH2 | 3.54, dd (7.1, 16.8) | |
| 2’ | 122.7, CH | 3.22, d (7.3) | 68.6, CH | 3.77, dd (5.3, 7.4) | 68.0, CH | 4.54, dd (4.9, 7.1) |
| 3’ | 131.3, C | 5.29, t (7.3) | 76.6, C | 79.4, C | ||
| 4’ | 17.6, CH3 | 1.67, s | 19.2, CH3 | 1.26, s | 22.0, CH3 | 2.07, s |
| 5’ | 25.5, CH3 | 1.70, s | 24.1, CH3 | 1.33, s | 26.2, CH3 | 2.13, s |
Measured in DMSO-d6. Measured in CD3OD.
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY (bold lines) and HMBC (red arrows) correlations of compounds 1–3.
Figure 3Measured and calculated ECD spectra of compounds 4 and 5 at B3LYP/6-31G level.
The calculated and measured optical rotations (ORs) of compounds 4 and 5 a.
| Compounds | 4 | 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2’ | 2’ | 2’ | 2’ | |
| calculated OR | −60.9 | +61.0 | −91.3 | +95.5 |
| measured OR | −95.0 | −55.0 | ||
The ORs were calculated and measured at 589.3 nm in MeOH.
The antimicrobial activities of compounds 1–7 (MIC, μg/mL) a.
| Compounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 32 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 32 |
| 2 | 64 | n.a. | 32 | 32 | 64 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| 3 | n.a. | n.a. | 64 | 32 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| 4 | n.a. | 32 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 64 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| 5 | n.a. | 64 | n.a. | 32 | n.a. | 32 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| 6 | 8 | 16 | 16 | n.a. | n.a. | 64 | 32 | 8 | n.a. |
| 7 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 64 |
| Chloramphenicol | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
aAh: Aeromonas hydrophila. Et: Edwardsiella tarda. Ec: Escherichia coli. Ml: Micrococcus luteus. Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sa: Staphylococcus aureus. Vh: Vibrio harveyi. Vp: V. parahemolyticus. Vv: Vibrio vulnificus. n.a.: No activity, MIC > 64 μg/mL.