| Literature DB >> 31652901 |
Hong Minh Thi Le1, Quynh Thi Do2,3, Mai Huong Thi Doan4, Quyen Thi Vu5, Mai Anh Nguyen6, Thu Huyen Thi Vu7, Hai Dang Nguyen8, Nguyen Thi Thuy Duong9, Manh Hung Tran10, Van Minh Chau11, Van Cuong Pham12.
Abstract
Marine microorganisms are an invaluable source of novel active secondary metabolites possessing various biological activities. In this study, the extraction and isolation of the marine sediment Penicillium species collected in Vietnam yielded ten secondary metabolites, including sporogen AO-1 (1), 3-indolecarbaldehyde (2), 2-[(5-methyl-1,4-dioxan-2-yl)methoxy]ethanol (3), 2-[(2R-hydroxypropanoyl)amino]benzamide (4), 4-hydroxybenzandehyde (5), chrysogine (6), 3-acetyl-4-hydroxycinnoline (7), acid 1H-indole-3-acetic (8), cyclo (Tyr-Trp) (9), and 2',3'-dihydrosorbicillin (10). Their structures were identified by the analysis of 1D and 2D NMR data. Among the isolated compounds, 2-[(5-methyl-1,4-dioxan-2-yl)methoxy]ethanol (3) showed a strong inhibitory effect against Enterococcus faecalis with a minimum inhibitory concentration value of 32 µg/mL. Both 2-[(2R-hydroxypropanoyl)amino]benzamide (4) and 4-hydroxybenzandehyde (5) selectively inhibited E. coli with minimum inhibitory concentration values of 16 and 8 µg/mL, respectively. 2',3'-Dihydrosorbicillin (10) potentially inhibited α-glucosidase activity at a concentration of 2.0 mM (66.31%).Entities:
Keywords: 3-acetyl-4-hydroxycinnoline; 4-hydroxybenzandehit; antimicrobiology; marine fungi Penicillium sp.; α-glucosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652901 PMCID: PMC6864758 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Appearance of M30 strain’s colonies.
Minimum inhibitory concentration values of extract and isolated metabolites from Penicillium sp.
| Samples/Compounds | Gram (+) (a) | Gram (-) (a) | Yeast (a) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | 256 | 256 | - | 128 | - | 64 |
|
| 256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 128 |
|
| 256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 128 |
|
| 32 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 64 |
|
| >256 | >256 | >256 | 16 | 128 | >256 | >256 |
|
| >256 | >256 | >256 | 8 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
|
| >256 | >256 | >256 | 64 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
|
| 64 | 256 | 256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 128 |
|
| 64 | 128 | 256 | >256 | 128 | 256 | 128 |
|
| 256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
|
| >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
|
| 256 | 256 | 128 | 32 | 256 | 128 | - |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 |
(a) Results are calculated in µg/mL. (b) Positive compounds.
Figure 2Chemical structures of compounds 1–10.
Figure 3Selected key correlations in the HMBC spectrum () of 7.
α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 1–10.
| Sample | Concentration (mM) | % Inhibition(a) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 100 µg/mL | - |
| 500 µg/mL | 44.78 ± 1.73 | |
|
| 0.5 | - |
| 2.0 | - | |
|
| 0.5 | - |
| 2.0 | - | |
|
| 0.5 | - |
| 2.0 | - | |
|
| 0.5 | 12.19 ± 2.93 |
| 2.0 | 18.44 ± 3.94 | |
|
| 0.5 | 14.45 ± 1.28 |
| 2.0 | 18.80 ± 0.54 | |
|
| 0.5 | - |
| 2.0 | - | |
|
| 0.5 | 9.42 ± 1.03 |
| 2.0 | 18.81 ± 1.97 | |
|
| 0.5 | 19.79 ± 0.83 |
| 2.0 | 40.31 ± 0.50 | |
|
| 0.5 | 17.91 ± 1.13 |
| 2.0 | 39.23 ± 0.68 | |
|
| 0.5 | 12.11 ± 0.60 |
| 2.0 | 66.31 ± 0.09 | |
| Acarbose (b) | 100 µg/mL | 19.69 ± 2.28 |
| 500 µg/mL | 55.18 ± 0.67 |
(a) The experiments were carried out in three replicates. (b) Positive compound.