| Literature DB >> 31652020 |
Joël Jovanovic1,2, Xuan Liu1,3, Despina Kokona1,2, Martin S Zinkernagel1,2, Andreas Ebneter1,2.
Abstract
The role of microglia in retinal inflammation is still ambiguous. Branch retinal vein occlusion initiates an inflammatory response whereby resident microglia cells are activated. They trigger infiltration of neutrophils that exacerbate blood-retina barrier damage, regulate postischemic inflammation and irreversible loss of neuroretina. Suppression of microglia-mediated inflammation might bear potential for mitigating functional impairment after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). To test this hypothesis, we depleted microglia by PLX5622 (a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor) in fractalkine receptor reporter mice (Cx3cr1gfp/+ ) subjected to various regimens of PLX5622 treatment and experimental RVO. Effectiveness of microglia suppression and retinal outcomes including retinal thickness as well as ganglion cell survival were compared to a control group of mice with experimental vein occlusion only. PLX5622 caused dramatic suppression of microglia. Despite vein occlusion, reappearance of green fluorescent protein positive cells was strongly impeded with continuous PLX5622 treatment and significantly delayed after its cessation. In depleted mice, retinal proinflammatory cytokine signaling was diminished and retinal ganglion cell survival improved by almost 50% compared to nondepleted animals 3 weeks after vein occlusion. Optical coherence tomography suggested delayed retinal degeneration in depleted mice. In summary, findings indicate that suppression of cells bearing the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor, mainly microglia and monocytes, mitigates ischemic damage and salvages retinal ganglion cells. Blood-retina barrier breakdown seems central in the disease mechanism, and complex interactions between different cell types composing the blood-retina barrier as well as sustained hypoxia might explain why the protective effect was only partial.Entities:
Keywords: blood-retina barrier; inflammation; ischemia; microglia; receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; retinal ganglion cell; retinal vein occlusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652020 PMCID: PMC7003783 DOI: 10.1002/glia.23739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glia ISSN: 0894-1491 Impact factor: 7.452
Figure 1Monitoring of retinal microglia depletion by in vivo confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. (a) There is quick and sustained suppression of microglia with PLX5622 treatment. (b) Representative images of microglia depletion kinetics. Pictures were taken in blue‐light autofluorescence mode using a 102° ultra‐widefield optic at baseline, 7d, 14d, and 21d, ****p < .0001 (Dunnett's multiple comparison test)
Figure 2Schematic representation of treatment regimen in the three experimental groups and representative in vivo fundus images at baseline and 3 weeks after induction of eBRVO. (a) Animals in the first group were continuously fed with PLX5622 diet (BRVO + PLX5622). Infiltration of GFP+ cells around the optic nerve and targeted blood vessels. (b) In the second group, chow was switched to control diet after induction of retinal vein occlusion (BRVO + Microglia Recovery). In addition to changes visible in the first group, dense repopulation of the retina is noted after 3 weeks. (c) In the third group, eBRVO was induced and mice were continuously kept on control diet (BRVO). Pathologic changes and density of GFP+ cells are similar to those in the second group [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Retinal thickness changes in (a) occluded and (b) nonoccluded retinal areas after experimental retinal vein occlusion. Thinning is partially prevented in animals with continuous depletion. Two‐way ANOVA confirms that PLX5622 treatment has a significant effect in ischemic retina (p = .0007)
Mean retinal thickness (μm) was measured in the occluded and nonoccluded areas of retinas
| Mean retinal thickness | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occluded area | Nonoccluded area | |||||||||||
| BRVO + PLX5622 | BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO | BRVO + PLX56622 versus BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO + PLX562 versus BRVO | BRVO + microglia recovery versus BRVO | BRVO + PLX5622 | BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO | BRVO + PLX5622 versus BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO + PLX5622 versus BRVO | BRVO + microglia recovery versus BRVO | |
| Mean retinal thickness ± |
|
|
| Mean retinal thickness ± |
|
|
| |||||
| 1w | 209.08 ± 9.88 | 223.58 ± 14.12 | 174.72 ± 6.57 | .4637 | .0736 | .0112* | 208.00 ± 5.73 | 209.83 ± 3.98 | 190.49 ± 5.54 | .9789 | .3053 | .2853 |
| 10% | 4% | 25% | 10% | 10% | 18% | |||||||
| 2w | 152.58 ± 5.22 | 111.37 ± 8.81 | 100.28 ± 13.89 | .0211* | .0121* | .7860 | 173.25 ± 5.61 | 154.92 ± 11.19 | 144.70 ± 20.35 | .2591 | .0984 | .7025 |
| 34% | 52% | 57% | 25% | 33% | 38% | |||||||
| 3w | 132.37 ± 4.44 | 110.74 ± 5.59 | 104.49 ± 6.88 | .2902 | .2223 | .9307 | 167.25 ± 4.39 | 179.8 ± 10.25 | 168.34 ± 7.10 | .4851 | .9960 | .6595 |
| 43% | 52% | 55% | 28% | 22% | 27% | |||||||
Note: Measurements were taken for each experimental group (BRVO + PLX5622, BRVO + Microglia Recovery, BRVO) in both areas of the same retina (occluded and nonoccluded) at each time point (n baseline = 46, n treatment = 3–10 eyes/group and time point). Percental change compared to naïve control mice (n = 4) is indicated below each measurement. Two‐way ANOVA with factors "treatment" (groups) and "time" was calculated for each area (see Figure 3 for results). This table also shows p‐values for post‐hoc analysis using Tukey's multiple comparison test between groups at each time point for each area. Results are given as mean ± SEM, *p < .05.
Figure 4Retinal ganglion cells are partially salvaged in PLX5622 treated mice. Two‐way ANOVA confirms that treatment affords significant protection in the ischemic retina
The retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival index was defined as the relative density of Brn3a+ RGCs in the occluded area relative to the nonoccluded area of retinal flat mounts after experimental branch vein occlusion
| RGC survival index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRVO + PLX5622 | BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO | BRVO + PLX5622 versus BRVO + microglia recovery | BRVO + PLX5622 versus BRVO | BRVO + microglia recovery versus BRVO | |
| RGC survival index |
|
|
| |||
| 1w | 0.762 ± 0.031 | 0.600 ± 0.101 | 0.690 ± 0.079 | .0294* | .6425 | .5511 |
| 2w | 0.725 ± 0.093 | 0.574 ± 0.048 | 0.423 ± 0.070 | .1147 | .0053** | .1714 |
| 3w | 0.643 ± 0.056 | 0.508 ± 0.081 | 0.431 ± 0.138 | .1695 | .0434* | .6647 |
Note: Two‐way ANOVA with factors “treatment” (groups) and “time” was used (see Figure 4 for results). This table shows actual RGC survival indices and p‐values for post‐hoc analysis using Tukey's multiple comparison between groups at each time point. Results are given as mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01.
Figure 6Semiquantitative grading of microglia repopulation in (a) occluded and (b) nonoccluded retina. (c) Analysis for all animals with cessation of treatment at time of laser (BRVO + Microglia Recovery) and (d) control mice. Templates used for grading are shown in (e). P‐Values are shown for two‐way ANOVA with factors “treatment” and “time.” *p < .05, **p < .01, p < .001, ****p < .0001 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 7Results from mouse cytokine antibody microarray for a selection of (a) proinflammatory and (b) anti‐inflammatory proteins. Significance levels: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, ****p < .0001; ♦: expression level below detection threshold (0.1 pg/ml)