| Literature DB >> 31651254 |
Sebastián Moschen1,2,3, Johanna Marino4, Salvador Nicosia2,3, Janet Higgins5, Saleh Alseekh6, Francisco Astigueta2,3, Sofia Bengoa Luoni7, Máximo Rivarola2,3, Alisdair R Fernie6, Nicolas Blanchet8, Nicolas B Langlade8, Norma Paniego2,3, Paula Fernández9,10,11, Ruth A Heinz2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leaf senescence is a complex process, controlled by multiple genetic and environmental variables. In sunflower, leaf senescence is triggered abruptly following anthesis thereby limiting the capacity of plants to keep their green leaf area during grain filling, which subsequently has a strong impact on crop yield. Recently, we performed a selection of contrasting sunflower inbred lines for the progress of leaf senescence through a physiological, cytological and molecular approach. Here we present a large scale transcriptomic analysis using RNA-seq and its integration with metabolic profiles for two contrasting sunflower inbred lines, R453 and B481-6 (early and delayed senescence respectively), with the aim of identifying metabolic pathways associated to leaf senescence.Entities:
Keywords: Candidate genes; Functional genomics; Leaf senescence; Sunflower; System biology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31651254 PMCID: PMC6813990 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2021-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Physiological measurements of senescence progress during field experiment at INTA Castelar, Argentina. a Leaf area; b Interception radiation index in the canopy; c Chlorophyll content of leaf 15; d Quantum yield of photosystem II of leaf 15; e Photosyntesis rate of leaf 15. Orange and green dots represent R453 and B481–6 line respectively. Tendency lines are in polynomic function. The red line indicates anthesis time. Error bars correspond to standard errors. °CdAE indicate thermal time (°C days After Emergence)
Fig. 2Physiological measurements of senescence progress during field experiment at Heliaphen Platform, INRA Toulouse, France. a Ratio of senescence leaf number vs. total leaf number; b - d Dualex measurement of chlorophyll content index (b), anthocyanin content index (c) and Nitrogen Balance Index (d). Orange and green dots represent R453 and B481–6 line respectively. Tendency lines are in polynomial function. The red line indicates anthesis time. Error bars correspond to standard errors. DAS: Days After Sowing
Fig. 3Venn diagram of differential expressed genes. 1101 and 648 genes were deferentially expressed in R453 and B481–6 respectively at Post-anthesis vs. Anthesis time
Fig. 4Metabolism overview using Mapman. Post-anthesis vs. Anthesis in a early senescence line (R453), and b delayed senescence line (B481–6). Genes and metabolites are represented by squares and circles, respectively. Colour intensity corresponds to the expression ratio at logarithmic scale (log2). Red: upregulated, blue: downregulated
Fig. 5Transcription factor analysis of ethylene signalling pathway and the associated TFs families. The squares indicate the expression ratio at logarithmic scale (log2) of early (R453) vs. delayed senescence line (B481–6) at anthesis (A) and post-anthesis (PA). Asterisk indicate significant differences, p-adj < 0.05
Fig. 6Gene co-expression networks analysis (WGCNA). a upregulated TFs and b downregulated TFs at anthesis time, R453 vs. B481–6 with Log2 fold-change > 2 or < − 2. The nodes represent TFs and the edges represent connections between them. The node size and colour are related to the number of connections, large orange nodes represent highly connected hub genes (high degree), small blue nodes represent genes with few connections (low degree). Strong connections are visualized as wider lines