Literature DB >> 31650385

Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool.

Víctor Caquilpán P1, Gabriel Aros G1, Sebastián Elgueta A1, Rodrigo Díaz S1, Gonzalo Sepúlveda K1, Carlos Sierralta J2.   

Abstract

The integration of monitoring technologies in the last decades has been a key factor in the development of new ways to track air pollutants and supplementing the network of traditional monitoring systems. In this regard, the appearance of affordable and accurate sensor devices to monitor air quality has made possible to obtain relevant data about the state of the air, and moreover, eminent institutions are interested in promoting the use of novel and more affordable tools for air pollution, such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency and European institutions, within a new approach to environmental surveillance, known as Next Generation Compliance and Enforcement technologies. On other hand, in order to get more reliable measurements, the use of machine learning to support adjustment or calibration process has been used in some studies to improve the performance of monitoring devices. On this paper, led by a group of specialists of the Chilean Superintendence of Environment (henceforth, SMA from its Spanish initials), a first approach case study related to the convenience of the usage of low-cost devices in environmental enforcement will be presented. The study was made in the Metropolitan Region of Santiago and considers the spatial distribution of different particulate matter sensors in the region. Some aspects regarding communication and technical issues are presented as well as the main findings about their performance. Results illustrate that low-cost sensors, aided by machine learning algorithms, could provide a reliable enough general screening of particulate matter within a large city, constituting a valuable decision-making tool for environmental oversight, as well as a powerful preventive and deterrent approach for compliance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality monitoring; Air quality surveillance; Low-cost devices; Machine learning; Next Generation Compliance; Random forest

Year:  2019        PMID: 31650385     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7875-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  13 in total

Review 1.  The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring.

Authors:  Emily G Snyder; Timothy H Watkins; Paul A Solomon; Eben D Thoma; Ronald W Williams; Gayle S W Hagler; David Shelow; David A Hindin; Vasu J Kilaru; Peter W Preuss
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The design of cost-effective air quality monitoring networks.

Authors:  E E Pickett; R G Whiting
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring.

Authors:  Aakash C Rai; Prashant Kumar; Francesco Pilla; Andreas N Skouloudis; Silvana Di Sabatino; Carlo Ratti; Ansar Yasar; David Rickerby
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  High Efficiency, Transparent, Reusable, and Active PM2.5 Filters by Hierarchical Ag Nanowire Percolation Network.

Authors:  Seongmin Jeong; Hyunmin Cho; Seonggeun Han; Phillip Won; Habeom Lee; Sukjoon Hong; Junyeob Yeo; Jinhyeong Kwon; Seung Hwan Ko
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Evaluation of a CFD-based approach to estimate pollutant distribution within a real urban canopy by means of passive samplers.

Authors:  J L Santiago; R Borge; F Martin; D de la Paz; A Martilli; J Lumbreras; B Sanchez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?

Authors:  Nuria Castell; Franck R Dauge; Philipp Schneider; Matthias Vogt; Uri Lerner; Barak Fishbain; David Broday; Alena Bartonova
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  [Impact of Particulate Matter (PM 2,5 ) and children's hospitalizations for respiratory diseases. A case cross-over study].

Authors:  Patricia Matus C; Manuel Oyarzún G
Journal:  Rev Chil Pediatr       Date:  2019-04

8.  Temperature and Humidity Calibration of a Low-Cost Wireless Dust Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring.

Authors:  Hannaneh Hojaiji; Haik Kalantarian; Alex A T Bui; Christine E King; Majid Sarrafzadeh
Journal:  2017 IEEE Sens Appl Symp (SAS) (2017)       Date:  2017-04-12

9.  Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California.

Authors:  Anondo Mukherjee; Levi G Stanton; Ashley R Graham; Paul T Roberts
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor.

Authors:  Elena Austin; Igor Novosselov; Edmund Seto; Michael G Yost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Framework for the implementation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-based water distribution and management system.

Authors:  Ankit Anilkumar Maroli; Vaibhav S Narwane; Rakesh D Raut; Balkrishna E Narkhede
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile.

Authors:  Matías Tagle; Francisca Rojas; Felipe Reyes; Yeanice Vásquez; Fredrik Hallgren; Jenny Lindén; Dimitar Kolev; Ågot K Watne; Pedro Oyola
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.