PURPOSE: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the lethal form of the disease. Many groups have performed mutational or immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing in metastatic CRPC to identify treatment targets. However, the frequency with which mutational or IHC data have an impact on clinical decision making and the outcomes of molecularly guided therapy in CRPC are largely unknown. We report our institution's experience with mutational and IHC testing in patients with metastatic CRPC and its impact on clinical decision making and patient outcomes. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 59 patients with CRPC underwent metastatic tissue biopsies and were genotyped with a 37-cancer gene panel in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory. PTEN expression by IHC testing was also measured in 35 of these samples. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine whether the genomic information was acted upon and the outcome of patients whose treatment was guided by molecular testing. RESULTS: Forty-six of 59 patients with CRPC (78.0%) had biopsies with adequate tumor for mutational testing. Thirty-one of 46 subjects (67.4%) had mutations identified by sequencing. Of the 35 patients with CRPC whose biopsies were evaluated for PTEN expression by IHC testing, 13 had PTEN loss. Two patients had treatment on the basis of molecular testing, and one of these subjects had greater tumor control with molecularly guided therapy than his immediate prior therapy. CONCLUSION: Targeted sequencing and IHC can identify clinically informative molecular abnormalities in CRPC. Despite this, a small minority of patients in our series underwent therapies guided by mutational or IHC testing. Actionability of abnormalities identified in metastatic CRPC may be improved with access to clinical trials, insurance approval for unapproved uses of existing anticancer drugs, and larger gene sequencing panels that include more frequently mutated genes.
PURPOSE: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the lethal form of the disease. Many groups have performed mutational or immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing in metastatic CRPC to identify treatment targets. However, the frequency with which mutational or IHC data have an impact on clinical decision making and the outcomes of molecularly guided therapy in CRPC are largely unknown. We report our institution's experience with mutational and IHC testing in patients with metastatic CRPC and its impact on clinical decision making and patient outcomes. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 59 patients with CRPC underwent metastatic tissue biopsies and were genotyped with a 37-cancer gene panel in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory. PTEN expression by IHC testing was also measured in 35 of these samples. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine whether the genomic information was acted upon and the outcome of patients whose treatment was guided by molecular testing. RESULTS: Forty-six of 59 patients with CRPC (78.0%) had biopsies with adequate tumor for mutational testing. Thirty-one of 46 subjects (67.4%) had mutations identified by sequencing. Of the 35 patients with CRPC whose biopsies were evaluated for PTEN expression by IHC testing, 13 had PTEN loss. Two patients had treatment on the basis of molecular testing, and one of these subjects had greater tumor control with molecularly guided therapy than his immediate prior therapy. CONCLUSION: Targeted sequencing and IHC can identify clinically informative molecular abnormalities in CRPC. Despite this, a small minority of patients in our series underwent therapies guided by mutational or IHC testing. Actionability of abnormalities identified in metastatic CRPC may be improved with access to clinical trials, insurance approval for unapproved uses of existing anticancer drugs, and larger gene sequencing panels that include more frequently mutated genes.
Authors: Charles E Spritzer; P Diana Afonso; Emily N Vinson; James D Turnbull; Karla K Morris; Adam Foye; John F Madden; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Phillip G Febbo; Daniel J George Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Heather H Cheng; Nola Klemfuss; Bruce Montgomery; Celestia S Higano; Michael T Schweizer; Elahe A Mostaghel; Lisa G McFerrin; Evan Y Yu; Peter S Nelson; Colin C Pritchard Journal: Prostate Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Haley Hieronymus; Anuradha Gopalan; Yonghong Xiao; Brett S Carver; Vivek K Arora; Poorvi Kaushik; Ethan Cerami; Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Nicholas Mitsiades; Thomas Landers; Igor Dolgalev; John E Major; Manda Wilson; Nicholas D Socci; Alex E Lash; Adriana Heguy; James A Eastham; Howard I Scher; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Chris Sander; Charles L Sawyers; William L Gerald Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Keith T Flaherty; Igor Puzanov; Kevin B Kim; Antoni Ribas; Grant A McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Peter J O'Dwyer; Richard J Lee; Joseph F Grippo; Keith Nolop; Paul B Chapman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arun A Azad; Stanislav V Volik; Alexander W Wyatt; Anne Haegert; Stephane Le Bihan; Robert H Bell; Shawn A Anderson; Brian McConeghy; Robert Shukin; Jenny Bazov; Jack Youngren; Pamela Paris; George Thomas; Eric J Small; Yuzhuo Wang; Martin E Gleave; Colin C Collins; Kim N Chi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R R McKay; K A Zukotynski; L Werner; O Voznesensky; J S Wu; S E Smith; Z Jiang; K Melnick; X Yuan; P W Kantoff; B Montgomery; S P Balk; M-E Taplin Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Dan Robinson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Yi-Mi Wu; Nikolaus Schultz; Robert J Lonigro; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Bruce Montgomery; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Colin C Pritchard; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Wassim Abida; Robert K Bradley; Jake Vinson; Xuhong Cao; Pankaj Vats; Lakshmi P Kunju; Maha Hussain; Felix Y Feng; Scott A Tomlins; Kathleen A Cooney; David C Smith; Christine Brennan; Javed Siddiqui; Rohit Mehra; Yu Chen; Dana E Rathkopf; Michael J Morris; Stephen B Solomon; Jeremy C Durack; Victor E Reuter; Anuradha Gopalan; Jianjiong Gao; Massimo Loda; Rosina T Lis; Michaela Bowden; Stephen P Balk; Glenn Gaviola; Carrie Sougnez; Manaswi Gupta; Evan Y Yu; Elahe A Mostaghel; Heather H Cheng; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Lawrence D True; Stephen R Plymate; Heidi Dvinge; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Penny Flohr; Susana Miranda; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Nina Tunariu; Joaquin Mateo; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Francesca Demichelis; Brian D Robinson; Marc Schiffman; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Alexandros Sigaras; Kenneth W Eng; Olivier Elemento; Andrea Sboner; Elisabeth I Heath; Howard I Scher; Kenneth J Pienta; Philip Kantoff; Johann S de Bono; Mark A Rubin; Peter S Nelson; Levi A Garraway; Charles L Sawyers; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Brett S Carver; Caren Chapinski; John Wongvipat; Haley Hieronymus; Yu Chen; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Vivek K Arora; Carl Le; Jason Koutcher; Howard Scher; Peter T Scardino; Neal Rosen; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Joshi J Alumkal; Duanchen Sun; Eric Lu; Tomasz M Beer; George V Thomas; Emile Latour; Rahul Aggarwal; Jeremy Cetnar; Charles J Ryan; Shaadi Tabatabaei; Shawna Bailey; Claire B Turina; David A Quigley; Xiangnan Guan; Adam Foye; Jack F Youngren; Joshua Urrutia; Jiaoti Huang; Alana S Weinstein; Verena Friedl; Matthew Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Daniel E Spratt; Martin Gleave; Christopher P Evans; Joshua M Stuart; Yiyi Chen; Felix Y Feng; Eric J Small; Owen N Witte; Zheng Xia Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 11.205