| Literature DB >> 31650017 |
Sayed Mehran Sharafi1, Jean-Philippe Sylvestre2, Claudia Chevrefils2, Jean-Paul Soucy3, Sylvain Beaulieu4, Tharick A Pascoal5, Jean Daniel Arbour6, Marc-André Rhéaume6, Alain Robillard7, Céline Chayer7, Pedro Rosa-Neto8, Sulantha S Mathotaarachchi8, Ziad S Nasreddine9, Serge Gauthier10, Frédéric Lesage1,11.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the relationship between retinal image features and β-amyloid (Aβ) burden in the brain with the aim of developing a noninvasive method to predict the deposition of Aβ in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer; Beta amyloid; Image processing; Machine learning; Multispectral fundus imaging; Retina
Year: 2019 PMID: 31650017 PMCID: PMC6804547 DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ISSN: 2352-8737
Fig. 1Schematic of the metabolic hyperspectral retinal camera used for acquiring the images.
Fig. 2(A) Tortuosity measurement steps of a sample vessel segment. (B) Different zones of retina: zone A (region from 0 to 0.5 ONH diameters away from the ONH margin), zone B (region from 0.5 to 1 ONH diameters away from the ONH margin), and zone C (region from 0.5 to 2 ONH diameters away from the ONH margin).
Eight features chosen by sequential feature selection
| Feature code | Feature name | Anatomical region | Band(nm) | Direction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Tortuosity | Venules | - | - | 1.6e−6 |
| F2 | Diameter | Arterioles—zone A | - | - | .0104 |
| F3 | Contrast (texture) | Arterioles and around | 450–550 | Spectral | 1.05e−6 |
| F4 | Energy (texture) | Arterioles and around | 450–550 | Spectral | 9.6e−7 |
| F5 | Energy (texture) | Arterioles | 700–900 | Spectral | .0056 |
| F6 | Contrast (texture) | Arterioles and around | 450–550 | Spatial-spectral | 7.4e−5 |
| F7 | Correlation (texture) | Arterioles and around | 450–550 | Spatial-spectral | .0160 |
| F8 | Homogeneity (texture) | Arterioles and around | 450–550 | Spatial-spectral | 2.9e−5 |
NOTE. Anatomical regions, bands, directions in which features were extracted and Bonferroni-corrected P values are shown.
Fig. 3Difference between β-amyloid-positive and β-amyloid-negative data sets corresponding to features F1 (A) to F8 (H)—Data points are shown as normalized values.
Fig. 4(A) SVM classification loss using principal components 1 to 8 inclusively; (B) comparison of classification losses when using different types of features.
Comparing classification performance based on features used
| Features used | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasculature features (F1 and F2) | 0.74 ± 0.019 | 0.77 ± 0.006 | 0.49 ± 0.018 | 0.91 ± 0.007 | 0.76 ± 0.008 |
| Texture measures (F3 to F8) | 0.68 ± 0.022 | 0.76 ± 0.007 | 0.50 ± 0.019 | 0.87 ± 0.012 | 0.74 ± 0.010 |
| Combined (7 PCs of F1 to F8) | 0.82 ± 0.022 | 0.86 ± 0.011 | 0.73 ± 0.025 | 0.91 ± 0.011 | 0.85 ± 0.013 |
NOTE. Performance values were evaluated using different gold standards: cognitive tests (Cog.) and amyloid status (Aβ).
Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.