Literature DB >> 31646467

The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction.

Chad M Colon1, Ramey L Marshell2, Christopher P Roth2, Ayman A Farag2, Ami E Iskandrian2, Fadi G Hage2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the prognostic role of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI).
BACKGROUND: T2MI is an increasingly common diagnosis in clinical practice. The management of this condition is controversial and the prognostic value of MPI has not been established in this setting.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied T2MI patients who underwent vasodilator gated MPI within 90 days of T2MI at a single tertiary care institution in 2013. Abnormal myocardial perfusion was defined as the perfusion defect involving ≥ 5% of left ventricular (LV) myocardium. Abnormal LV ejection fraction (EF) was defined as < 50% by gated images. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (other than index event) or coronary revascularization (CR).
RESULTS: There were 234 patients (62 ± 14 years, 57% men) with T2MI (peak troponin 0.2 ng/ml, interquartile 0.1-1.4), of whom 136 (58%) had an abnormal MPI. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 155 patients (66%) had the primary outcome (39% death, 42% MI, 5% CR). An abnormal MPI was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome with a hazard ratio of 1.56, 95%CI (1.12-2.18, P = .008) that remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustment (1.45, 95%CI (1.02-2.06, P = .04))).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2MI are at high risk for death or cardiac events in the intermediate term. More than one-half of patients with T2MI have an abnormal MPI and this is associated with the increased risk of cardiac events during follow-up. Risk stratification with MPI after T2MI may identify patients who would benefit from aggressive risk reduction.
© 2019. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Type 2 myocardial infarction; myocardial perfusion imaging; troponin

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31646467     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01915-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  1 in total

1.  Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  G Germano; H Kiat; P B Kavanagh; M Moriel; M Mazzanti; H T Su; K F Van Train; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the prevalence and predicting factors of an abnormal gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E Hosseinzadeh; Mohammadali Ghodsirad; T Alirezaie; M Arfenia; M Amoui; E Pirayesh; G Norouzi; S Khoshbakht
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  How should we manage the patients with type 2 myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Kazuya Takehana
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Stress testing and myocardial perfusion imaging for patients after recovery from severe COVID-19 infection requiring hospitalization: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Usman A Hasnie; Riem Hawi; Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.952

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.