Literature DB >> 31644986

Findings of a national dataset analysis on the visits of homeless patients to US emergency departments during 2005-2015.

K Lombardi1, J M Pines2, M Mazer-Amirshahi3, A Pourmand4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge, there has been limited description of emergency department (ED) visits involving homeless patients over the last decade. Our study aims to analyze US national survey data to elucidate the differences between homeless and non-homeless patients' ED visits in terms of patient demographics, resource utilization, and diagnoses received. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2005 until 2015.
METHODS: Patient visits were classified as homeless or non-homeless based on survey data; appropriate statistical analyses were subsequently performed to compare these groups in terms of patient demographics, geography, payment method, resource utilization/diagnostic service use, as well as both psychiatric and non-psychiatric diagnoses received in the ED.
RESULTS: NHAMCS data from 2005 to 2015 were aggregated. In total, 303,326 patient visits were included, which represent an estimated 1.30 billion ED visits over this period. Of these, 2750 encounters were by homeless people, representing 8,781,925 ED visits. Compared with non-homeless visits, homeless patients were disproportionately male, black, non-Hispanic, and seen in large metropolitan areas or the Western/Southern US. Homeless visits were more likely to be related to an injury (47.5% vs. 33.8%), related to an assault (4.2% vs. 1.3%), or self-inflicted (4.8% vs 0.84%). Homeless patients were also more likely to have been seen in the same ED within 72 h (7.3% vs. 3.9%) compared with non-homeless patients (3.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.5-4.4) and were seen an average of 5.7 times (95% CI: 4.7-6.8) in the same ED over the preceding 12 months, with non-homeless patients seen an average of 3.2 times (95% CI: 3.1-3.4). Homeless patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (14.9% vs. 11.2%) and, when admitted, spent an average of 6.3 days in the hospital (95% CI: 5.6-7.1) compared with non-homeless patients at 5.2 (95% CI: 5.1-5.3). In total, 28.4% of homeless patients received a psychiatric diagnosis (95% CI: 25.8-31.2) compared with 5.4% for non-homeless patients (95% CI: 5.2-5.7, P < 0.001). In reference to non-homeless visits, homeless visits showed increased odds of alcohol-related diagnoses (odds ratio [OR]: 17.3, 95% CI: 10.1-29.8, P < 0.001) and substance abuse diagnoses (OR: 8.4, 95% CI: 7.2-9.8, P < 0.001). Homeless visits also exhibited greatly increased odds of diagnosis of schizophrenia (OR: 16.6, 95% CI: 12.6-22.5, P < 0.001) and personality disorders (OR: 15.4, 95% CI: 6.4-36.9, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Less than one in 100 US ED visits in 2005-2015 were made by homeless patients. Compared with the non-homeless, homeless patients had greatly increased rates of ED care for alcohol-related, substance abuse-related, and mental health-related problems, particularly schizophrenia and personality disorders. Homeless patients were also more likely to be seen in the ED within the past 72 h or the past 12 months. Homeless patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital and, when admitted, exhibited longer stay times.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol abuse; Emergency department; Homeless; Schizophrenia; Substance abuse

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31644986     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  8 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Hospital Readmission Among Patients Experiencing Homelessness.

Authors:  Keshab Subedi; Binod Acharya; Shweta Ghimire
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.604

2.  Dedicated homeless clinics reduce inappropriate emergency department utilization.

Authors:  Chad T Holmes; Katherine A Holmes; Andrew MacDonald; Frank R Lonergan; Joel J Hunt; Sajid Shaikh; Radhika Cheeti; James P D'Etienne; Nestor R Zenarosa; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-04-15

3.  Comorbidity profiles of patients experiencing homelessness: A latent class analysis.

Authors:  Keshab Subedi; Shweta Ghimire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  A retrospective analysis of the health and social situation of homeless people in Berlin: study protocol.

Authors:  Sonia Lech; Liane Schenk; Jenny De la Torre Castro; Daniel Schindel
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2021-03-06

Review 5.  A Scoping Review of Current Social Emergency Medicine Research.

Authors:  Ruhee Shah; Alessandra Della Porta; Sherman Leung; Margaret Samuels-Kalow; Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Lynne D Richardson; Michelle P Lin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 6.  Homelessness and the use of Emergency Department as a source of healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Neha Vohra; Vibhu Paudyal; Malcolm J Price
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-28

7.  Characterization of dermatological diagnoses among hospitalized patients experiencing homelessness.

Authors:  A Zakaria; E H Amerson; P Kim-Lim; L Fox; A Y Chang
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.470

8.  Smartphone Technology to Empower People Experiencing Homelessness: Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Whitney Thurman; Monika Semwal; Leticia R Moczygemba; Mark Hilbelink
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.