PURPOSE: Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare and aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. This study was undertaken to evaluate the immunogenicity of ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced ACC were enrolled in a phase II study to evaluate the clinical activity of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, without restriction on prior therapy. The primary end point was objective response rate. Efficacy was correlated with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high and/or mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/MMR-D) status, and somatic and germline genomic correlates. RESULTS: We enrolled 39 patients with advanced ACC and herein report after a median follow-up of 17.8 months (range, 5.4 months to 34.7 months). The objective response rate to pembrolizumab was 23% (nine patients; 95% CI, 11% to 39%), and the disease control rate was 52% (16 patients; 95% CI, 33% to 69%). The median duration of response was not reached (lower 95% CI, 4.1 months). Two of six patients with MSI-H/MMR-D tumors responded. The other seven patients with objective responses had microsatellite stable tumors. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0 months to 10.7 months), and the median overall survival was 24.9 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not reached). Thirteen percent of patients (n = 5) had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression and MSI-H/MMR-D status were not associated with objective response. CONCLUSION: MSI-H/MMR-D tumors, for which pembrolizumab is a standard therapy, are more common in ACC than has been recognized. In advanced ACC that is microsatellite stable, pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile.
PURPOSE:Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare and aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. This study was undertaken to evaluate the immunogenicity of ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced ACC were enrolled in a phase II study to evaluate the clinical activity of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, without restriction on prior therapy. The primary end point was objective response rate. Efficacy was correlated with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high and/or mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/MMR-D) status, and somatic and germline genomic correlates. RESULTS: We enrolled 39 patients with advanced ACC and herein report after a median follow-up of 17.8 months (range, 5.4 months to 34.7 months). The objective response rate to pembrolizumab was 23% (nine patients; 95% CI, 11% to 39%), and the disease control rate was 52% (16 patients; 95% CI, 33% to 69%). The median duration of response was not reached (lower 95% CI, 4.1 months). Two of six patients with MSI-H/MMR-D tumors responded. The other seven patients with objective responses had microsatellite stable tumors. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0 months to 10.7 months), and the median overall survival was 24.9 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not reached). Thirteen percent of patients (n = 5) had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression and MSI-H/MMR-D status were not associated with objective response. CONCLUSION: MSI-H/MMR-D tumors, for which pembrolizumab is a standard therapy, are more common in ACC than has been recognized. In advanced ACC that is microsatellite stable, pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile.
Authors: M J Berends; A Cats; H Hollema; A Karrenbeld; J A Beentjes; R H Sijmons; R G Mensink; R M Hofstra; R C Verschueren; J H Kleibeuker Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Dung T Le; Jennifer N Uram; Hao Wang; Bjarne R Bartlett; Holly Kemberling; Aleksandra D Eyring; Andrew D Skora; Brandon S Luber; Nilofer S Azad; Dan Laheru; Barbara Biedrzycki; Ross C Donehower; Atif Zaheer; George A Fisher; Todd S Crocenzi; James J Lee; Steven M Duffy; Richard M Goldberg; Albert de la Chapelle; Minori Koshiji; Feriyl Bhaijee; Thomas Huebner; Ralph H Hruban; Laura D Wood; Nathan Cuka; Drew M Pardoll; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Shibin Zhou; Toby C Cornish; Janis M Taube; Robert A Anders; James R Eshleman; Bert Vogelstein; Luis A Diaz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nikhil Wagle; Caroline Emery; Michael F Berger; Matthew J Davis; Allison Sawyer; Panisa Pochanard; Sarah M Kehoe; Cory M Johannessen; Laura E Macconaill; William C Hahn; Matthew Meyerson; Levi A Garraway Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yevgeniy Karamurzin; Zhaoshi Zeng; Zsofia K Stadler; Liying Zhang; Ihsane Ouansafi; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Christine Sempoux; Leonard B Saltz; Robert A Soslow; Eileen M O'Reilly; Philip B Paty; Daniel G Coit; Jinru Shia; David S Klimstra Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Victoria M Raymond; Jessica N Everett; Larissa V Furtado; Shanna L Gustafson; Chelsy R Jungbluth; Stephen B Gruber; Gary D Hammer; Elena M Stoffel; Joel K Greenson; Thomas J Giordano; Tobias Else Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nikhil Wagle; Michael F Berger; Matthew J Davis; Brendan Blumenstiel; Matthew Defelice; Panisa Pochanard; Matthew Ducar; Paul Van Hummelen; Laura E Macconaill; William C Hahn; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey B Gabriel; Levi A Garraway Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Andreas Gnirke; Alexandre Melnikov; Jared Maguire; Peter Rogov; Emily M LeProust; William Brockman; Timothy Fennell; Georgia Giannoukos; Sheila Fisher; Carsten Russ; Stacey Gabriel; David B Jaffe; Eric S Lander; Chad Nusbaum Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christophe Le Tourneau; Christopher Hoimes; Corrine Zarwan; Deborah J Wong; Sebastian Bauer; Rainer Claus; Martin Wermke; Subramanian Hariharan; Anja von Heydebreck; Vijay Kasturi; Vikram Chand; James L Gulley Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Nikita Pozdeyev; Lauren Fishbein; Laurie M Gay; Ethan S Sokol; Ryan Hartmaier; Jeffrey S Ross; Sourat Darabi; Michael J Demeure; Adwitiya Kar; Lindsey J Foust; Katrina Koc; Daniel W Bowles; Stephen Leong; Margaret E Wierman; Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 5.900
Authors: Marilyne Daher; Jeena Varghese; Stephen K Gruschkus; Camilo Jimenez; Steven G Waguespack; Sara Bedrose; Lina Altameemi; Hadil Bazerbashi; Aung Naing; Vivek Subaiah; Matthew T Campbell; Amishi Y Shah; Miao Zhang; Rahul A Sheth; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Nancy D Perrier; Paul H Graham; Jeffery E Lee; Mouhammed Amir Habra Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Mark D Krailo; Emilia M Pinto; Farzana Pashankar; Christopher B Weldon; Li Huang; Eliana M Caran; John Hicks; M Beth McCarville; David Malkin; Jonathan D Wasserman; Antonio G de Oliveira Filho; Michael P LaQuaglia; Deborah A Ward; Gerard Zambetti; Maria J Mastellaro; Alberto S Pappo; Raul C Ribeiro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Jean-Michel Lavoie; Veronika Csizmok; Laura M Williamson; Luka Culibrk; Gang Wang; Marco A Marra; Janessa Laskin; Steven J M Jones; Daniel J Renouf; Christian K Kollmannsberger Journal: Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: João C D Muzzi; Jessica M Magno; Milena A Cardoso; Juliana de Moura; Mauro A A Castro; Bonald C Figueiredo Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 5.555