Literature DB >> 22306565

Bayesian posterior distributions without Markov chains.

Stephen R Cole1, Haitao Chu, Sander Greenland, Ghassan Hamra, David B Richardson.   

Abstract

Bayesian posterior parameter distributions are often simulated using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. However, MCMC methods are not always necessary and do not help the uninitiated understand Bayesian inference. As a bridge to understanding Bayesian inference, the authors illustrate a transparent rejection sampling method. In example 1, they illustrate rejection sampling using 36 cases and 198 controls from a case-control study (1976-1983) assessing the relation between residential exposure to magnetic fields and the development of childhood cancer. Results from rejection sampling (odds ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% posterior interval (PI): 0.57, 5.00) were similar to MCMC results (OR = 1.69, 95% PI: 0.58, 4.95) and approximations from data-augmentation priors (OR = 1.74, 95% PI: 0.60, 5.06). In example 2, the authors apply rejection sampling to a cohort study of 315 human immunodeficiency virus seroconverters (1984-1998) to assess the relation between viral load after infection and 5-year incidence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, adjusting for (continuous) age at seroconversion and race. In this more complex example, rejection sampling required a notably longer run time than MCMC sampling but remained feasible and again yielded similar results. The transparency of the proposed approach comes at a price of being less broadly applicable than MCMC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22306565      PMCID: PMC3282880          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  12 in total

1.  Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods.

Authors:  Paul Marjoram; John Molitor; Vincent Plagnol; Simon Tavare
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Generalized conjugate priors for Bayesian analysis of risk and survival regressions.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Effectiveness of highly-active antiretroviral therapy by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Michael J Silverberg; Scott A Wegner; Mark J Milazzo; Rosemary G McKaig; Carolyn F Williams; Brian K Agan; Adam W Armstrong; Stephen J Gange; Clifton Hawkes; Robert J O'Connell; Sunil K Ahuja; Matthew J Dolan
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Models for the incubation of AIDS and variations according to age and period.

Authors:  A Muñoz; J Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996 Nov 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group.

Authors:  S Greenland; A R Sheppard; W T Kaune; C Poole; M A Kelsh
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Long-term effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy in preventing AIDS and death: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Bruno Ledergerber; Kate Tilling; Rainer Weber; Pedram Sendi; Martin Rickenbach; James M Robins; Matthias Egger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 30-Aug 5       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: rationale, organization, and selected characteristics of the participants.

Authors:  R A Kaslow; D G Ostrow; R Detels; J P Phair; B F Polk; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields.

Authors:  D A Savitz; H Wachtel; F A Barnes; E M John; J G Tvrdik
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  8 in total

1.  Breast cancer subtypes and previously established genetic risk factors: a bayesian approach.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Lawrence S Engel; Jeannette T Bensen; Charles Poole; Amy H Herring; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Andreas Stang; Charles Poole
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists.

Authors:  Ghassan Hamra; Richard MacLehose; David Richardson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Sensitivity analyses for sparse-data problems-using weakly informative bayesian priors.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Richard F MacLehose; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Estimating multiple time-fixed treatment effects using a semi-Bayes semiparametric marginal structural Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Jessie K Edwards; Daniel Westreich; Catherine R Lesko; Bryan Lau; Michael J Mugavero; W Christopher Mathews; Joseph J Eron; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Risk factors for Echinococcus coproantigen positivity in dogs from the Alay valley, Kyrgyzstan.

Authors:  A Mastin; F van Kesteren; P R Torgerson; I Ziadinov; B Mytynova; M T Rogan; T Tursunov; P S Craig
Journal:  J Helminthol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.170

7.  Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.

Authors:  Kirsty M Rhodes; Rebecca M Turner; Ian R White; Dan Jackson; David J Spiegelhalter; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A maximum likelihood algorithm for reconstructing 3D structures of human chromosomes from chromosomal contact data.

Authors:  Oluwatosin Oluwadare; Yuxiang Zhang; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.