| Literature DB >> 31640813 |
Shuaimin Chen1,2, Tatoba R Waghmode1, Ruibo Sun1, Eiko E Kuramae3, Chunsheng Hu4, Binbin Liu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant roots assemble microbial communities both inside the roots and in the rhizosphere, and these root-associated microbiomes play pivotal roles in plant nutrition and productivity. Although it is known that increased synthetic fertilizer input in Chinese farmlands over the past 50 years has resulted in not only increased yields but also environmental problems, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how crops under elevated nutrient input shape root-associated microbial communities, especially through adjusting the quantities and compositions of root metabolites and exudates.Entities:
Keywords: Nitrogen fertilization; Organic acid; Plant growth stage; Root exudate; Root-associated microbiomes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640813 PMCID: PMC6806522 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0750-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Soil active carbon (a), soil organic carbon (b), root-released organic carbon (c) and organic acids (d) in the four different N fertilization levels at three growth stages. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between the N fertilization levels at each growth stage
Fig. 2Bacterial community composition of the rhizosphere (a) and root (b) samples at the phylum level. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial communities in the rhizosphere (c) and root (e) samples. Dissimilarity distance showing the differences in microbial community structure across the growth stages in the rhizosphere (d) and root (f) samples. PCoA and dissimilarity distance were based on Bray-Curtis distance at the OTU level
Bacterial and fungal community variance explained by various carbon pools according to redundancy analysis (RDA)
| Carbon pool | Explained variance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||
| Rhizosphere | Root | Rhizosphere | Root | |
| ROC | 19.0%*** | 12.7%*** | - | - |
| SAC | - | 7.3%* | 12.6%* | 11.3%* |
| SOC | - | 7.7%* | 14.8%* | - |
Significance level: P< 0.05, *; P< 0.01, **; P< 0.001, ***. ROC: root-released organic carbon; SAC: soil active carbon; SOC: soil organic carbon.
The analysis was performed at the OTU level
Correlations between bacterial and fungal communities and root organic acids and carbon pools in the rhizosphere and roots
| Carbon pool | Bacteria | Fungi | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhizosphere | Root | Rhizosphere | Root | |||||
| r | r | r | r | |||||
| Acetic acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| Oxalic acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| Succinic acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| Malic acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| Tartaric acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| Citric acid | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
| ROC |
|
|
|
| - | - | - | - |
| SAC |
|
|
|
| - | - |
|
|
| SOC | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - |
The Mantel test was performed using the Pearson correlation method. Carbon pools were calculated based on the Euclidean distance, and the microbial community structures (OTU level) were calculated based on the Bray-Curtis distance. P is the significance level. Values with P<0.05 are shown. ROC: root-released organic carbon; SAC: soil active carbon; SOC: soil organic carbon
Fig. 3Heatmap of the dominant bacterial orders (left) and Pearson correlation analysis between the dominant bacterial orders and organic acids (right) in the rhizosphere (a) and root (b) samples. The results at the genus level are presented in the Additional file 1: Figures S4 and S5. NA indicates no significant correlation (P > 0.05)
Fig. 4Fungal community composition of the rhizosphere (a) and root (b) samples. PCoA of the fungal communities in the rhizosphere (c) and root (e) samples. Dissimilarity distance in the rhizosphere (d) and root (f) samples. PcoA and dissimilarity distance were based on Bray-Curtis distance at the OTU level
Number of correlations between bacterial and fungal genera in the rhizosphere and root samples
| Correlation coefficient | Number of correlations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhizosphere | Root | ||||||
| Tillering | Jointing | Ripening | Tillering | Jointing | Ripening | ||
r≥ 0.57 ( | Positive | 72 | 41 | 47 | 52 | 61 | 59 |
| Negative | 51 | 41 | 53 | 54 | 67 | 71 | |
| Sum | 123 | 82 | 100 | 106 | 128 | 130 | |
r ≥ 0.65 ( | Positive | 27 | 20 | 21 | 27 | 45 | 36 |
| Negative | 39 | 16 | 30 | 32 | 41 | 42 | |
| Sum | 66 | 36 | 51 | 59 | 86 | 78 | |
r ≥ 0.75 ( | Positive | 12 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 7 |
| Negative | 14 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 18 | 12 | |
| Sum | 26 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 35 | 19 | |
Fig. 5Correlation pattern of the dominant (relative abundance > 1%) bacterial and fungal genera in rhizosphere (a) and root (b) samples at three growth stages (tillering, jointing and ripening). Statistical significance was determined for all pairwise comparisons using Spearman’s method; only significant correlations, either positive (blue squares) or negative (red squares) (p value < 0.05), are displayed