| Literature DB >> 31640780 |
Zijun Y Xu-Monette1,2, Jianyong Li2, Yi Xia2, Beryl Crossley3, Robert D Bremel4, Yi Miao2, Min Xiao2, Thomas Snyder3, Ganiraju C Manyam5, Xiaohong Tan2, Hongwei Zhang2, Carlo Visco6, Alexandar Tzankov7, Karen Dybkaer8, Govind Bhagat9, Wayne Tam10, Hua You11, Eric D Hsi12, J Han van Krieken13, Jooryung Huh14, Maurilio Ponzoni15, Andrés J M Ferreri15, Michael B Møller16, Miguel A Piris17, Jane N Winter18, Jeffrey T Medeiros2, Bing Xu19, Yong Li20, Ilan Kirsch3, Ken H Young21,22,23.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) harbors somatic hypermutation (SHM) in the immunoglobulin heavy chain and light chain variable region genes, IGHV and IGK/LV. Recent studies have revealed that IGV SHM creates neoantigens that activate T-cell responses against B-cell lymphoma.Entities:
Keywords: 9p.24; BCL2; DLBCL; HLA; Immunoglobulin; MHC; NGS; Neoantigen; PD-1; SHM
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640780 PMCID: PMC6806565 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0730-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 13.751
Fig. 1Immunoglobulin heavy chain analysis. a A high degree of IGHV SHM (SHMhigh) was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS) in DLBCL overall and in DLBCL lacking BCL2 rearrangement (BCL2-R−) or MYC rearrangement (MYC-R−). b IGHV SHMhigh was associated with significantly better OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in the training set, and significantly better OS in the BCL2-R− cases of the validation set. c Short heavy chain complementarity determining region 3 (HCDR3) length was associated with significantly better OS in the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB)-DLBCL and overall DLBCL
Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of patients with DLBCL with a low or high degree of SHM in immunoglobulin variable region genes
| IGHV SHMlow | IGHV SHMhigh |
| IGK/LV SHMlow | IGK/LV SHMhigh |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Age | ||||||
| < 60 years | 32 (44%) | 25 (36%) | .31 | 66 (40%) | 14 (37%) | .72 |
| ≥ 60 years | 40 (56%) | 45 (64%) | 97 (60%) | 24 (63%) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 35 (49%) | 41 (59%) | .24 | 94 (58%) | 26 (68%) | .27 |
| Female | 37 (51%) | 29 (41%) | 69 (42%) | 12 (32%) | ||
| Stage | ||||||
| I - II | 29 (43%) | 34 (52%) | .39 | 72 (46%) | 14 (39%) | .58 |
| III - IV | 39 (57%) | 32 (48%) | 86 (54%) | 22 (61%) | ||
| B symptoms | ||||||
| No | 38 (56%) | 43 (63%) | .48 | 103 (66%) | 28 (78%) | .23 |
| Yes | 30 (44%) | 25 (37%) | 53 (34%) | 8 (22%) | ||
| Serum LDH level | ||||||
| Normal | 21 (33%) | 29 (45%) | .20 | 67 (46%) | 18 (55%) | .44 |
| Elevated | 43 (67%) | 35 (55%) | 78 (54%) | 15 (45%) | ||
| No. of extranodal sites | ||||||
| 0 or 1 | 51 (76%) | 53 (82%) | .53 | 126 (81%) | 26 (70%) | .18 |
| ≥ 2 | 16 (24%) | 12 (18%) | 30 (19%) | 11 (30%) | ||
| ECOG performance status | ||||||
| 0 or 1 | 47 (80%) | 44 (76%) | .66 | 113 (79%) | 26 (81%) | 1.0 |
| ≥ 2 | 12 (20%) | 14 (24%) | 30 (21%) | 6 (19%) | ||
| Largest tumor size | ||||||
| < 5 cm | 37 (66%) | 27 (53%) | .17 | 73 (57%) | 13 (43%) | .22 |
| ≥ 5 cm | 19 (34%) | 24 (47%) | 55 (43%) | 17 (57%) | ||
| IPI score | ||||||
| 0–2 | 40 (60%) | 42 (64%) | .72 | 97 (62%) | 21 (57%) | .58 |
| 3–5 | 27 (40%) | 24 (36%) | 60 (38%) | 16 (43%) | ||
| Therapy response | ||||||
| CR | 51 (71%) | 54 (77%) | .45* | 126 (77%) | 27 (73%) | .67* |
| PR | 10 | 8 | 21 | 3 | ||
| SD | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | ||
| PD | 9 | 5 | 12 | 6 | ||
| ABC subtype/ABC subtype | ||||||
| GCB | 27 (39%) | 39 (53%) | .094 | 78 (47%) | 21 (57%) | .36 |
| ABC | 43 (61%) | 34 (47%) | 88 (53%) | 16 (43%) | ||
| BAGS classification | ||||||
| CC/CB | 24 (52%) | 40 (75%) |
| 77 (64%) | 21 (81%) | .11 |
| Others | 22 (48%) | 13 (25%) | 43 (36%) | 5 (19%) | ||
| No | 55 (87%) | 46 (72%) |
| 125 (81%) | 22 (65%) |
|
| Yes | 8 (13%) | 18 (28%) | 29 (19%) | 12 (35%) | ||
| MYC expression | ||||||
| < 70% | 39 (57%) | 50 (72%) |
| 117 (72%) | 26 (68%) | .69 |
| ≥ 70% | 29 (43%) | 19 (28%) | 46 (28%) | 12 (32%) | ||
| PI3K expression | ||||||
| < 70% | 43 (67%) | 50 (75%) | .44 | 112 (72%) | 14 (42%) |
|
| ≥ 70% | 21 (33%) | 17 (25%) | 43 (28%) | 19 (58%) | ||
| p63 expression | ||||||
| < 10% | 47 (68%) | 38 (54%) | .086 | 93 (59%) | 14 (39%) |
|
| ≥ 10% | 22 (32%) | 33 (46%) | 65 (41%) | 22 (61%) | ||
| CD30 expression | ||||||
| < 20% | 58 (83%) | 60 (83%) | 1.0 | 135 (82%) | 37 (97%) |
|
| ≥ 20% | 12 (17%) | 12 (17%) | 30 (18%) | 1 (3%) | ||
| p65 expression | ||||||
| < 10% | 22 (35%) | 29 (43%) | .47 | 61 (41%) | 7 (21%) |
|
| ≥ 10% | 40 (65%) | 39 (57%) | 89 (59%) | 27 (79%) | ||
| CXCR4 expression | ||||||
| < 20% | 43 (73%) | 47 (70%) | .84 | 109 (72%) | 19 (53%) |
|
| ≥ 20% | 16 (27%) | 20 (30%) | 42 (28%) | 17 (47%) | ||
Abbreviations: IGHV Immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene, IGK/LV Immunoglobulin kappa or lambda light chain variable region gene, SHM Low degree of somatic hypermutation, SHM High degree of somatic hypermutation, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, IPI International Prognostic Index, CR Complete response, PR Partial response, SD Stable disease, PD Progressive disease, GCB germinal center B-cell–like, ABC Activated B-cell–like, BAGS B-cell–associated gene signature, CB Centroblast subtype, CC Centrocyte subtype
Note: Not all patients had data available. Significant P values (Fisher’s exact test) are in bold. *For therapy response, P values were for comparisons between CR and non-CR cases
Fig. 2Predicted MHC-binding peptides for immunoglobulin diagnostic sequences and frequency of T-cell exposed motifs (TCEMs). a Regional distribution of relatively rare neoantigens (TCEM frequency classification [FC]> > 16) derived from light chain (left) and heavy chain (right) immunoglobulin genes in DLBCL patients. Protein sequences are aligned with cysteine at the start of complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) at the 0 of the X axis; peptides upstream of CDR3 were defined as framework region 3 (FW3). The stimulation metric was computed using the principle of the additivity of variance and is a product of the standardized MHC-II-binding affinity multiplied by the FC summed over all HLA-DR alleles. Each dot represents one peptide predicted as having high MHC-II-binding affinity (exceeding the − 1 standard deviation threshold for MHC derived from 24 HLA-DR alleles) and relatively rare TCEMs (FC > 16). The color intensities of the dots are scaled on the FC scale, which ranges from FC16 to the very rare FC24. b Histograms showing the distribution of the FC of the TCEMs in all MHC-II-binding peptides predicted for index trackable sequences. The FC scale ranges from the commonly presented FC1 to the very rare FC24. c Compared with cases without a high degree of heavy chain or light chain IGV SHM, cases with high degree of heavy chain or light chain IGV SHM had higher frequencies of relatively rare TCEMs (FC > 16)
Fig. 3Comparison of PD-1 expression between groups. a A representative image of a DLBCL sample is from an ABC-DLBCL case with a low degree of IGHV SHM (2.94%) and a long (21 amino acids) heavy chain complementarity determining region 3 (HCDR3). Fluorescence multiplex immunohistochemistry detected that PD-1 was expressed in T cells and proximal to PD-L1-expressing B cells. b Long HCDR3 length was associated with high PD-L1 expression in B cells in GCB-DLBCL and high PD-1 expression in CD4+/CD8+ T cells in ABC-DLBCL. c In the training set, a high degree of IGHV SHM (SHMhi) was associated with low PD-1 expression in CD8+/CD4+ T cells and B cells in ABC-DLBCL. In the validation set, IGHV SHMhi was associated with lower PD-L1 expression in CD8+ T cells. d PD-L2 protein expression in B cells was associated with a high degree of IGHV SHM. PD-L1 gene amplification was associated with a significantly higher mean degree of SHM in the IGHV diagnostic sequence. PD-L1/L2 gene amplification was associated with a higher mean percentage of subclones with IGHV ongoing SHM in the sequence repertoire
Fig. 4Prognostic analysis for IGHV ongoing SHM. a Schematic illustration of the putative pathologic origins of IGV SHM and ongoing SHM in DLBCL founder clones and subclones. Transformation can occur in different stages of B-cell development. When DLBCL abnormalities are sufficient to drive lymphomagenesis, DLBCL cells exit the germinal center reaction. Predominant DLBCL clones may exhibit intra-clonal IGV variations conferred by the ongoing SHM process. b IGHV ongoing SHM was associated with significantly poorer overall survival (OS) in the overall study cohort. c IGHV ongoing SHM was associated with poorer OS in the overall validation cohort and in cases without BCL2 rearrangement (BCL2-R−) in both the training and validation sets
Fig. 5Prognostic and correlative analyses for light chain IGK/LV SHM. a A high degree of IGK/LV SHM (SHMhigh) was associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS) in GCB-DLBCL. b The adverse prognostic effect of IGK/LV SHMhigh in GCB-DLBCL was significant in both the training and validation sets. c IGK/LV SHMhigh was associated with higher PD-L1 expression in CD56+ natural killer cells in overall GCB-DLBCL cases and with high PD-1 expression in CD4+ T cells in the training set. d There was a negative correlation between light chain IGK/LV ongoing SHM and IGK/LV SHM. High IGK/LV ongoing SHM was associated with low CTSS mRNA expression. e High numbers (≥17) of subclones with IGK/LV ongoing SHM were associated with significantly poorer OS in DLBCL
Fig. 6Schematic summary of the prognostic effects of IGV clonal SHM and ongoing SHM in DLBCL and putative underlying mechanisms suggested by in silico analysis and fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry and conventional chromogenic immunohistochemistry experiments. Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulin protein; AID, activation-induced cytidine deaminase; CSR, class-switch recombination; TCR, T-cell receptor; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; BCR, B-cell receptor; Mɸ, macrophage