Brian Downer1,2, Sadaf Milani2, Rebeca Wong2. 1. Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, Galveston. 2. Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many older adults become physically and cognitively impaired. However, it is unclear whether unimpaired older adults are more likely to become physically or cognitively impaired first and if this sequence impacts mortality risk. METHODS: Data came from the Mexican Health and Aging Study. The sample included 1,283 participants aged ≥60 years who were physically and cognitively unimpaired in 2001. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate probabilities of being unimpaired, cognitively impaired only, physically impaired only, or cognitively-physically impaired in 2003. Proportional hazard models were used to estimate mortality risk through 2015 according to physical and cognitive status in 2003. RESULTS: The probabilities for being unimpaired, physically impaired only, cognitively impaired only, and cognitively-physically impaired in 2003 were 0.45, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.13, respectively. Older age, female sex, and arthritis were associated with significantly greater probability of becoming physically impaired only than cognitively impaired only in 2003. Cognitive impairment only (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.85) in 2003 but not physical impairment only (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.94-1.58) was associated with greater mortality than being unimpaired in 2003. Cognitively-physically impaired participants had higher mortality risk than participants who were physically (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.18-2.12) or cognitively (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84) impaired only. DISCUSSION: The likelihood of becoming only physically or cognitively impaired over 2 years varies by demographic and health characteristics. The mortality risk for unimpaired older adults who become cognitively impaired only is similar to those who become physically impaired only. Research should determine if the sequence of cognitive and physical impairments is associated with other outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Many older adults become physically and cognitively impaired. However, it is unclear whether unimpaired older adults are more likely to become physically or cognitively impaired first and if this sequence impacts mortality risk. METHODS: Data came from the Mexican Health and Aging Study. The sample included 1,283 participants aged ≥60 years who were physically and cognitively unimpaired in 2001. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate probabilities of being unimpaired, cognitively impaired only, physically impaired only, or cognitively-physically impaired in 2003. Proportional hazard models were used to estimate mortality risk through 2015 according to physical and cognitive status in 2003. RESULTS: The probabilities for being unimpaired, physically impaired only, cognitively impaired only, and cognitively-physically impaired in 2003 were 0.45, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.13, respectively. Older age, female sex, and arthritis were associated with significantly greater probability of becoming physically impaired only than cognitively impaired only in 2003. Cognitive impairment only (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.85) in 2003 but not physical impairment only (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.94-1.58) was associated with greater mortality than being unimpaired in 2003. Cognitively-physically impaired participants had higher mortality risk than participants who were physically (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.18-2.12) or cognitively (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84) impaired only. DISCUSSION: The likelihood of becoming only physically or cognitively impaired over 2 years varies by demographic and health characteristics. The mortality risk for unimpaired older adults who become cognitively impaired only is similar to those who become physically impaired only. Research should determine if the sequence of cognitive and physical impairments is associated with other outcomes.
Authors: Karen Bandeen-Roche; Alden L Gross; Ravi Varadhan; Brian Buta; Michelle C Carlson; Megan Huisingh-Scheetz; Mara Mcadams-Demarco; Damani A Piggott; Todd T Brown; Rani K Hasan; Rita R Kalyani; Christopher L Seplaki; Jeremy D Walston; Qian-Li Xue Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: John R Best; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Robert M Boudreau; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephanie Studenski; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-04-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Matheus H L Arts; Rose M Collard; Hannie C Comijs; Marij Zuidersma; Sophia E de Rooij; Paul Naarding; Richard C Oude Voshaar Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Lana Sargent; Mike Nalls; Angela Starkweather; Sarah Hobgood; Holly Thompson; Elaine J Amella; Andrew Singleton Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Sean A P Clouston; Paul Brewster; Diana Kuh; Marcus Richards; Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Marcie S Rubin; Scott M Hofer Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 6.222